The contribution of professions to the governance of integrated care: Towards a conceptual framework based on case studies from Denmark.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Services Research & Policy Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-23 DOI:10.1177/13558196211055652
Viola Burau, Ellen Kuhlmann, Loni Ledderer
{"title":"The contribution of professions to the governance of integrated care: Towards a conceptual framework based on case studies from Denmark.","authors":"Viola Burau,&nbsp;Ellen Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Loni Ledderer","doi":"10.1177/13558196211055652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Good governance of integrated care is key to better health care, but we know little about how professions can help make this happen. Our aim is to introduce a conceptual framework to analyse how professions contribute to the governance of integrated care, and to apply the framework to a secondary analysis of selected case studies from Denmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a framework, which identified the <i>what</i>, <i>how</i> and <i>why</i> of the contribution professions make to the governance of integrated care. We included five qualitative Danish studies, using coordination as an indicator of integrated care. We adopted a thematic approach in our analysis, combining deductive and inductive elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health professions engage in highly diverse activities, which fall into closely connected clusters of more formal or more informal coordination. Professions apply many different adaptive mechanisms at different levels to fit coordination into local contexts. Professions are driven by interlocking rationales, where a common focus on patients connects organizational and professional concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analytical framework emerges as a useful tool for analysis. The contribution of professions to the governance of integrated care needs greater attention in health policy implementation as it can promote more effective governance of integrated care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"27 2","pages":"106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196211055652","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Good governance of integrated care is key to better health care, but we know little about how professions can help make this happen. Our aim is to introduce a conceptual framework to analyse how professions contribute to the governance of integrated care, and to apply the framework to a secondary analysis of selected case studies from Denmark.

Methods: We developed a framework, which identified the what, how and why of the contribution professions make to the governance of integrated care. We included five qualitative Danish studies, using coordination as an indicator of integrated care. We adopted a thematic approach in our analysis, combining deductive and inductive elements.

Results: Health professions engage in highly diverse activities, which fall into closely connected clusters of more formal or more informal coordination. Professions apply many different adaptive mechanisms at different levels to fit coordination into local contexts. Professions are driven by interlocking rationales, where a common focus on patients connects organizational and professional concerns.

Conclusions: Our analytical framework emerges as a useful tool for analysis. The contribution of professions to the governance of integrated care needs greater attention in health policy implementation as it can promote more effective governance of integrated care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专业对综合护理治理的贡献:基于丹麦案例研究的概念框架。
目的:综合护理的良好治理是改善卫生保健的关键,但我们对专业如何帮助实现这一目标知之甚少。我们的目标是引入一个概念框架来分析专业如何对综合护理的治理做出贡献,并将该框架应用于对来自丹麦的选定案例研究的二次分析。方法:我们开发了一个框架,该框架确定了专业人员对综合护理治理的贡献是什么、如何以及为什么。我们纳入了五项丹麦定性研究,使用协调作为综合护理的指标。我们在分析中采用了主题法,将演绎与归纳相结合。结果:卫生专业人员从事高度多样化的活动,这些活动属于更正式或更非正式协调的紧密联系的集群。职业在不同层次应用许多不同的适应机制,使协调适应当地环境。职业是由环环相扣的基本原理驱动的,对患者的共同关注将组织和专业问题联系起来。结论:我们的分析框架是一个有用的分析工具。专业人员对综合护理治理的贡献需要在卫生政策执行中得到更多关注,因为它可以促进更有效的综合护理治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
期刊最新文献
Health care utilization and costs among coordinated care patients in Southeastern Ontario: A difference-in-differences study of a double propensity score-matched cohort. The role of collaborative governance in translating national cancer programs into network-based practices: A longitudinal case study in Canada. How can specialist investigation agencies inform system-wide learning for patient safety? A qualitative study of perspectives on the early years of the English healthcare safety investigation branch. What can the era of big data and big data analytics mean for health services research? Collaborative and integrated working between general practice and community pharmacies: A realist review of what works, for whom, and in which contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1