Nationwide external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests in Japan

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES International Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.022
Satomi Asai , Akira Seki , Yasumasa Akai , Hiromitsu Tazawa , Hidehumi Kakizoe , Mend-Amar Ravzanaaadii , Hayato Miyachi
{"title":"Nationwide external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests in Japan","authors":"Satomi Asai ,&nbsp;Akira Seki ,&nbsp;Yasumasa Akai ,&nbsp;Hiromitsu Tazawa ,&nbsp;Hidehumi Kakizoe ,&nbsp;Mend-Amar Ravzanaaadii ,&nbsp;Hayato Miyachi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We conducted a nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) study of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid amplification testing in Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 563 public health and private sector laboratories participated. The EQA samples comprised 6 RNA and full-process controls.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall agreements were 99.3% and 97.9% for the RNA and full-process controls, respectively. A total of 530/563 (94.1%) laboratories reported correct results; public health laboratories had the highest accuracy. Thirty-three laboratories reported at least one incorrect result (26 laboratories of medical facilities, 5 commercial laboratories, 1 public health laboratory, and 1 other). Sixteen laboratories of medical facilities that used a fully automated assay system failed to detect the presence of the full-process control, due to inherent insufficiency in the limit of detection (LOD). Other causes of incorrect results included failure to ensure the LOD (n = 13), error in result judging or reporting (n = 3), and error in sample handling (n = 1).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Performance was mostly dependent on the laboratory category and assay evaluation, particularly the LOD. Guidance should be developed based on these results, particularly in the phase of new entry into laboratory services for SARS-CoV-2.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"115 ","pages":"Pages 86-92"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8595969/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971221008699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objectives

We conducted a nationwide external quality assessment (EQA) study of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid amplification testing in Japan.

Methods

A total of 563 public health and private sector laboratories participated. The EQA samples comprised 6 RNA and full-process controls.

Results

The overall agreements were 99.3% and 97.9% for the RNA and full-process controls, respectively. A total of 530/563 (94.1%) laboratories reported correct results; public health laboratories had the highest accuracy. Thirty-three laboratories reported at least one incorrect result (26 laboratories of medical facilities, 5 commercial laboratories, 1 public health laboratory, and 1 other). Sixteen laboratories of medical facilities that used a fully automated assay system failed to detect the presence of the full-process control, due to inherent insufficiency in the limit of detection (LOD). Other causes of incorrect results included failure to ensure the LOD (n = 13), error in result judging or reporting (n = 3), and error in sample handling (n = 1).

Conclusions

Performance was mostly dependent on the laboratory category and assay evaluation, particularly the LOD. Guidance should be developed based on these results, particularly in the phase of new entry into laboratory services for SARS-CoV-2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本全国SARS-CoV-2核酸扩增检测的外部质量评价
目的对日本全国范围内SARS-CoV-2核酸扩增检测进行外部质量评价(EQA)研究。方法共有563个公共卫生和私营部门实验室参与。EQA样品包括6个RNA和全流程对照。结果RNA和全程对照的总体符合率分别为99.3%和97.9%。530/563个(94.1%)实验室报告结果正确;公共卫生实验室的准确率最高。33个实验室报告了至少一个错误结果(26个医疗机构实验室、5个商业实验室、1个公共卫生实验室和1个其他实验室)。由于检测限(LOD)的内在不足,使用全自动分析系统的16个医疗机构实验室未能检测到全过程控制的存在。其他不正确结果的原因包括未能确保LOD (n = 13),结果判断或报告错误(n = 3)和样品处理错误(n = 1)。结论性能主要取决于实验室类别和分析评估,特别是LOD。应根据这些结果制定指南,特别是在SARS-CoV-2新进入实验室服务阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
期刊最新文献
Genotypic-phenotypic discordance for cefiderocol against Enterobacter hormaechei. Severe Necrotic and Fatal Monkeypox in HIV-infected Patients. Impact of diabetes on TB infection diagnosis. Probable Lyme Carditis in Pacemaker Candidates With Atrioventricular Block: Preliminary Results From Northern Serbia. SARS-CoV-2 Variant Specific Protective Immunity and Long-term Immune Recovery in People Living With HIV: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1