Effects of Posttrial Antihypertensive Drugs on Morbidity and Mortality: Findings from 15-Year Passive Follow-Up after ALLHAT Ended.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2021-12-09 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/2261144
Xianglin L Du, Lara M Simpson, Brian C Tandy, Judy Bettencourt, Barry R Davis
{"title":"Effects of Posttrial Antihypertensive Drugs on Morbidity and Mortality: Findings from 15-Year Passive Follow-Up after ALLHAT Ended.","authors":"Xianglin L Du, Lara M Simpson, Brian C Tandy, Judy Bettencourt, Barry R Davis","doi":"10.1155/2021/2261144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) ended in 2002, but it is important to study its long-term outcomes during the posttrial period by incorporating posttrial antihypertensive medication uses in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Purposes: </strong>The primary aim is to explore the patterns of antihypertensive medication use during the posttrial period from Medicare Part-D data over the 11-year period from 2007 to 2017. The secondary aim is to examine the potential effects of these posttrial antihypertensive medications on the observed mortality and morbidity benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a posttrial passive follow-up study of ALLHAT participants in 567 US centers in 1994-1998 with the last date of active in-trial follow-up on March 31, 2002, by linking with their Medicare and National Death Index data through 2017 among 8,007 subjects receiving antihypertensive drugs (3,637 for chlorthalidone, 2,189 for amlodipine, and 2,181 for lisinopril). Outcomes included posttrial antihypertensive drug use, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8007 subjects, 3,637 participants were initially randomized to diuretic (chlorthalidone). The majority (67.9%) of them still received diuretics in 2007, and 52.7%, 47.2%, and 44.0% received <i>β</i>-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), respectively. Compared to participants who received diuretic-based antihypertensives, those who received CCB had a nonsignificantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.17, 0.99-1.37), whereas those who received ACE/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers) had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.26, 1.09-1.45). For the combined fatal or nonfatal hospitalized events, the risk of CVD was significantly higher in patients receiving CCB (1.30, 1.04-1.61) and ACE/ARB (1.49, 1.22-1.81) as compared to patients receiving diuretics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After the conclusion of the ALLHAT, almost all patients switched to combination antihypertensive therapies, independently by the original drug class, and the combination therapies (mostly based on diuretics) reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14132,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hypertension","volume":"2021 ","pages":"2261144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8677412/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2261144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) ended in 2002, but it is important to study its long-term outcomes during the posttrial period by incorporating posttrial antihypertensive medication uses in the analysis.

Purposes: The primary aim is to explore the patterns of antihypertensive medication use during the posttrial period from Medicare Part-D data over the 11-year period from 2007 to 2017. The secondary aim is to examine the potential effects of these posttrial antihypertensive medications on the observed mortality and morbidity benefits.

Methods: This is a posttrial passive follow-up study of ALLHAT participants in 567 US centers in 1994-1998 with the last date of active in-trial follow-up on March 31, 2002, by linking with their Medicare and National Death Index data through 2017 among 8,007 subjects receiving antihypertensive drugs (3,637 for chlorthalidone, 2,189 for amlodipine, and 2,181 for lisinopril). Outcomes included posttrial antihypertensive drug use, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.

Results: Of 8007 subjects, 3,637 participants were initially randomized to diuretic (chlorthalidone). The majority (67.9%) of them still received diuretics in 2007, and 52.7%, 47.2%, and 44.0% received β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), respectively. Compared to participants who received diuretic-based antihypertensives, those who received CCB had a nonsignificantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.17, 0.99-1.37), whereas those who received ACE/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers) had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.26, 1.09-1.45). For the combined fatal or nonfatal hospitalized events, the risk of CVD was significantly higher in patients receiving CCB (1.30, 1.04-1.61) and ACE/ARB (1.49, 1.22-1.81) as compared to patients receiving diuretics.

Conclusion: After the conclusion of the ALLHAT, almost all patients switched to combination antihypertensive therapies, independently by the original drug class, and the combination therapies (mostly based on diuretics) reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
试验后抗高血压药物对发病率和死亡率的影响:ALLHAT结束后15年被动随访的结果。
背景:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)于2002年结束,但通过将试验后降压药物的使用纳入分析,研究其试验后的长期结果是很重要的。目的:主要目的是通过2007年至2017年11年的医疗保险d部分数据,探讨试验后抗高血压药物的使用模式。第二个目的是检查这些试验后降压药物对观察到的死亡率和发病率的潜在影响。方法:这是一项试验后被动随访研究,在1994-1998年期间,567个美国中心的ALLHAT参与者,最后一次积极的试验中随访日期为2002年3月31日,通过与他们的医疗保险和国家死亡指数数据相关联,截至2017年,8,007名接受降压药的受试者(氯噻酮3,637例,氨氯地平2,189例,赖诺普利2,181例)。结果包括试验后抗高血压药物使用、全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率。结果:在8007名受试者中,3637名参与者最初被随机分配到利尿剂(氯噻酮)组。大多数患者(67.9%)在2007年仍使用利尿剂,52.7%、47.2%和44.0%分别使用β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂(CCBs)。与接受利尿剂为基础的抗高血压药物的参与者相比,接受CCB的参与者的全因死亡率风险不显著增高(1.17,0.99-1.37),而接受ACE/ARB(血管紧张素受体阻滞剂)的参与者的全因死亡率风险显著增高(1.26,1.09-1.45)。对于合并致死性或非致死性住院事件,与接受利尿剂的患者相比,接受CCB(1.30, 1.04-1.61)和ACE/ARB(1.49, 1.22-1.81)的患者发生CVD的风险显著更高。结论:ALLHAT结束后,几乎所有患者都独立于原药物类别改用联合降压治疗,联合治疗(主要以利尿剂为主)降低了主要心血管结局的发生率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hypertension
International Journal of Hypertension Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: International Journal of Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for clinicians and basic scientists interested in blood pressure regulation and pathophysiology, as well as treatment and prevention of hypertension. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies on the etiology and risk factors of hypertension, with a special focus on vascular biology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, and hypertensive nephropathy.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide on Sympathoinhibition in Obese Pithed Rats and Participation of K+ Channel. Identifying Who Benefits the Most from a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention for Hypertension. Effects of Renal Denervation on Ouabain-Induced Hypertension in Rats. Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors Associated with Diagonal Earlobe Crease (Frank Sign) in Mexican Adults: Aging, Obesity, Arterial Hypertension, and Being Male Are the Most Important. Effect of Yogurt Intake Frequency on Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1