Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood questionnaire.

Q3 Medicine Child Health Nursing Research Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-30 DOI:10.4094/chnr.2021.27.3.256
Hyewon Shin, Minjoo Hong, Minjeong Jo, Jungmin Lee
{"title":"Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood questionnaire.","authors":"Hyewon Shin, Minjoo Hong, Minjeong Jo, Jungmin Lee","doi":"10.4094/chnr.2021.27.3.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study presents a translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of two instruments of the Fertility Awareness and Attitudes Towards Parenthood (FAAP) questionnaire (Conditions and Life changes) for use in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This methodological study included 166 university students for psychometric evaluation in the sixth step. The first five steps included forward translation, backward translation, committee review, assessment of content validity, and a pre-test. In the sixth step, psychometric properties, including internal consistency, construct validity, and criterion validity, were evaluated. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to identify the structure of the tool and to assess its validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Korean version showed acceptable internal consistency. Cronbach's ⍺ was .73 for FAAPC-conditions and .83 for FAAP-Life changes. FAAP-Conditions showed a four-factor structure (social conditions, relationship with partner, external environment, and child-rearing support) and FAAP-Life changes had a two-factor structure (reward and burden). In the confirmatory analysis, CMIN/DF, TLI, IFI, SRMR, CFI, and RMSEA were satisfactory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided preliminary evidence of the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Korean version of the FAAP questionnaire in university students in South Korea. Nonetheless, further evaluation among Korean young adults is warranted to validate this instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":37360,"journal":{"name":"Child Health Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/11/chnr-27-3-256.PMC8650856.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Health Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2021.27.3.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents a translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of two instruments of the Fertility Awareness and Attitudes Towards Parenthood (FAAP) questionnaire (Conditions and Life changes) for use in South Korea.

Methods: This methodological study included 166 university students for psychometric evaluation in the sixth step. The first five steps included forward translation, backward translation, committee review, assessment of content validity, and a pre-test. In the sixth step, psychometric properties, including internal consistency, construct validity, and criterion validity, were evaluated. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to identify the structure of the tool and to assess its validity.

Results: The Korean version showed acceptable internal consistency. Cronbach's ⍺ was .73 for FAAPC-conditions and .83 for FAAP-Life changes. FAAP-Conditions showed a four-factor structure (social conditions, relationship with partner, external environment, and child-rearing support) and FAAP-Life changes had a two-factor structure (reward and burden). In the confirmatory analysis, CMIN/DF, TLI, IFI, SRMR, CFI, and RMSEA were satisfactory.

Conclusion: This study provided preliminary evidence of the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Korean version of the FAAP questionnaire in university students in South Korea. Nonetheless, further evaluation among Korean young adults is warranted to validate this instrument.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生育意识和为人父母态度问卷韩文版的翻译和心理测量评估。
目的:本研究介绍了在韩国使用的生育意识和生育态度(FAAP)问卷(条件和生活变化)的两种工具的翻译、文化适应和心理测量评估:这项方法研究包括 166 名大学生,在第六步进行心理测量评估。前五个步骤包括正译、反译、委员会审查、内容效度评估和预测试。在第六步中,对心理测量特性进行了评估,包括内部一致性、建构效度和标准效度。为了确定工具的结构并评估其有效性,还进行了探索性因子分析和确认性因子分析:结果:韩文版显示了可接受的内部一致性。FAAPC-条件的 Cronbach's ⍺ 为 0.73,FAAP-生活变化的 Cronbach's ⍺ 为 0.83。FAAP-条件显示了四因素结构(社会条件、与伴侣的关系、外部环境和育儿支持),FAAP-生活变化显示了双因素结构(奖励和负担)。在确证分析中,CMIN/DF、TLI、IFI、SRMR、CFI 和 RMSEA 均令人满意:本研究初步证明了韩文版 FAAP 问卷在韩国大学生中的可接受性、可靠性和有效性。尽管如此,仍有必要在韩国年轻人中进行进一步评估,以验证该工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Health Nursing Research
Child Health Nursing Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of nursing students' reflection levels before and after debriefing in simulation training in South Korea: qualitative analysis design. Evaluation of a child abuse prevention program for unmarried mothers in South Korea: a single-case experimental design. Incidence of falls and fall-related characteristics in hospitalized children in South Korea: a descriptive study. South Korean first-time mothers' knowledge of digestive health problems in infancy and their utilization of health care facilities for digestive health concerns: a descriptive study. What makes a good reviewer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1