75 years of Population Studies: A diamond anniversary special issue.

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Population Studies-A Journal of Demography Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1080/00324728.2021.2006440
Wendy Sigle, Alice Reid, Rebecca Sear
{"title":"75 years of <i>Population Studies</i>: A diamond anniversary special issue.","authors":"Wendy Sigle,&nbsp;Alice Reid,&nbsp;Rebecca Sear","doi":"10.1080/00324728.2021.2006440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The celebration of anniversaries is a long-standing, widespread, and popular custom, connecting us to the cycle of life and prompting reflections on who we have become. Celebrations are often linked to demographic events or transitions, such as births and weddings or, in the case of royalty, events such as transition to the throne. As 2021 draws to a close, Population Studies: A Journal of Demography completes its 75th year of publication. To mark its golden anniversary in 1996, the editors curated a special issue which brought together a range of reflections about the state of the discipline and the contribution the journal had made in its first 50 years. That issue was as glittery and as weighty as something golden should be (with a specific gravity of 19.3, pure gold is one of the heaviest minerals in the world). Many of the papers in that remarkable collection could be described as classics: they remain highly cited and are frequently downloaded by both researchers and students. The issue came out when we, the guest editors of this special issue, were students ourselves and were just beginning the process of academic and discipline-specific enculturation. By describing the discipline itself— its priorities, sources of data, and ways of knowing —the 1996 special issue provided a polished insider view of the scholarly community that was, at that stage in our lives, not entirely familiar to us. Given how much the world and the discipline— and we ourselves—have changed in the past quarter of a century, we thought the 75th anniversary would be a good time to once again take stock and reflect. With some accounts locating its origins in the German bloc of the Holy Roman Empire, the association of gold with the 50th anniversary and silver with the 25th anniversary is a centuries-old European custom, one which did not appear to make its way to Anglo-Saxon Europe until the nineteenth century. Although the diamond came to be associated with the 60th anniversary when Queen Victoria celebrated her Diamond Jubilee, prior to that, the ‘traditional’ diamond anniversary was the 75th. What unique aspects of the diamond did we hope to bring to this celebration and this issue? One of the key distinctions between gold and diamonds is that gold is homogeneous and diamonds are not. It is perhaps right then that this issue has sought to include a more heterogeneous set of authors and perspectives than was included 25 years ago. At the same time, diamonds usually come with some kind of imperfection. They are often recut to improve them. Our diamond celebration draws attention to what has been and is so very beautiful about the discipline but also considers its imperfections and ways it might be recut to enhance its value. Like diamonds, our discipline is strong and resilient. We are confident it can withstand some scrutiny and critique alongside some well-deserved appreciation. What better way to take stock—and to celebrate the journal’s contribution to knowledge—than to construct a detailed profile of the body of research published over the life of this journal? Melinda Mills and Charles Rahal conduct a fascinating assessment of all 1,901 papers published since its first issue in 1947. While most readers familiar with the journal will have some idea of prominent topics that were covered in it and how the research focus has (or has not) changed over the years, their detailed findings do far more than simply confirm expectations. While we were not surprised to find that fertility has been the topic most often written about in the journal, or that there was more research on mortality than migration, we were a little surprised to learn that for a journal that was slower than other demography journals to present research on issues such as women’s employment and childcare (Caldwell 1996; Presser 1997; Desai 2000), Population Studies has published even fewer papers on migration than on family and marriage. Although migration is one of the three components of population change and a demographic Population Studies, 2021 Vol. 75, No. S1, S1–S5, https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.2006440","PeriodicalId":47814,"journal":{"name":"Population Studies-A Journal of Demography","volume":"75 sup1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Studies-A Journal of Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.2006440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The celebration of anniversaries is a long-standing, widespread, and popular custom, connecting us to the cycle of life and prompting reflections on who we have become. Celebrations are often linked to demographic events or transitions, such as births and weddings or, in the case of royalty, events such as transition to the throne. As 2021 draws to a close, Population Studies: A Journal of Demography completes its 75th year of publication. To mark its golden anniversary in 1996, the editors curated a special issue which brought together a range of reflections about the state of the discipline and the contribution the journal had made in its first 50 years. That issue was as glittery and as weighty as something golden should be (with a specific gravity of 19.3, pure gold is one of the heaviest minerals in the world). Many of the papers in that remarkable collection could be described as classics: they remain highly cited and are frequently downloaded by both researchers and students. The issue came out when we, the guest editors of this special issue, were students ourselves and were just beginning the process of academic and discipline-specific enculturation. By describing the discipline itself— its priorities, sources of data, and ways of knowing —the 1996 special issue provided a polished insider view of the scholarly community that was, at that stage in our lives, not entirely familiar to us. Given how much the world and the discipline— and we ourselves—have changed in the past quarter of a century, we thought the 75th anniversary would be a good time to once again take stock and reflect. With some accounts locating its origins in the German bloc of the Holy Roman Empire, the association of gold with the 50th anniversary and silver with the 25th anniversary is a centuries-old European custom, one which did not appear to make its way to Anglo-Saxon Europe until the nineteenth century. Although the diamond came to be associated with the 60th anniversary when Queen Victoria celebrated her Diamond Jubilee, prior to that, the ‘traditional’ diamond anniversary was the 75th. What unique aspects of the diamond did we hope to bring to this celebration and this issue? One of the key distinctions between gold and diamonds is that gold is homogeneous and diamonds are not. It is perhaps right then that this issue has sought to include a more heterogeneous set of authors and perspectives than was included 25 years ago. At the same time, diamonds usually come with some kind of imperfection. They are often recut to improve them. Our diamond celebration draws attention to what has been and is so very beautiful about the discipline but also considers its imperfections and ways it might be recut to enhance its value. Like diamonds, our discipline is strong and resilient. We are confident it can withstand some scrutiny and critique alongside some well-deserved appreciation. What better way to take stock—and to celebrate the journal’s contribution to knowledge—than to construct a detailed profile of the body of research published over the life of this journal? Melinda Mills and Charles Rahal conduct a fascinating assessment of all 1,901 papers published since its first issue in 1947. While most readers familiar with the journal will have some idea of prominent topics that were covered in it and how the research focus has (or has not) changed over the years, their detailed findings do far more than simply confirm expectations. While we were not surprised to find that fertility has been the topic most often written about in the journal, or that there was more research on mortality than migration, we were a little surprised to learn that for a journal that was slower than other demography journals to present research on issues such as women’s employment and childcare (Caldwell 1996; Presser 1997; Desai 2000), Population Studies has published even fewer papers on migration than on family and marriage. Although migration is one of the three components of population change and a demographic Population Studies, 2021 Vol. 75, No. S1, S1–S5, https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.2006440
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人口研究75年:钻石周年特刊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: For over half a century, Population Studies has reported significant advances in methods of demographic analysis, conceptual and mathematical theories of demographic dynamics and behaviour, and the use of these theories and methods to extend scientific knowledge and to inform policy and practice. The Journal"s coverage of this field is comprehensive: applications in developed and developing countries; historical and contemporary studies; quantitative and qualitative studies; analytical essays and reviews. The subjects of papers range from classical concerns, such as the determinants and consequences of population change, to such topics as family demography and evolutionary and genetic influences on demographic behaviour.
期刊最新文献
Party penalty or party premium? 'Party Swedes' in Norway and their income before, during, and after migration. Estimating adult mortality based on maternal orphanhood in populations with HIV/AIDS. Intergenerational transmission of fertility in Great Britain: A parity-specific investigation using the 1970 British Cohort Study. Estimating age-specific mortality using calibrated splines. Infant and child mortality in the Netherlands 1935-47 and changes related to the Dutch famine of 1944-45: A population-based analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1