Authoritarian Regime Legitimacy and Health Care Provision: Survey Evidence from Contemporary China.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1215/03616878-9626894
Jane Duckett, Neil Munro
{"title":"Authoritarian Regime Legitimacy and Health Care Provision: Survey Evidence from Contemporary China.","authors":"Jane Duckett,&nbsp;Neil Munro","doi":"10.1215/03616878-9626894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Over the last two decades a growing body of research has shown that authoritarian regimes are trying to increase their legitimacy by providing public goods. But there has so far been very little research on whether or not these regimes are successful.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article analyzes data from a 2012-2013 nationally representative survey in China to examine whether health care provision bolsters the Communist regime's legitimacy. Using multivariate ordinal logistic regression, we test whether having public health insurance and being satisfied with the health care system are associated with separate measures of the People's Republic of China's regime legitimacy: support for \"our form of government\" (which we call \"system support\") and political trust.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Having public health insurance is positively associated with trust in the Chinese central government. Health care system satisfaction is positively associated with system support and trust in local government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health care provision may bolster the legitimacy of authoritarian regimes, with the clearest evidence showing that concrete benefits may translate into trust in the central government. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between trends in health care provision and legitimacy over time and in other types of authoritarian regime.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"47 3","pages":"375-409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9626894","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Context: Over the last two decades a growing body of research has shown that authoritarian regimes are trying to increase their legitimacy by providing public goods. But there has so far been very little research on whether or not these regimes are successful.

Methods: This article analyzes data from a 2012-2013 nationally representative survey in China to examine whether health care provision bolsters the Communist regime's legitimacy. Using multivariate ordinal logistic regression, we test whether having public health insurance and being satisfied with the health care system are associated with separate measures of the People's Republic of China's regime legitimacy: support for "our form of government" (which we call "system support") and political trust.

Findings: Having public health insurance is positively associated with trust in the Chinese central government. Health care system satisfaction is positively associated with system support and trust in local government.

Conclusions: Health care provision may bolster the legitimacy of authoritarian regimes, with the clearest evidence showing that concrete benefits may translate into trust in the central government. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between trends in health care provision and legitimacy over time and in other types of authoritarian regime.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专制政权合法性与医疗服务:来自当代中国的调查证据。
背景:在过去的二十年里,越来越多的研究表明,专制政权正试图通过提供公共产品来提高其合法性。但迄今为止,关于这些制度是否成功的研究很少。方法:本文分析了2012-2013年中国全国代表性调查的数据,以检验医疗保健提供是否支持了共产党政权的合法性。使用多元有序逻辑回归,我们测试了拥有公共医疗保险和对医疗保健系统的满意度是否与中华人民共和国政权合法性的单独措施相关:对“我们的政府形式”的支持(我们称之为“系统支持”)和政治信任。结果:拥有公共医疗保险与对中国中央政府的信任呈正相关。卫生保健系统满意度与系统支持度和地方政府信任度呈正相关。结论:医疗保健的提供可能会加强专制政权的合法性,最明确的证据表明,具体的利益可能会转化为对中央政府的信任。需要进一步研究,以了解卫生保健提供趋势与合法性之间的关系,随着时间的推移和在其他类型的专制政权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
期刊最新文献
Building Power for Health: The Grassroots Politics of Sustaining and Strengthening Medicaid. Closing Gaps or Holding Steady? The Affordable Care Act, Medicaid Expansion, and Racial Disparities in Coverage, 2010-2021. Entrenched Opportunity: Medicaid, Health Systems, and Solutions to Homelessness. Introduction: Medicaid at 60. Public Health Insurance Coverage for Immigrants during Pregnancy, Childhood, and Adulthood: A Discussion of Relevant Policies and Evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1