Inter-organisational collaboration enabling care delivery in a specialist cancer surgery provider network: A qualitative study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Services Research & Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-07 DOI:10.1177/13558196211053954
Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Angus Ig Ramsay, Georgia Black, Ravi Barod, John Hines, Muntzer Mughal, David Shackley, Naomi J Fulop
{"title":"Inter-organisational collaboration enabling care delivery in a specialist cancer surgery provider network: A qualitative study.","authors":"Cecilia Vindrola-Padros,&nbsp;Angus Ig Ramsay,&nbsp;Georgia Black,&nbsp;Ravi Barod,&nbsp;John Hines,&nbsp;Muntzer Mughal,&nbsp;David Shackley,&nbsp;Naomi J Fulop","doi":"10.1177/13558196211053954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the processes, challenges and strategies used to govern and maintain inter-organisational collaboration between professionals in a provider network in London, United Kingdom, which implemented major system change focused on the centralisation of specialist cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a qualitative design involving interviews with stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 117), non-participant observations (<i>n</i> = 163) and documentary analysis (<i>n</i> = 100). We drew on an existing model of collaboration in healthcare organisations and expanded this framework by applying it to the analysis of collaboration in the context of major system change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Network provider organisations established shared goals, maintained central figures who could create and sustain collaboration, and promoted distributed forms of leadership. Still, organisations continued to encounter barriers or challenges in relation to developing opportunities for mutual acquaintanceship across all professional groups; the active sharing of knowledge, expertise and good practice across the network; the fostering of trust; and creation of information exchange infrastructures fit for collaborative purposes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Collaborative relationships changed over time, becoming stronger post-implementation in some areas, but continued to be negotiated where resistance to the centralisation remained. Future research should explore the sustainability of these relationships and further unpack how hierarchies and power relationships shape inter-organisational collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":"27 3","pages":"211-221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9277336/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196211053954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To explore the processes, challenges and strategies used to govern and maintain inter-organisational collaboration between professionals in a provider network in London, United Kingdom, which implemented major system change focused on the centralisation of specialist cancer surgery.

Methods: We used a qualitative design involving interviews with stakeholders (n = 117), non-participant observations (n = 163) and documentary analysis (n = 100). We drew on an existing model of collaboration in healthcare organisations and expanded this framework by applying it to the analysis of collaboration in the context of major system change.

Results: Network provider organisations established shared goals, maintained central figures who could create and sustain collaboration, and promoted distributed forms of leadership. Still, organisations continued to encounter barriers or challenges in relation to developing opportunities for mutual acquaintanceship across all professional groups; the active sharing of knowledge, expertise and good practice across the network; the fostering of trust; and creation of information exchange infrastructures fit for collaborative purposes.

Conclusion: Collaborative relationships changed over time, becoming stronger post-implementation in some areas, but continued to be negotiated where resistance to the centralisation remained. Future research should explore the sustainability of these relationships and further unpack how hierarchies and power relationships shape inter-organisational collaboration.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织间合作使专科癌症手术提供者网络中的护理服务:一项定性研究。
目的:探索用于管理和维护英国伦敦供应商网络中专业人员之间组织间合作的过程、挑战和策略,该网络实施了主要的系统变革,重点是专科癌症手术的集中。方法:我们采用了定性设计,包括对利益相关者的访谈(n = 117)、非参与者观察(n = 163)和文献分析(n = 100)。我们借鉴了医疗机构中现有的协作模式,并通过将其应用于主要系统变化背景下的协作分析来扩展该框架。结果:网络提供商组织建立了共同的目标,维护了能够创造和维持合作的核心人物,并促进了分布式领导形式。尽管如此,组织在发展所有专业群体相互认识的机会方面继续遇到障碍或挑战;在整个网络中积极分享知识、专业知识和良好做法;信任的培养;创建适合协作目的的信息交换基础设施。结论:随着时间的推移,协作关系发生了变化,在某些领域实施后变得更加强大,但在对集中化的抵制仍然存在的地方,协作关系仍在继续协商。未来的研究应该探索这些关系的可持续性,并进一步揭示等级制度和权力关系如何塑造组织间合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
期刊最新文献
Health care utilization and costs among coordinated care patients in Southeastern Ontario: A difference-in-differences study of a double propensity score-matched cohort. The role of collaborative governance in translating national cancer programs into network-based practices: A longitudinal case study in Canada. How can specialist investigation agencies inform system-wide learning for patient safety? A qualitative study of perspectives on the early years of the English healthcare safety investigation branch. What can the era of big data and big data analytics mean for health services research? Collaborative and integrated working between general practice and community pharmacies: A realist review of what works, for whom, and in which contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1