Spinal or Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Spinal Anesthesia with Chloroprocaine in Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopies: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2021-11-20 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S324876
Margaretha B Breebaart, Lies Saerens, Jordi Branders, Sari Casaer, Luc Sermeus, Patrick Van Houwe
{"title":"Spinal or Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Spinal Anesthesia with Chloroprocaine in Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopies: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial.","authors":"Margaretha B Breebaart,&nbsp;Lies Saerens,&nbsp;Jordi Branders,&nbsp;Sari Casaer,&nbsp;Luc Sermeus,&nbsp;Patrick Van Houwe","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S324876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chloroprocaine provides spinal anesthesia for day-case surgery lasting up to 40 minutes. Intravenous and spinal dexmedetomidine can prolong spinal anesthesia, but no data are available for the combination with chloroprocaine. This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares chloroprocaine with spinal or intravenous dexmedetomidine regarding block characteristics, micturition, and discharge times.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>After ethical approval and informed consent, 135 patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive either 40mg spinal chloroprocaine (Chloro-group), 40mg chloroprocaine with 5 mcg spinal dexmedetomidine (Spinal Dex-group) or 40mg chloroprocaine with 0.5 mcg/kg IV dexmedetomidine (IV DEXgroup). Block characteristics, hemodynamic variables and the use of analgesics were registered. Voiding and discharge times were noted. A scoring system was used for micturition problems and sedation. Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) and other late side effects were evaluated after one week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data were similar between groups. Block onset times and intensity of motor block were comparable between groups. The time to L2 and Bromage 1 regression was prolonged in the SpinalDEx-group by approximately 30 minutes compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). First voiding as well as discharge from the hospital was prolonged in the Spinal Dex-group by approximately 40 minutes p < 0.01. There was no significant difference between groups regarding treatment of hypotension, sedation, micturition problems or the use of postoperative analgesics (P > 0.8). One patient experienced TNS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intrathecal but not intravenous (0.5 mcg/kg) dexmedetomidine can prolong chloroprocaine (40mg) spinal anesthesia when surgery is expected to last over 40 minutes. Despite a similar incidence of adverse effects, this also led to a postponed hospital discharge time.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"14 ","pages":"153-160"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/13/lra-14-153.PMC8612665.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S324876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chloroprocaine provides spinal anesthesia for day-case surgery lasting up to 40 minutes. Intravenous and spinal dexmedetomidine can prolong spinal anesthesia, but no data are available for the combination with chloroprocaine. This double-blind randomized controlled trial compares chloroprocaine with spinal or intravenous dexmedetomidine regarding block characteristics, micturition, and discharge times.

Patients and methods: After ethical approval and informed consent, 135 patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy were randomized to receive either 40mg spinal chloroprocaine (Chloro-group), 40mg chloroprocaine with 5 mcg spinal dexmedetomidine (Spinal Dex-group) or 40mg chloroprocaine with 0.5 mcg/kg IV dexmedetomidine (IV DEXgroup). Block characteristics, hemodynamic variables and the use of analgesics were registered. Voiding and discharge times were noted. A scoring system was used for micturition problems and sedation. Transient neurological symptoms (TNS) and other late side effects were evaluated after one week.

Results: Demographic data were similar between groups. Block onset times and intensity of motor block were comparable between groups. The time to L2 and Bromage 1 regression was prolonged in the SpinalDEx-group by approximately 30 minutes compared to the other groups (p < 0.01). First voiding as well as discharge from the hospital was prolonged in the Spinal Dex-group by approximately 40 minutes p < 0.01. There was no significant difference between groups regarding treatment of hypotension, sedation, micturition problems or the use of postoperative analgesics (P > 0.8). One patient experienced TNS.

Conclusion: Intrathecal but not intravenous (0.5 mcg/kg) dexmedetomidine can prolong chloroprocaine (40mg) spinal anesthesia when surgery is expected to last over 40 minutes. Despite a similar incidence of adverse effects, this also led to a postponed hospital discharge time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓或静脉注射右美托咪定与氯丙卡因用于膝关节置换术的脊髓麻醉:一项双盲随机试验。
目的:氯普鲁卡因为日间手术提供长达40分钟的脊髓麻醉。静脉注射和脊髓注射右美托咪定可延长脊髓麻醉时间,但与氯普鲁卡因联用没有相关数据。这项双盲随机对照试验比较氯普鲁卡因与脊髓或静脉注射右美托咪定在阻滞特征、排尿和排泄时间方面的差异。患者和方法:经伦理批准和知情同意后,135例膝关节镜患者随机接受40mg氯普鲁卡因(氯组)、40mg氯普鲁卡因加5mcg右美托咪定(脊髓右美托咪定组)或40mg氯普鲁卡因加0.5 mcg/kg静脉右美托咪定(静脉右美托咪定组)治疗。记录阻滞特征、血流动力学变量和镇痛药的使用。记录排尿和出院时间。排尿问题和镇静使用评分系统。一周后评估短暂性神经症状(TNS)和其他晚期副作用。结果:组间人口学数据相似。两组间阻滞发作时间和运动阻滞强度具有可比性。与其他组相比,spinaldex组的L2和Bromage 1回归时间延长了约30分钟(p < 0.01)。Spinal dex组首次排尿和出院时间延长约40分钟,p < 0.01。两组患者在低血压、镇静、排尿问题及术后镇痛药使用方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.8)。一名患者经历了TNS。结论:当手术时间超过40分钟时,鞘内注射右美托咪定可延长氯普鲁卡因(40mg)脊髓麻醉时间,但静脉注射(0.5 mcg/kg)无效。尽管不良反应发生率相似,但这也导致了出院时间的推迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Modified-Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through a Perichondral Approach in a Patient Undergoing Bilateral Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Case Report. Foot Drop Following a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block with Ropivacaine, A Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study. Current Status and Global Trend of Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Use of Local Anaesthetics Among Non-Anaesthesia Healthcare Professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1