Antibacterial efficacy of different combinations of clove, eucalyptus, ginger, and selected antibiotics against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Ayu Pub Date : 2020-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-23 DOI:10.4103/ayu.AYU_101_19
Pankaj Kumar Sagar, Poonam Sharma, Rambir Singh
{"title":"Antibacterial efficacy of different combinations of clove, eucalyptus, ginger, and selected antibiotics against clinical isolates of <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>.","authors":"Pankaj Kumar Sagar,&nbsp;Poonam Sharma,&nbsp;Rambir Singh","doi":"10.4103/ayu.AYU_101_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> are commonly treated with conventional antibiotic which may lead to some serious side effects in the patients. Conventionally, medicinal plants, including clove, eucalyptus, and ginger, are used for the safe and effective treatment of several diseases.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The aim and objective of this study is to evaluate the combined antibacterial efficacy of medicinal plants (clove, eucalyptus, and ginger) and selected antibiotic and also combined efficacy of different plants extracts against clinical isolates of <i>P. aeruginosa</i>.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of seven clinical isolates and one reference strain (PA01) of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were included in this study. The antibacterial activity of crude methanol extracts of medicinal plants and selected antibiotics was screened using well-diffusion assay and their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the microdilution method. Combined efficacy of ceftazidime and plant extracts was tested using standard checkerboard method and different plant extracts were evaluated using broth macrodilution method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All of the seven clinical isolates of <i>P. aeruginosa</i> showed multidrug resistance pattern and were found highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin followed by ceftazidime and gentamicin. Clove exhibited better antibacterial activity as compared to eucalyptus and ginger. Synergistic interaction was found between ceftazidime and plants extracts against reference PA01 and clinical isolate 2. Highest two-fold reduction in MIC was found in the combination of clove-ginger against reference PA01 and clinical isolate 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The selected medicinal plants are highly efficient for enhancing the antibacterial activity of antibiotic.</p>","PeriodicalId":8720,"journal":{"name":"Ayu","volume":"41 2","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/4e/AYU-41-123.PMC8614201.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.AYU_101_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Nosocomial infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are commonly treated with conventional antibiotic which may lead to some serious side effects in the patients. Conventionally, medicinal plants, including clove, eucalyptus, and ginger, are used for the safe and effective treatment of several diseases.

Aims and objectives: The aim and objective of this study is to evaluate the combined antibacterial efficacy of medicinal plants (clove, eucalyptus, and ginger) and selected antibiotic and also combined efficacy of different plants extracts against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa.

Materials and methods: A total of seven clinical isolates and one reference strain (PA01) of P. aeruginosa were included in this study. The antibacterial activity of crude methanol extracts of medicinal plants and selected antibiotics was screened using well-diffusion assay and their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by the microdilution method. Combined efficacy of ceftazidime and plant extracts was tested using standard checkerboard method and different plant extracts were evaluated using broth macrodilution method.

Results: All of the seven clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa showed multidrug resistance pattern and were found highly sensitive to ciprofloxacin followed by ceftazidime and gentamicin. Clove exhibited better antibacterial activity as compared to eucalyptus and ginger. Synergistic interaction was found between ceftazidime and plants extracts against reference PA01 and clinical isolate 2. Highest two-fold reduction in MIC was found in the combination of clove-ginger against reference PA01 and clinical isolate 3.

Conclusion: The selected medicinal plants are highly efficient for enhancing the antibacterial activity of antibiotic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丁香、桉树、生姜和选定抗生素不同组合对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的抑菌效果。
背景:耐多药铜绿假单胞菌引起的医院感染通常采用常规抗生素治疗,但可能导致一些严重的副作用。传统上,包括丁香、桉树和姜在内的药用植物被用于安全有效地治疗几种疾病。目的和目的:本研究的目的和目的是评价药用植物(丁香、桉树和生姜)与选定抗生素的联合抑菌效果,以及不同植物提取物对临床分离的铜绿假单胞菌的联合抑菌效果。材料与方法:选取铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa) 7株临床分离株和1株参考菌株PA01。采用孔扩散法筛选药用植物粗甲醇提取物和所选抗生素的抑菌活性,采用微稀释法测定其最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。采用标准棋盘法检测头孢他啶与植物提取物的联合药效,采用肉汤大量稀释法评价不同植物提取物的联合药效。结果:7株铜绿假单胞菌均呈多药耐药模式,对环丙沙星高度敏感,其次为头孢他啶和庆大霉素。丁香比桉树和生姜具有更好的抗菌活性。头孢他啶与植物提取物对对照PA01和临床分离物2存在协同作用。丁香姜联合抗参考PA01和临床分离物3的MIC降低幅度最大,为2倍。结论:所选药用植物对抗生素的抑菌活性有较好的增强作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ayu
Ayu
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review in health care: Need and significance. Ayurveda fundamentals and science - A perspective. Management of Mutrashmari (urolithiasis) with Palasha Kshara and Ashmarihara Kwatha: An open-labelled placebo-controlled clinical trial. A lexical review on Vishaghna Dravyas of Kaideva Nighantu. Antioxidant content and activity of stem and leaf extracts of Gouania longipetala Hemsl. (Rhamnaceae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1