Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of transposable elements in polychaetous annelids highlight LTR retrotransposon diversity and evolution.

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Mobile DNA Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1186/s13100-021-00252-0
Jonathan Filée, Sarah Farhat, Dominique Higuet, Laure Teysset, Dominique Marie, Camille Thomas-Bulle, Stephane Hourdez, Didier Jollivet, Eric Bonnivard
{"title":"Comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses of transposable elements in polychaetous annelids highlight LTR retrotransposon diversity and evolution.","authors":"Jonathan Filée,&nbsp;Sarah Farhat,&nbsp;Dominique Higuet,&nbsp;Laure Teysset,&nbsp;Dominique Marie,&nbsp;Camille Thomas-Bulle,&nbsp;Stephane Hourdez,&nbsp;Didier Jollivet,&nbsp;Eric Bonnivard","doi":"10.1186/s13100-021-00252-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the expansion of high throughput sequencing, we now have access to a larger number of genome-wide studies analyzing the Transposable elements (TEs) composition in a wide variety of organisms. However, genomic analyses often remain too limited in number and diversity of species investigated to study in depth the dynamics and evolutionary success of the different types of TEs among metazoans. Therefore, we chose to investigate the use of transcriptomes to describe the diversity of TEs in phylogenetically related species by conducting the first comparative analysis of TEs in two groups of polychaetes and evaluate the diversity of TEs that might impact genomic evolution as a result of their mobility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We present a detailed analysis of TEs distribution in transcriptomes extracted from 15 polychaetes depending on the number of reads used during assembly, and also compare these results with additional TE scans on associated low-coverage genomes. We then characterized the clades defined by 1021 LTR-retrotransposon families identified in 26 species. Clade richness was highly dependent on the considered superfamily. Copia elements appear rare and are equally distributed in only three clades, GalEa, Hydra and CoMol. Among the eight BEL/Pao clades identified in annelids, two small clades within the Sailor lineage are new for science. We characterized 17 Gypsy clades of which only 4 are new; the C-clade largely dominates with a quarter of the families. Finally, all species also expressed for the majority two distinct transcripts encoding PIWI proteins, known to be involved in control of TEs mobilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that the use of transcriptomes assembled from 40 million reads was sufficient to access to the diversity and proportion of the transposable elements compared to those obtained by low coverage sequencing. Among LTR-retrotransposons Gypsy elements were unequivocally dominant but results suggest that the number of Gypsy clades, although high, may be more limited than previously thought in metazoans. For BEL/Pao elements, the organization of clades within the Sailor lineage appears more difficult to establish clearly. The Copia elements remain rare and result from the evolutionary consistent success of the same three clades.</p>","PeriodicalId":18854,"journal":{"name":"Mobile DNA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mobile DNA","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-021-00252-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the expansion of high throughput sequencing, we now have access to a larger number of genome-wide studies analyzing the Transposable elements (TEs) composition in a wide variety of organisms. However, genomic analyses often remain too limited in number and diversity of species investigated to study in depth the dynamics and evolutionary success of the different types of TEs among metazoans. Therefore, we chose to investigate the use of transcriptomes to describe the diversity of TEs in phylogenetically related species by conducting the first comparative analysis of TEs in two groups of polychaetes and evaluate the diversity of TEs that might impact genomic evolution as a result of their mobility.

Results: We present a detailed analysis of TEs distribution in transcriptomes extracted from 15 polychaetes depending on the number of reads used during assembly, and also compare these results with additional TE scans on associated low-coverage genomes. We then characterized the clades defined by 1021 LTR-retrotransposon families identified in 26 species. Clade richness was highly dependent on the considered superfamily. Copia elements appear rare and are equally distributed in only three clades, GalEa, Hydra and CoMol. Among the eight BEL/Pao clades identified in annelids, two small clades within the Sailor lineage are new for science. We characterized 17 Gypsy clades of which only 4 are new; the C-clade largely dominates with a quarter of the families. Finally, all species also expressed for the majority two distinct transcripts encoding PIWI proteins, known to be involved in control of TEs mobilities.

Conclusions: This study shows that the use of transcriptomes assembled from 40 million reads was sufficient to access to the diversity and proportion of the transposable elements compared to those obtained by low coverage sequencing. Among LTR-retrotransposons Gypsy elements were unequivocally dominant but results suggest that the number of Gypsy clades, although high, may be more limited than previously thought in metazoans. For BEL/Pao elements, the organization of clades within the Sailor lineage appears more difficult to establish clearly. The Copia elements remain rare and result from the evolutionary consistent success of the same three clades.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多毛环节动物转座因子的比较基因组学和转录组学分析突出了LTR反转录转座因子的多样性和进化。
背景:随着高通量测序的扩展,我们现在可以获得更多的全基因组研究,分析各种生物中的转座因子(te)组成。然而,基因组分析在研究物种的数量和多样性方面往往过于有限,无法深入研究后生动物中不同类型te的动态和进化成功。因此,我们选择利用转录组来描述系统发育相关物种的TEs多样性,通过对两组多毛动物的TEs进行首次比较分析,并评估te的多样性,这些多样性可能由于它们的移动性而影响基因组进化。结果:我们详细分析了从15种多毛动物中提取的转录组中根据组装过程中使用的读取数的TE分布,并将这些结果与相关低覆盖率基因组的额外TE扫描进行了比较。然后,我们对26个物种的1021个ltr -反转录转座子家族进行了分类。进化支丰富度高度依赖于所考虑的超科。在GalEa、Hydra和CoMol三个分支中,Copia元素的分布较为均匀。在环节动物中发现的八个BEL/Pao分支中,水手谱系中的两个小分支是科学上的新分支。我们鉴定了17个吉普赛分支,其中只有4个是新的;c支系占主导地位,占四分之一的家庭。最后,所有物种在大多数情况下也表达了两种不同的编码PIWI蛋白的转录本,已知这两种转录本参与了te迁移的控制。结论:本研究表明,与低覆盖率测序相比,使用从4000万reads组装的转录组足以获得转座因子的多样性和比例。在ltr -反转录转座子中,吉普赛元素明确占主导地位,但结果表明,吉普赛分支的数量虽然很高,但可能比以前认为的在后生动物中更为有限。对于BEL/Pao元素,水手血统中的分支组织似乎更难以确定。Copia元素仍然很少见,是同一三个进化支系在进化上一致成功的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mobile DNA
Mobile DNA GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
26
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Mobile DNA is an online, peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes articles providing novel insights into DNA rearrangements in all organisms, ranging from transposition and other types of recombination mechanisms to patterns and processes of mobile element and host genome evolution. In addition, the journal will consider articles on the utility of mobile genetic elements in biotechnological methods and protocols.
期刊最新文献
International congress on transposable elements (ICTE 2024) in Saint Malo: breaking down transposon waves and their impact. Accelerating de novo SINE annotation in plant and animal genomes. Association of hyperactivated transposon expression with exacerbated immune activation in systemic lupus erythematosus. Widespread HCD-tRNA derived SINEs in bivalves rely on multiple LINE partners and accumulate in genic regions. Correction: Transposon-derived introns as an element shaping the structure of eukaryotic genomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1