Does the d2 Test of Attention only assess sustained attention? Evidence of working memory processes involved.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-08 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152
Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo
{"title":"Does the d2 Test of Attention only assess sustained attention? Evidence of working memory processes involved.","authors":"Leandro da Silva-Sauer, Ricardo Basso Garcia, Alan Ehrich de Moura, Bernardino Fernández-Calvo","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (<i>p</i> < .05; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (<i>p</i> = .01; <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .20) and experimental group (<i>p</i> = .02, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":50741,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.2023152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The d2 Test of Attention (d2) is widely used for assessing sustained attention and we aimed at verifying whether working memory may be a secondary construct measured by d2. 70 university students were assessed using d2 conventional paper-and-pencil and computational version. The experimental group and control group performed the task with or without target key, respectively. Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and N-back (1 and 2-back) tasks were used to measure sustained attention and working memory, respectively. Computational d2 performance was predicted by CPT (p < .05; R2 = .15) in the experimental group, and it was predicted by 2-back (p < .05; R2 = .28) in the control group. Conventional d2 performance was predicted by 2-back for both control group (p = .01; R2 = .20) and experimental group (p = .02, R2 = .17). Results suggest the involvement of working memory in d2, possibly a secondary construct assessed by this instrument.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
d2 注意力测试只评估持续注意吗?涉及工作记忆过程的证据。
d2 注意力测验(d2)被广泛用于评估持续注意,我们的目的是验证工作记忆是否可能是 d2 测定的二级结构。我们使用传统纸笔版和计算版 d2 对 70 名大学生进行了评估。实验组和对照组分别在有目标键或无目标键的情况下完成任务。持续表现测试(CPT)和N-back(1和2-back)任务分别用于测量持续注意力和工作记忆。在实验组中,计算 d2 成绩是由 CPT 预测的(p < .05;R2 = .15),而在对照组中,计算 d2 成绩是由 2-back 预测的(p < .05;R2 = .28)。对照组(p = .01; R2 = .20)和实验组(p = .02, R2 = .17)的常规 d2 成绩均可通过 2-back 预测。结果表明,工作记忆参与了 d2,这可能是该工具评估的次要结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Comparative analysis of freestanding and embedded performance validity tests ERP biomarkers for go/no-go tasks to detect potential cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults Comparison of the GAD-7 and ImPACT symptom cluster scores in measuring anxiety among college athletes. Psychometric validation of the Italian Self-Report Symptoms inventory (SRSI): Factor structure, construct validity, and diagnostic accuracy. Exploring symptomatology and innovative treatment modalities for prefrontal cortex lesions: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1