The potential effect of the updated national criteria on adult cochlear implantation in England and Wales.

IF 1.2 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2021.2009212
James D Constable, Stephen J Broomfield, Elisa Romeo, Philip J Clamp
{"title":"The potential effect of the updated national criteria on adult cochlear implantation in England and Wales.","authors":"James D Constable,&nbsp;Stephen J Broomfield,&nbsp;Elisa Romeo,&nbsp;Philip J Clamp","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2021.2009212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Following an update of 'old' TA166 guidance (March 2019), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) predicted a 70% increase in cochlear implantation (CI). We investigated the effect of the 'new' TA566 criteria on adult CI at our regional centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult CI assessments between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2018 (before new criteria) and between 7th March 2019 and 31st August 2019 (after new criteria) were retrospectively examined. Calculated eligibility and uptake rates predicted change in annual implantation under the new guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>552 patients were identified in the first study period, with a median of 148 assessments per year. Of 533 with complete assessments, 58% were eligible, of whom 74% were implanted. Retrospective application of the new criteria was possible for 277 patients; eligibility and uptake were 67% and 80%, respectively. In the second study period (n = 60), new criteria eligibility was 62% and uptake was 78%. Increased eligibility under the new criteria predicts an increase of between 13 and 23% in annual adult implantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate increased implant eligibility under the latest NICE guidance. Assuming consistent referral patterns, our predicted increase in adult implantation is considerably less than that predicted elsewhere.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"23 3","pages":"119-124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2021.2009212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Following an update of 'old' TA166 guidance (March 2019), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) predicted a 70% increase in cochlear implantation (CI). We investigated the effect of the 'new' TA566 criteria on adult CI at our regional centre.

Methods: Adult CI assessments between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2018 (before new criteria) and between 7th March 2019 and 31st August 2019 (after new criteria) were retrospectively examined. Calculated eligibility and uptake rates predicted change in annual implantation under the new guidance.

Results: 552 patients were identified in the first study period, with a median of 148 assessments per year. Of 533 with complete assessments, 58% were eligible, of whom 74% were implanted. Retrospective application of the new criteria was possible for 277 patients; eligibility and uptake were 67% and 80%, respectively. In the second study period (n = 60), new criteria eligibility was 62% and uptake was 78%. Increased eligibility under the new criteria predicts an increase of between 13 and 23% in annual adult implantation.

Conclusions: We demonstrate increased implant eligibility under the latest NICE guidance. Assuming consistent referral patterns, our predicted increase in adult implantation is considerably less than that predicted elsewhere.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新后的国家标准对英格兰和威尔士成人耳蜗植入的潜在影响。
目标:在更新“旧”TA166指南(2019年3月)之后,国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)预测人工耳蜗植入(CI)增加70%。我们调查了“新”TA566标准对我们区域中心成人CI的影响。方法:回顾性分析2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日(新标准出台前)和2019年3月7日至2019年8月31日(新标准出台后)的成人CI评估。计算出的合格性和吸收率预测了新指南下每年植入量的变化。结果:在第一个研究期间,552例患者被确定,平均每年评估148例。在完成评估的533人中,58%符合条件,其中74%植入。277例患者可以回顾性应用新标准;入选率和接受率分别为67%和80%。在第二个研究期间(n = 60),新标准合格率为62%,接受率为78%。在新标准下,增加的资格预计每年成人植入增加13%至23%。结论:在最新的NICE指导下,我们证明了种植体的适宜性。假设一致的转诊模式,我们预测的成人植入的增加大大低于其他地方的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
期刊最新文献
The utility of the cognitive Mini-Mental State Examination and the Stroop Color and Word Test in explaining variations in speech perception outcomes among adult cochlear implant users: A pilot study. Multidisciplinary aspects of pediatric cochlear implantation: anesthesiological considerations. The effect of an online music program on children with cochlear implants' vocabulary, and maternal stress, and the role of the acoustic environment. Vision-based object detection and tracking from surgical microscope video for augmented cochlear implant surgery. Audiologist perspectives on a regional telehealth model for cochlear implant follow-up care: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1