Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty Outcomes in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients with De Novo Small Coronary Vessels Disease.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/2632343
Botey Katamu Benjamin, Wenjie Lu, Zhanying Han, Liang Pan, Xi Wang, Xiaofei Qin, Guoju Sun, Xule Wang, Yingguang Shan, Ran Li, Xiaolin Zheng, Wencai Zhang, Qiangwei Shi, Shuai Zhou, Sen Guo, Peng Qin, Chhatra Pratap Singh, Jianzeng Dong, Chunguang Qiu
{"title":"Drug-Coated Balloon-Only Angioplasty Outcomes in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients with De Novo Small Coronary Vessels Disease.","authors":"Botey Katamu Benjamin,&nbsp;Wenjie Lu,&nbsp;Zhanying Han,&nbsp;Liang Pan,&nbsp;Xi Wang,&nbsp;Xiaofei Qin,&nbsp;Guoju Sun,&nbsp;Xule Wang,&nbsp;Yingguang Shan,&nbsp;Ran Li,&nbsp;Xiaolin Zheng,&nbsp;Wencai Zhang,&nbsp;Qiangwei Shi,&nbsp;Shuai Zhou,&nbsp;Sen Guo,&nbsp;Peng Qin,&nbsp;Chhatra Pratap Singh,&nbsp;Jianzeng Dong,&nbsp;Chunguang Qiu","doi":"10.1155/2021/2632343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The revascularization of small vessels using drug-eluting stents remains challenging. The use of the drug-coated balloon is an attractive therapeutic strategy in de novo lesions in small coronary vessels, particularly in the diabetic group. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of DCB-only angioplasty in small vessel disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 1198 patients with small vessel disease treated with DCB-only strategy were followed. Patients were divided into the diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Clinical and angiographical follow-up were organized at 12 months. The primary endpoints were target lesion failure and secondary major adverse cardiac events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significantly higher rate of target lesion failure among diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic [17 (3.9%) vs. 11 (1.4%), <i>P</i>=0.006], taken separately, the rate of target lesion revascularization significantly differed between groups with a higher rate observed in the diabetic group [9 (2%) vs. 4 (0.5%), <i>P</i>=0.014]. Diabetes mellitus remained an independent predictor for TLF (HR: 2.712, CI: 1.254-5.864, <i>P</i>=0.011) and target lesion revascularization (HR: 3.698, CI: 1.112-12.298, <i>P</i>=0.033) after adjustment. However, no significant differences were observed between groups regarding the target vessel myocardial infarction (0.6% vs. 0.1%, <i>P</i>=0.110) and MACE [19 (4.4%) vs. 21 (2.7%), <i>P</i>=0.120].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Drug-coated balloon-only treatment achieved lower incidence rates of TLF and MACE. Diabetes is an independent predictor for target lesion failure and target lesion revascularization at one year following DCB treatment in small coronary vessels. We observed no significant differences between groups regarding MACE in one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2021 ","pages":"2632343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654559/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2632343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The revascularization of small vessels using drug-eluting stents remains challenging. The use of the drug-coated balloon is an attractive therapeutic strategy in de novo lesions in small coronary vessels, particularly in the diabetic group. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of DCB-only angioplasty in small vessel disease.

Methods: A total of 1198 patients with small vessel disease treated with DCB-only strategy were followed. Patients were divided into the diabetic and nondiabetic groups. Clinical and angiographical follow-up were organized at 12 months. The primary endpoints were target lesion failure and secondary major adverse cardiac events.

Results: There was a significantly higher rate of target lesion failure among diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic [17 (3.9%) vs. 11 (1.4%), P=0.006], taken separately, the rate of target lesion revascularization significantly differed between groups with a higher rate observed in the diabetic group [9 (2%) vs. 4 (0.5%), P=0.014]. Diabetes mellitus remained an independent predictor for TLF (HR: 2.712, CI: 1.254-5.864, P=0.011) and target lesion revascularization (HR: 3.698, CI: 1.112-12.298, P=0.033) after adjustment. However, no significant differences were observed between groups regarding the target vessel myocardial infarction (0.6% vs. 0.1%, P=0.110) and MACE [19 (4.4%) vs. 21 (2.7%), P=0.120].

Conclusion: Drug-coated balloon-only treatment achieved lower incidence rates of TLF and MACE. Diabetes is an independent predictor for target lesion failure and target lesion revascularization at one year following DCB treatment in small coronary vessels. We observed no significant differences between groups regarding MACE in one year.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物包被球囊血管成形术治疗糖尿病和非糖尿病新生小冠状血管疾病的疗效
背景:小血管的血运重建使用药物洗脱支架仍然具有挑战性。使用药物包被球囊治疗小冠状血管新生病变是一种有吸引力的治疗策略,特别是在糖尿病组。本研究旨在评估仅dcb血管成形术治疗小血管疾病的结果。方法:对1198例接受dcb治疗的小血管疾病患者进行随访。将患者分为糖尿病组和非糖尿病组。12个月组织临床和血管造影随访。主要终点是靶病变失败和继发性主要心脏不良事件。结果:糖尿病患者靶病变失败率明显高于非糖尿病患者[17例(3.9%)比11例(1.4%),P=0.006],单独比较,两组间靶病变重建率差异显著,糖尿病组靶病变重建率较高[9例(2%)比4例(0.5%),P=0.014]。调整后,糖尿病仍然是TLF (HR: 2.712, CI: 1.254-5.864, P=0.011)和靶区血运重建(HR: 3.698, CI: 1.112-12.298, P=0.033)的独立预测因子。然而,在靶血管心肌梗死(0.6% vs. 0.1%, P=0.110)和MACE [19 (4.4%) vs. 21 (2.7%), P=0.120]方面,两组间无显著差异。结论:单纯药物包被球囊治疗TLF和MACE发生率较低。糖尿病是小冠状血管DCB治疗一年后靶病变失败和靶病变血运重建的独立预测因子。在一年内,我们观察到两组间MACE没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
A Comparative Analysis of Primary and Bailout ADR in CTO-PCI The Effect of Electromagnetic Interference Produced by Smartphones Using 5G Network on Patients With Permanent Pacemakers (EMS5G-PPM Study) Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes Vascular Complications and Bleeding After Transfemoral TAVR With Surgical Versus Percutaneous Approach: A Contemporary Prospective Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1