Alignment of health plan coverage policies for somatic multigene panel testing with clinical guidelines in select solid tumors.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Personalized medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-04 DOI:10.2217/pme-2021-0174
William B Wong, Daniele Anina, Chia-Wei Lin, Devon V Adams
{"title":"Alignment of health plan coverage policies for somatic multigene panel testing with clinical guidelines in select solid tumors.","authors":"William B Wong,&nbsp;Daniele Anina,&nbsp;Chia-Wei Lin,&nbsp;Devon V Adams","doi":"10.2217/pme-2021-0174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Commercial plan coverage policies for multigene panel tests may vary and could result in geographic variation in coverage due to the fragmented nature of the commercial insurance market. This study aimed to characterize the alignment of multigene panel tests coverage policies to that of clinical guidelines, overall and by state. <b>Materials & methods:</b> We reviewed NCCN Guidelines<sup>®</sup> for four tumors. Public coverage policies were identified via web search. Payer policies included those with the largest or second largest number of commercial lives in each state. Policies were classified as 'more restrictive' or 'consistent' with the guidelines. <b>Results:</b> Of 38 plans/policies reviewed, 71% were classified as 'more restrictive' than the guidelines, with variation in the number of commercial lives by state. Among these, 52% restricted on panel size and 63% restricted in all or select tumors. <b>Conclusion:</b> Most coverage policies were more restrictive. Clinical guideline clarity and state policies may improve alignment to guidelines and geographic variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19753,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2021-0174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aim: Commercial plan coverage policies for multigene panel tests may vary and could result in geographic variation in coverage due to the fragmented nature of the commercial insurance market. This study aimed to characterize the alignment of multigene panel tests coverage policies to that of clinical guidelines, overall and by state. Materials & methods: We reviewed NCCN Guidelines® for four tumors. Public coverage policies were identified via web search. Payer policies included those with the largest or second largest number of commercial lives in each state. Policies were classified as 'more restrictive' or 'consistent' with the guidelines. Results: Of 38 plans/policies reviewed, 71% were classified as 'more restrictive' than the guidelines, with variation in the number of commercial lives by state. Among these, 52% restricted on panel size and 63% restricted in all or select tumors. Conclusion: Most coverage policies were more restrictive. Clinical guideline clarity and state policies may improve alignment to guidelines and geographic variations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选定实体瘤的躯体多基因面板检测与临床指南的健康计划覆盖政策的一致性
目的:由于商业保险市场的碎片化性质,多基因面板测试的商业计划承保政策可能会有所不同,并可能导致承保范围的地域差异。本研究旨在描述多基因面板测试覆盖政策与临床指南的一致性,总体上和按州划分。材料与方法:我们回顾了四种肿瘤的NCCN指南®。通过网络搜索确定公共保险政策。付款人政策包括每个州商业生命数量最多或第二多的政策。政策被分为“限制性更强”和“与指导方针一致”两类。结果:在审查的38项计划/政策中,71%被归类为“限制性更强”,各州的商业生命数量有所不同。其中,52%的人限制了面板大小,63%的人限制了全部或部分肿瘤。结论:多数保险政策限制性较强。临床指南的明确性和国家政策可以改善指南的一致性和地理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Personalized medicine
Personalized medicine 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Personalized Medicine (ISSN 1741-0541) translates recent genomic, genetic and proteomic advances into the clinical context. The journal provides an integrated forum for all players involved - academic and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, healthcare management organizations, patient organizations and others in the healthcare community. Personalized Medicine assists these parties to shape thefuture of medicine by providing a platform for expert commentary and analysis. The journal addresses scientific, commercial and policy issues in the field of precision medicine and includes news and views, current awareness regarding new biomarkers, concise commentary and analysis, reports from the conference circuit and full review articles.
期刊最新文献
Improving resource allocation in the precision medicine Era: a simulation-based approach using R Challenges and opportunities in building a health economic framework for personalized medicine in oncology. Developing and validating noninvasive prenatal testing for de novo autosomal dominant monogenic diseases in Vietnam. Budget impact and transferability of cost-effectiveness of DPYD testing in metastatic breast cancer in three health systems. Financial incentives to promote personalized medicine in Europe: an overview and guidance for implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1