CBM-I Training and Its Effect on Interpretations of Intent, Facial Expressions, Attention and Aggressive Behavior.

IF 1.8 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Europes Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2021-05-31 eCollection Date: 2021-05-01 DOI:10.5964/ejop.2413
Nouran AlMoghrabi, Ingmar H A Franken, Birgit Mayer, Menno van der Schoot, Jorg Huijding
{"title":"CBM-I Training and Its Effect on Interpretations of Intent, Facial Expressions, Attention and Aggressive Behavior.","authors":"Nouran AlMoghrabi,&nbsp;Ingmar H A Franken,&nbsp;Birgit Mayer,&nbsp;Menno van der Schoot,&nbsp;Jorg Huijding","doi":"10.5964/ejop.2413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is abundant evidence suggesting that attention and interpretation biases are powerful precursors of aggression. However, little is known how these biases may interact with one another in the development and maintenance of aggression. Using cognitive bias modification of interpretation (CBM-I), the present study examined whether training more pro-social or hostile intent attributions would affect attention bias, interpretation bias of facial expressions, aggression and mood. University students (17-48 years) were assigned to either a positive training (n = 40), negative training (n = 40), or control training (n = 40). Results showed that the positive training successfully changed measures of intent attributions in a pro-social direction compared to the control training. The negative training changed measures of intent attributions in a hostile direction but not more so than the control training. We found no generalization of the training effects to relevant other outcomes. Possible explanations underlying these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768478/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.2413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

There is abundant evidence suggesting that attention and interpretation biases are powerful precursors of aggression. However, little is known how these biases may interact with one another in the development and maintenance of aggression. Using cognitive bias modification of interpretation (CBM-I), the present study examined whether training more pro-social or hostile intent attributions would affect attention bias, interpretation bias of facial expressions, aggression and mood. University students (17-48 years) were assigned to either a positive training (n = 40), negative training (n = 40), or control training (n = 40). Results showed that the positive training successfully changed measures of intent attributions in a pro-social direction compared to the control training. The negative training changed measures of intent attributions in a hostile direction but not more so than the control training. We found no generalization of the training effects to relevant other outcomes. Possible explanations underlying these findings are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CBM-I训练及其对意图、面部表情、注意和攻击行为的影响
有大量证据表明,注意和解释偏见是攻击性的强大前兆。然而,这些偏见如何在攻击性的发展和维持中相互作用,我们知之甚少。本研究采用认知偏见修正解释(CBM-I),考察了亲社会或敌对意图归因训练是否会影响注意偏见、面部表情、攻击性和情绪的解释偏见。17-48岁的大学生被分为积极训练组(n = 40)、消极训练组(n = 40)和对照组(n = 40)。结果表明,与对照组训练相比,积极训练成功地将意向归因的测量结果向亲社会方向改变。负性训练对意图归因的影响是敌对的,但并不比控制训练的影响大。我们没有发现训练效果对其他相关结果的推广作用。讨论了这些发现背后可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Europes Journal of Psychology
Europes Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Ecological Approach to Conceptual Thinking in Material Engagement. Babies in the Corporeal Turn: The Cognitive Embodiment of Early Motor Development and Exploration in the Brazilian Context of Early Childhood Education. Gestures, Objects, and Spaces: Exploring Teachers' Multimodal Communication in Nursery Schools. Material Engagement Shaping Participation of Children on the Autism Spectrum: Embodiment and Subjectivity in Small-Group Learning. Materiality and Cognitive Development: Contemporary Debates and Empirical Studies in Early Childhood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1