Validation of a brief version of the Resilience Scale for Adults on an Italian non-clinical sample.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Rivista di psichiatria Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1708/3713.37044
Rodolfo Rossi, Valentina Socci, Tommaso B Jannini, Alberto Collazzoni, Francesca Pacitti, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Alessandro Rossi
{"title":"Validation of a brief version of the Resilience Scale for Adults on an Italian non-clinical sample.","authors":"Rodolfo Rossi,&nbsp;Valentina Socci,&nbsp;Tommaso B Jannini,&nbsp;Alberto Collazzoni,&nbsp;Francesca Pacitti,&nbsp;Giorgio Di Lorenzo,&nbsp;Alessandro Rossi","doi":"10.1708/3713.37044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) is a self-administered 7-point Likert scale of 33 items, structured in 6 factors measuring personal and interpersonal resources. We aimed to develop and validate a brief form of the RSA, in order to produce a short, fast and handy tool for assessing resilience.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A non-clinical sample of 500 university students was recruited using a research website. Reduction of the RSA-33 was performed using an item response theory (IRT) analysis by means of a Graded Response Model (GRM) protocol on the 6 RSA factors separately. After the IRT reduction process, a Pearson's correlation matrix of the original RSA-33 and the reduced version was estimated. Finally, a CFA was estimated to assess factorial validity. The estimation of item discrimination from the GRM ranged from 0.69 and 5.94 and allowed to retain 11 items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both the original RSA-33 and the brief RSA-11, the strongest correlations were between Family Cohesion and Social Resources factors. CFA was estimated to assess factorial validity in a simplified model with two latent first-order factors, i.e., Personal and Contextual resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability of short and psychometrically robust measures is needed to improve evaluation and monitoring in mental health programs. For this reason, we provided a brief and effective tool to assess resilience resources in both research and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":"56 6","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/3713.37044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: The Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) is a self-administered 7-point Likert scale of 33 items, structured in 6 factors measuring personal and interpersonal resources. We aimed to develop and validate a brief form of the RSA, in order to produce a short, fast and handy tool for assessing resilience.

Materials and methods: A non-clinical sample of 500 university students was recruited using a research website. Reduction of the RSA-33 was performed using an item response theory (IRT) analysis by means of a Graded Response Model (GRM) protocol on the 6 RSA factors separately. After the IRT reduction process, a Pearson's correlation matrix of the original RSA-33 and the reduced version was estimated. Finally, a CFA was estimated to assess factorial validity. The estimation of item discrimination from the GRM ranged from 0.69 and 5.94 and allowed to retain 11 items.

Results: For both the original RSA-33 and the brief RSA-11, the strongest correlations were between Family Cohesion and Social Resources factors. CFA was estimated to assess factorial validity in a simplified model with two latent first-order factors, i.e., Personal and Contextual resources.

Conclusions: The availability of short and psychometrically robust measures is needed to improve evaluation and monitoring in mental health programs. For this reason, we provided a brief and effective tool to assess resilience resources in both research and clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在意大利非临床样本上验证成人弹性量表的简要版本。
目的:成人心理弹性量表(RSA)是一种自编的7点李克特量表,共有33个项目,由6个因素构成,衡量个人和人际资源。我们的目标是开发和验证RSA的简短形式,以产生一个简短、快速和方便的工具来评估弹性。材料和方法:通过一个研究网站招募了500名大学生作为非临床样本。采用项目反应理论(IRT)分析,采用分级反应模型(GRM)协议分别对6个RSA因子进行RSA-33的降低。经过IRT约简过程后,估计原始RSA-33与约简版本的Pearson相关矩阵。最后,估计CFA来评估析因效度。从GRM估计的项目区分范围在0.69和5.94之间,允许保留11个项目。结果:在原始的RSA-33和简短的RSA-11中,家庭凝聚力和社会资源因素之间的相关性最强。估计CFA在简化模型中评估因子效度,其中包含两个潜在的一阶因素,即个人和环境资源。结论:需要短期和心理计量学上可靠的测量方法来改善心理健康项目的评估和监测。出于这个原因,我们提供了一个简短而有效的工具来评估研究和临床环境中的弹性资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
期刊最新文献
[Real-time experiences, physical activity, and biological outcomes in the personal recovery of patients in mental health supported accommodations: a non-randomized multicenter clinical trial.] SonoMind: deep learning-based voice analysis for mental health monitoring. Growth and neuropsychological developmental correlates in children with autism and cerebral palsy - a pilot study. Work-related stress in personnel of law enforcement: umbrella review. A distressing near-death experience with veridical perceptions during coma: psychiatric and clinical reflections from a rare case.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1