Evaluation of Newly Developed Double-layer Composite Resin Teeth for Crown Preparation Training.

Xuan Qi, Xiao Li Li, Yang Yang, Li Chen, Jian Guo Tan
{"title":"Evaluation of Newly Developed Double-layer Composite Resin Teeth for Crown Preparation Training.","authors":"Xuan Qi,&nbsp;Xiao Li Li,&nbsp;Yang Yang,&nbsp;Li Chen,&nbsp;Jian Guo Tan","doi":"10.3290/j.cjdr.b2440855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the crown preparation performance of preclinical dental students training with conventional composite resin teeth and newly developed double-layer composite resin teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The newly developed composite resin teeth consisted of two layers with different colours and hardnesses. Twenty third-year undergraduate dental students (8 men, 12 women) were randomly assigned to the control group (Group 1, using conventional composite resin teeth; n = 10) or the experimental group (Group 2, using double-layer composite resin teeth; n = 10) to prepare metal-ceramic crowns. To practice, each student prepared one tooth per day for 2 days. For the baseline test and final test before and after the practice period, both groups used traditional teeth. The operation time was recorded and the prepared teeth were scored blindly by two experienced instructors. The time and scores were compared within and between groups to determine the difference (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students in both groups spent less time (P < 0.05) and achieved better scores (P < 0.001) on the final test than the baseline test (P < 0.01). In the final test, no significant difference in operating time was found between the two groups (P > 0.05), but Group 2 yielded significantly higher scores (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training with the double-layer composite resin teeth enabled students to progress more quickly in terms of operating time and achieve higher scores. Use of this newly-developed tooth in crown preparation teaching practice therefore yields highly promising results.</p>","PeriodicalId":74983,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","volume":"24 4","pages":"275-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b2440855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the crown preparation performance of preclinical dental students training with conventional composite resin teeth and newly developed double-layer composite resin teeth.

Methods: The newly developed composite resin teeth consisted of two layers with different colours and hardnesses. Twenty third-year undergraduate dental students (8 men, 12 women) were randomly assigned to the control group (Group 1, using conventional composite resin teeth; n = 10) or the experimental group (Group 2, using double-layer composite resin teeth; n = 10) to prepare metal-ceramic crowns. To practice, each student prepared one tooth per day for 2 days. For the baseline test and final test before and after the practice period, both groups used traditional teeth. The operation time was recorded and the prepared teeth were scored blindly by two experienced instructors. The time and scores were compared within and between groups to determine the difference (α = 0.05).

Results: Students in both groups spent less time (P < 0.05) and achieved better scores (P < 0.001) on the final test than the baseline test (P < 0.01). In the final test, no significant difference in operating time was found between the two groups (P > 0.05), but Group 2 yielded significantly higher scores (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Training with the double-layer composite resin teeth enabled students to progress more quickly in terms of operating time and achieve higher scores. Use of this newly-developed tooth in crown preparation teaching practice therefore yields highly promising results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新研制的双层复合树脂牙用于冠预备训练的评价。
目的:评价和比较常规复合树脂牙与新开发的双层复合树脂牙在临床前牙学生培养中的冠制备性能。方法:采用两层不同颜色和硬度的复合树脂牙。将23名牙科本科学生(男8名,女12名)随机分为对照组(第一组,使用常规复合树脂牙;n = 10)或实验组(第2组,采用双层复合树脂牙;N = 10)制备金属陶瓷冠。为了练习,每个学生每天准备一颗牙齿,连续2天。在练习前后的基线测试和最终测试中,两组均使用传统牙齿。由两名经验丰富的指导员记录手术时间,并对准备好的牙齿进行盲目评分。比较组内和组间时间和评分差异(α = 0.05)。结果:两组学生在期末测试中花费的时间均少于基线测试(P < 0.05),取得的成绩均优于基线测试(P < 0.01)。两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但第2组得分显著高于第2组(P < 0.05)。结论:使用双层复合树脂牙进行训练,学生在操作时间上进步更快,成绩更高。因此,在冠预备的教学实践中使用这种新开发的牙齿会产生很好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Chairside CAD/CAM and Its Influencing Factors among Chinese Dental Practitioners: a Crosssectional Study. CB1 Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells by Enhancing Mitochondrial Transfer of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Establishment of an Animal Model of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invading the Mandible. GREM1 Negatively Regulates Osteo-/Dentinogenic Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells via Association with YWHAH. PHD2 shRNA-Modified Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Facilitate Periodontal Bone Repair in Response to Inflammatory Condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1