{"title":"An interference model for visual working memory: Applications to the change detection task","authors":"Hsuan-Yu Lin , Klaus Oberauer","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most studies of visual-working memory employ one of two experimental paradigms: change-detection or continuous-stimulus reproduction. In this study, we extended the Interference Model (IM; Oberauer & Lin, 2017), which was designed for continuous reproduction, to the single-probe change-detection task. In continuous reproduction, participants occasionally report the non-target items instead of the target. The presence of non-target response is predicted by the Interference Model, which relies in part on the interference of non-target items to explain the set-size effect. By presenting a probe matching a non-target item, we can investigate the amount of interference from non-target items in change detection. As predicted by the Interference Model, we observed poorer performance in rejecting a probe matching a non-target item compared to a new probe (i.e., a cost due to intrusions from non-targets). We fitted the IM along with the Variable Precision, the Slot-Averaging, and the Neural-Population model to the data from two change-detection experiments. The models were equipped with a Bayesian decision rule based on the one used in Keshvari, van den Berg, and Ma (2013). The Interference Model and the Neural-Population model successfully predicted the set-size effect and the non-target intrusion cost, whereas the Variable Precision (VP) and Slot-Averaging (SA) models failed to predict the intrusion cost at all. Even with additional assumptions enabling VP and SA to produce intrusion costs, the IM still performed better than the competing models quantitatively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50669,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Psychology","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 101463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028522000019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Most studies of visual-working memory employ one of two experimental paradigms: change-detection or continuous-stimulus reproduction. In this study, we extended the Interference Model (IM; Oberauer & Lin, 2017), which was designed for continuous reproduction, to the single-probe change-detection task. In continuous reproduction, participants occasionally report the non-target items instead of the target. The presence of non-target response is predicted by the Interference Model, which relies in part on the interference of non-target items to explain the set-size effect. By presenting a probe matching a non-target item, we can investigate the amount of interference from non-target items in change detection. As predicted by the Interference Model, we observed poorer performance in rejecting a probe matching a non-target item compared to a new probe (i.e., a cost due to intrusions from non-targets). We fitted the IM along with the Variable Precision, the Slot-Averaging, and the Neural-Population model to the data from two change-detection experiments. The models were equipped with a Bayesian decision rule based on the one used in Keshvari, van den Berg, and Ma (2013). The Interference Model and the Neural-Population model successfully predicted the set-size effect and the non-target intrusion cost, whereas the Variable Precision (VP) and Slot-Averaging (SA) models failed to predict the intrusion cost at all. Even with additional assumptions enabling VP and SA to produce intrusion costs, the IM still performed better than the competing models quantitatively.
大多数视觉工作记忆的研究采用两种实验范式之一:变化检测或连续刺激再现。在本研究中,我们扩展了干涉模型(IM;Oberauer,Lin, 2017),它是为连续复制而设计的,到单探针变化检测任务。在连续复制过程中,参与者偶尔会报告非目标项目而不是目标项目。干扰模型预测了非目标反应的存在,该模型部分依赖于非目标项目的干扰来解释集合大小效应。通过提出一个与非目标项匹配的探针,我们可以研究非目标项在变化检测中的干扰量。正如干扰模型所预测的那样,我们观察到在拒绝与非目标项目匹配的探针时,与新探针相比,性能较差(即,由于来自非目标的入侵而产生的成本)。我们将IM与可变精度、槽平均和神经种群模型一起拟合到两个变化检测实验的数据中。这些模型配备了一个基于Keshvari, van den Berg, and Ma(2013)中使用的贝叶斯决策规则。干扰模型和神经种群模型成功预测了集大小效应和非目标入侵成本,而变精度(VP)和间隔平均(SA)模型完全无法预测入侵成本。即使有额外的假设使VP和SA产生入侵成本,IM仍然比竞争模型在数量上表现得更好。
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Psychology is concerned with advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Psychology specializes in extensive articles that have a major impact on cognitive theory and provide new theoretical advances.
Research Areas include:
• Artificial intelligence
• Developmental psychology
• Linguistics
• Neurophysiology
• Social psychology.