Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of Pesticide Science Pub Date : 2021-11-20 DOI:10.1584/jpestics.D21-034
Takashi Nagai
{"title":"Ecological effect assessment by species sensitivity distribution for 38 pesticides with various modes of action.","authors":"Takashi Nagai","doi":"10.1584/jpestics.D21-034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of 38 pesticides with various modes of action were analyzed as a higher-tier ecological effect assessment based on collected acute toxicity data. Then the 5% hazardous concentrations (HC<sub>5</sub>) based on each SSD were calculated as the predicted no-effect concentrations for aquatic ecosystems. The differences between HC<sub>5</sub> and registration criteria were small (within ten-fold) for 35 of the 38 pesticides. However, there were more than ten-fold differences for a fungicide and two herbicides. These results suggest that the current effect assessment scheme could underestimate the effect of such pesticides. This could be caused by differences in sensitivity of specific properties of the mode of action.</p>","PeriodicalId":16712,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pesticide Science","volume":"46 4","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/07/b3/jps-46-4-D21-034.PMC8640677.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pesticide Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D21-034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) of 38 pesticides with various modes of action were analyzed as a higher-tier ecological effect assessment based on collected acute toxicity data. Then the 5% hazardous concentrations (HC5) based on each SSD were calculated as the predicted no-effect concentrations for aquatic ecosystems. The differences between HC5 and registration criteria were small (within ten-fold) for 35 of the 38 pesticides. However, there were more than ten-fold differences for a fungicide and two herbicides. These results suggest that the current effect assessment scheme could underestimate the effect of such pesticides. This could be caused by differences in sensitivity of specific properties of the mode of action.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
38种不同作用方式农药的物种敏感性分布生态效应评价。
根据收集到的急性毒性数据,对 38 种具有不同作用模式的农药的物种敏感性分布(SSD)进行了分析,作为更高层次的生态效应评估。然后,根据每个 SSD 计算出 5%的有害浓度(HC5),作为水生生态系统的预测无效应浓度。在 38 种农药中,有 35 种农药的 HC5 与登记标准之间的差异很小(在 10 倍以内)。然而,一种杀真菌剂和两种除草剂的 HC5 与登记标准之间的差异超过十倍。这些结果表明,目前的效果评估方案可能低估了这些农药的效果。这可能是由于作用模式的特定属性的敏感性不同造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pesticide Science
Journal of Pesticide Science 农林科学-昆虫学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pesticide Science publishes the results of original research regarding the chemistry and biochemistry of pesticides including bio-based materials. It also covers their metabolism, toxicology, environmental fate and formulation.
期刊最新文献
Effect of pyriofenone on the infection processes and cytological features of Blumeria graminis on wheat leaves Synthesis and biological evaluation of burnettiene A derivatives enabling discovery of novel fungicide candidates. Enhanced disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea by strigolactone-mediated immune priming in Arabidopsis thaliana A reliable quantification of organophosphorus pesticides in brown rice samples for proficiency testing using Japanese official analytical method, QuEChERS, and modified QuEChERS combined with isotope dilution mass spectrometry Bacterial Pesticides: Mechanism of Action, Possibility of Food Contamination, and Residue Analysis Using MS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1