A Primary Care Intervention to Increase HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake in Patients with Syphilis.

Ryan Bonner, Jessica Stewart, Ashish Upadhyay, R Douglas Bruce, Jessica L Taylor
{"title":"A Primary Care Intervention to Increase HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake in Patients with Syphilis.","authors":"Ryan Bonner,&nbsp;Jessica Stewart,&nbsp;Ashish Upadhyay,&nbsp;R Douglas Bruce,&nbsp;Jessica L Taylor","doi":"10.1177/23259582211073393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying candidates for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a barrier to improving PrEP uptake in priority populations. Syphilis infection is an indication for PrEP in all individuals and can be easily assessed by primary care providers (PCP) and health systems. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary provider outreach intervention on PrEP uptake in patients with a positive syphilis test result in a safety-net hospital-based primary care practice. The PCPs of PrEP-eligible patients with a positive syphilis result were notified via the electronic medical record (EMR) about potential PrEP eligibility and institutional HIV PrEP resources. Rates of PrEP offers and prescriptions were compared in the pre (8/1/2018-12/31/2018, <i>n</i> = 60) and post (1/1/2019-5/31/2019, <i>n</i> = 86) intervention periods. Secondary analyzes evaluated receipt of appropriate syphilis treatment and contemporaneous screening for HIV, gonorrhea, and chlamydia. No significant differences in the overall proportion of patients offered (15% vs 19%) and prescribed (7% vs 5%) PrEP were observed between the pre- and post-periods. Overall, 7% of positive tests represented infectious syphilis. The rate of appropriate syphilis treatment was equivalent (57% vs 56%) and contemporaneous screening for other sexually transmitted infections was suboptimal across the entire study period. Although any positive syphilis test may be an easily abstracted metric from the EMR, this approach was inclusive of many patients without current HIV risk and did not increase PrEP uptake significantly. Future research into population health approaches to increase HIV prevention should focus on patients with infectious syphilis and other current risk factors for incident HIV infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/e9/10.1177_23259582211073393.PMC8753072.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259582211073393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Identifying candidates for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a barrier to improving PrEP uptake in priority populations. Syphilis infection is an indication for PrEP in all individuals and can be easily assessed by primary care providers (PCP) and health systems. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of a multidisciplinary provider outreach intervention on PrEP uptake in patients with a positive syphilis test result in a safety-net hospital-based primary care practice. The PCPs of PrEP-eligible patients with a positive syphilis result were notified via the electronic medical record (EMR) about potential PrEP eligibility and institutional HIV PrEP resources. Rates of PrEP offers and prescriptions were compared in the pre (8/1/2018-12/31/2018, n = 60) and post (1/1/2019-5/31/2019, n = 86) intervention periods. Secondary analyzes evaluated receipt of appropriate syphilis treatment and contemporaneous screening for HIV, gonorrhea, and chlamydia. No significant differences in the overall proportion of patients offered (15% vs 19%) and prescribed (7% vs 5%) PrEP were observed between the pre- and post-periods. Overall, 7% of positive tests represented infectious syphilis. The rate of appropriate syphilis treatment was equivalent (57% vs 56%) and contemporaneous screening for other sexually transmitted infections was suboptimal across the entire study period. Although any positive syphilis test may be an easily abstracted metric from the EMR, this approach was inclusive of many patients without current HIV risk and did not increase PrEP uptake significantly. Future research into population health approaches to increase HIV prevention should focus on patients with infectious syphilis and other current risk factors for incident HIV infection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加梅毒患者HIV暴露前预防(PrEP)摄取的初级保健干预。
确定艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)的候选对象是提高重点人群对PrEP的吸收的一个障碍。梅毒感染是所有人接受PrEP的指征,可由初级保健提供者和卫生系统轻松评估。本回顾性研究评估了多学科提供者外展干预对医院安全网初级保健实践中梅毒检测结果阳性患者服用PrEP的影响。通过电子病历(electronic medical record, EMR)向符合PrEP条件的梅毒阳性患者的pcp通报潜在的PrEP资格和机构HIV PrEP资源。比较干预前(2018年1月8日- 2018年12月31日,n = 60)和干预后(2019年1月1日- 2019年5月31日,n = 86)的PrEP提供率和处方率。二次分析评估了接受适当的梅毒治疗和同时进行HIV、淋病和衣原体筛查的情况。经前后提供PrEP (15% vs 19%)和处方PrEP (7% vs 5%)的患者总体比例无显著差异。总体而言,7%的阳性检测为传染性梅毒。适当的梅毒治疗率是相等的(57%对56%),同时筛查其他性传播感染在整个研究期间是次优的。尽管梅毒检测阳性可能是EMR中一个容易抽象的指标,但该方法包括了许多目前没有艾滋病毒风险的患者,并且没有显著增加PrEP的使用。未来研究人群健康途径以加强艾滋病毒预防应侧重于传染性梅毒患者和其他当前的艾滋病毒感染事件的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Providers as Health Discussants on Black Women's Interest in PrEP for HIV Prevention. The Provider's Role in Retaining Black Women With HIV in Care: A Scoping Review. Rapid Start of Antiretroviral Therapy in a Large Urban Clinic in the US South: Impact on HIV Care Continuum Outcomes and Medication Adherence. Dissemination of the Women-Centred HIV Care Model: A Multimodal Process and Evaluation. Policy and Programming Towards Addressing Treatment Gaps in Adolescents Living with HIV: A Content Analysis of Policy and Programme Documents in Namibia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1