Comparison of the eficacy of epidural steroid injection applied in cervical and lumbar regions.

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14744/agri.2022.46872
Halil Çetingök, Meltem Kanar
{"title":"Comparison of the eficacy of epidural steroid injection applied in cervical and lumbar regions.","authors":"Halil Çetingök,&nbsp;Meltem Kanar","doi":"10.14744/agri.2022.46872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Epidural injections have been used for many years in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with chronic backleg pain and chronic neck-arm pain. We aimed to compare the efficacy of lumbar and cervical epidural steroid injections on pain palliation, duration of pain relief and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a Retrospective, observational single-center study. A total of 159 patients (96 females, 63 males) who were performed epidural steroid injections in cervical and lumbar regions were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as lumbar epidural steroid injection 'Group 1' and cervical epidural steroid injection 'Group 2'. We retrospectively evaluated the patients for numerical rating scale (NRS) prior and after the injection, the duration of the pain relief, whether any complication occured related to injection and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>130 patients in Group 1 and 29 patients in Group 2 were evaluated. Median NRS before the procedure: 8 in Group 1, 7 in Group 2 and median NRS after the procedure: 3 in Group 1, 4 in group 2. Patient satisfaction with the procedure 56.15% in Group 1 and 48.62% in Group 2. Mean duration of pain relief 7.23 months in Group 1 and 8.17 months in Group 2. There were no statistically significant difference in the evaluated parameters between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was observed that the pain relief, duration of pain relief and patient satisfaction were similar for cervical and lumbar epidural steroid injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":45603,"journal":{"name":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"34 1","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri-The Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2022.46872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Epidural injections have been used for many years in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with chronic backleg pain and chronic neck-arm pain. We aimed to compare the efficacy of lumbar and cervical epidural steroid injections on pain palliation, duration of pain relief and patient satisfaction.

Methods: This is a Retrospective, observational single-center study. A total of 159 patients (96 females, 63 males) who were performed epidural steroid injections in cervical and lumbar regions were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as lumbar epidural steroid injection 'Group 1' and cervical epidural steroid injection 'Group 2'. We retrospectively evaluated the patients for numerical rating scale (NRS) prior and after the injection, the duration of the pain relief, whether any complication occured related to injection and patient satisfaction.

Results: 130 patients in Group 1 and 29 patients in Group 2 were evaluated. Median NRS before the procedure: 8 in Group 1, 7 in Group 2 and median NRS after the procedure: 3 in Group 1, 4 in group 2. Patient satisfaction with the procedure 56.15% in Group 1 and 48.62% in Group 2. Mean duration of pain relief 7.23 months in Group 1 and 8.17 months in Group 2. There were no statistically significant difference in the evaluated parameters between the two groups.

Conclusion: It was observed that the pain relief, duration of pain relief and patient satisfaction were similar for cervical and lumbar epidural steroid injections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硬膜外类固醇注射用于颈椎和腰椎的疗效比较。
目的:硬膜外注射多年来一直用于治疗慢性背痛和慢性颈臂痛患者的慢性疼痛。我们的目的是比较腰椎和颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射在疼痛缓解、疼痛缓解持续时间和患者满意度方面的疗效。方法:这是一项回顾性、观察性单中心研究。本研究共纳入159例患者(96例女性,63例男性),这些患者在颈椎和腰椎区域接受硬膜外类固醇注射。患者分为腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射组(1组)和颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射组(2组)。我们回顾性评估患者注射前后的数值评定量表(NRS)、疼痛缓解的持续时间、是否发生与注射相关的并发症和患者满意度。结果:1组130例,2组29例。手术前中位NRS: 1组8,2组7,手术后中位NRS: 1组3,2组4。组1患者满意度为56.15%,组2患者满意度为48.62%。1组平均疼痛缓解时间7.23个月,2组平均疼痛缓解时间8.17个月。两组间各项评价指标差异无统计学意义。结论:颈椎和腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射的镇痛效果、镇痛持续时间和患者满意度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Percutaneous fluoroscopic lumbar facet joint synovial cyst aspiration for manifesting with radiculopathy and low back pain. Evaluation of the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency therapy in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain: An analysis of single-center data. The effectiveness of the erector spinae plane block using methylprednisolone and bupivacaine in post-herpetic neuralgia: Case series. The effect of consecutive facet medial branch radiofrequency denervation and dorsal root ganglion pulse radiofrequency therapy on lumbar facet joint pain. [Pain beliefs of cancer patients and associated factors].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1