Modeling the Impact of Prehospital Triage on a True-Life Drip and Ship Mechanical Thrombectomy Urban Patient Cohort.

IF 2 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-25 DOI:10.1159/000520078
Stavros Matsoukas, Brian Giovanni, Liorah Rubinstein, Shahram Majidi, Laura K Stein, Johanna T Fifi
{"title":"Modeling the Impact of Prehospital Triage on a True-Life Drip and Ship Mechanical Thrombectomy Urban Patient Cohort.","authors":"Stavros Matsoukas,&nbsp;Brian Giovanni,&nbsp;Liorah Rubinstein,&nbsp;Shahram Majidi,&nbsp;Laura K Stein,&nbsp;Johanna T Fifi","doi":"10.1159/000520078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to model the effect of prehospital triage of emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) to endovascular capable center (ECC) on the timing of thrombectomy and intravenous (IV) thrombolysis using real-world data from a multihospital system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected a cohort of 77 consecutive stroke patients who were brought by emergency medical services (EMS) to a nonendovascular capable center and then transferred to an ECC for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) (\"actual\" drip and ship [DS] cohort). We created a hypothetical scenario (bypass model [BM]), modeling transfer of the patients directly to an ECC, based on patients' initial EMS pickup address and closest ECC. Using another cohort of 73 consecutive patients, who were brought directly to an ECC by EMS and underwent endovascular intervention, we calculated mean door-to-needle and door-to-arterial puncture (AP) times (\"actual\" mothership [MS] cohort). Timings in the actual MS cohort and the actual DS cohort were compared to timings from the BM cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median first medical contact (FMC) to IV thrombolysis time was 87.5 min (interquartile range [IQR] = 38) for the DS versus 78.5 min (IQR = 8.96) for the BM cohort, with p = 0.1672. Median FMC to AP was 244 min (IQR = 97) versus 147 min (IQR = 8.96) (p < 0.001), and median FMC to TICI 2B+ time was 299 min (IQR = 108.5) versus 197 min (IQR = 8.96) (p < 0.001) for the DS versus BM cohort, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modeled EMS prehospital triage of ELVO patients' results in shorter MT times without a change in thrombolysis times. As triage tools increase in sensitivity and specificity, EMS triage protocols stand to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45709,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","volume":"11 3","pages":"137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/30/cee-0011-0137.PMC8740215.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to model the effect of prehospital triage of emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) to endovascular capable center (ECC) on the timing of thrombectomy and intravenous (IV) thrombolysis using real-world data from a multihospital system.

Methods: We selected a cohort of 77 consecutive stroke patients who were brought by emergency medical services (EMS) to a nonendovascular capable center and then transferred to an ECC for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) ("actual" drip and ship [DS] cohort). We created a hypothetical scenario (bypass model [BM]), modeling transfer of the patients directly to an ECC, based on patients' initial EMS pickup address and closest ECC. Using another cohort of 73 consecutive patients, who were brought directly to an ECC by EMS and underwent endovascular intervention, we calculated mean door-to-needle and door-to-arterial puncture (AP) times ("actual" mothership [MS] cohort). Timings in the actual MS cohort and the actual DS cohort were compared to timings from the BM cohort.

Results: Median first medical contact (FMC) to IV thrombolysis time was 87.5 min (interquartile range [IQR] = 38) for the DS versus 78.5 min (IQR = 8.96) for the BM cohort, with p = 0.1672. Median FMC to AP was 244 min (IQR = 97) versus 147 min (IQR = 8.96) (p < 0.001), and median FMC to TICI 2B+ time was 299 min (IQR = 108.5) versus 197 min (IQR = 8.96) (p < 0.001) for the DS versus BM cohort, respectively.

Conclusions: Modeled EMS prehospital triage of ELVO patients' results in shorter MT times without a change in thrombolysis times. As triage tools increase in sensitivity and specificity, EMS triage protocols stand to improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟院前分诊对真实生活点滴和船舶机械取栓的城市患者队列的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是利用来自多医院系统的真实数据,模拟急诊大血管闭塞(ELVO)到血管内功能中心(ECC)的院前分诊对取栓和静脉溶栓时机的影响。方法:我们选择了一组77例连续卒中患者,这些患者由急诊医疗服务(EMS)带到无血管内功能中心,然后转移到ECC进行机械取栓(MT)(“实际”滴注和船[DS]队列)。我们创建了一个假设的场景(旁路模型[BM]),基于患者的初始EMS取车地址和最近的ECC,对患者直接转移到ECC进行建模。在另一组73例连续患者中,我们计算了平均门到针和门到动脉穿刺(AP)时间(“实际”母舰[MS]队列),这些患者直接被EMS送到ECC并接受血管内介入治疗。将实际MS队列和实际DS队列的时间与BM队列的时间进行比较。结果:DS组从首次医疗接触(FMC)到静脉溶栓的中位时间为87.5分钟(四分位数间距[IQR] = 38),而BM组为78.5分钟(IQR = 8.96), p = 0.1672。在DS组和BM组中,FMC到AP的中位时间分别为244分钟(IQR = 97)和147分钟(IQR = 8.96) (p < 0.001), FMC到TICI 2B+的中位时间分别为299分钟(IQR = 108.5)和197分钟(IQR = 8.96) (p < 0.001)。结论:ELVO患者的模拟EMS院前分诊结果缩短了MT时间,而没有改变溶栓时间。随着分诊工具的敏感性和特异性的提高,EMS分诊方案将改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of stroke and cerebrovascular research, drawing from a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. Offering an international forum, it meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues. The journal publishes original contributions, reviews of selected topics as well as clinical investigative studies. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears only if directly relevant to clinical issues. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Cerebrovascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Safety and Efficacy of Thrombectomy in Vietnamese Stroke Patients Selected Through Perfusion Imaging With an Onset Time Between 6-24 Hours. Intracerebral hemorrhage. Clinical Profile of Stroke Chameleons Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience. Waveform Analysis of STA-MCA Bypass graft in Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease. Predictors for Adherence to Recommended Anticoagulation after Stroke Unit Discharge in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1