Selective adoption of therapeutic devices among people with type 1 diabetes.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Sociology Review Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1080/14461242.2021.2007160
Alberto Ardissone
{"title":"Selective adoption of therapeutic devices among people with type 1 diabetes.","authors":"Alberto Ardissone","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2021.2007160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper contributes to the debate regarding the adoption/rejection of technologies by focusing on the selective use of therapeutic devices among people with type 1 diabetes. I show that patients often refuse to use a device (either insulin pumps or sensors for glycaemic control), despite suggestions from diabetologists. The study was conducted in Italy in 2019. Theoretically, the paper relied on a perspective that amalgamates actor-network theory and postphenomenology around the key concept of multistability. I then detected the three main features of stabilities that explain device use/non-use: relation to embodied users, contextual embedment (within larger social assemblages), concrete tailoring. Findings helped to stress the relevance of not only focusing on the type of device and its technical functioning, but also unveiling the underlying ongoing and situated socio-technical processes. Selective adoption of devices should be investigated at the level of the whole patient-device assemblage in order to assess the diverse stabilities that may arise from such networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2021.2007160","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper contributes to the debate regarding the adoption/rejection of technologies by focusing on the selective use of therapeutic devices among people with type 1 diabetes. I show that patients often refuse to use a device (either insulin pumps or sensors for glycaemic control), despite suggestions from diabetologists. The study was conducted in Italy in 2019. Theoretically, the paper relied on a perspective that amalgamates actor-network theory and postphenomenology around the key concept of multistability. I then detected the three main features of stabilities that explain device use/non-use: relation to embodied users, contextual embedment (within larger social assemblages), concrete tailoring. Findings helped to stress the relevance of not only focusing on the type of device and its technical functioning, but also unveiling the underlying ongoing and situated socio-technical processes. Selective adoption of devices should be investigated at the level of the whole patient-device assemblage in order to assess the diverse stabilities that may arise from such networks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1型糖尿病患者选择性采用治疗设备。
本文通过关注1型糖尿病患者对治疗设备的选择性使用,为关于采用/拒绝技术的辩论做出了贡献。我指出,患者经常拒绝使用设备(胰岛素泵或血糖控制传感器),尽管糖尿病专家建议。该研究于2019年在意大利进行。在理论上,本文围绕多重稳定性这一关键概念,采用了行动者网络理论和后现象学相结合的视角。然后,我发现了解释设备使用/不使用的稳定性的三个主要特征:与具体化用户的关系,上下文嵌入(在更大的社会组合中),具体剪裁。调查结果有助于强调不仅关注设备类型及其技术功能的相关性,而且还揭示了潜在的正在进行的和处于环境中的社会技术过程。应该在整个患者-器械组合的水平上对器械的选择性采用进行调查,以评估这种网络可能产生的各种稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Drug consumption stigma and patient legitimacy: experiences of people who use drugs seeking care for chronic non-cancer pain in Nigeria. Gut feelings and lived experiences: a qualitative study of 'anti-diet' dietitians' and psychologists' motivations and experiences regarding the weight-neutral approach. Shifting solutions: tracking transformations of drugs, health and the 'human' through human rights processes in Australia. Masculine enhancement as health or pathology: gender and optimisation discourses in health promotion materials on performance and image-enhancing drugs (PIEDs). The good pain patient: a critical evaluation of patients' self-presentations in specialist pain clinics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1