[Evaluation of a Risk Communication Program for Pesticide Residues].

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Hygiene and Safety Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.3358/shokueishi.62.187
Hiroshi Akiyama, Aya Takagi, Koichi Inoue, Yoshinari Suzuki, Rie Ito, Nobuyuki Wakui, Mayumi Asai, Junkichi Sugiura
{"title":"[Evaluation of a Risk Communication Program for Pesticide Residues].","authors":"Hiroshi Akiyama,&nbsp;Aya Takagi,&nbsp;Koichi Inoue,&nbsp;Yoshinari Suzuki,&nbsp;Rie Ito,&nbsp;Nobuyuki Wakui,&nbsp;Mayumi Asai,&nbsp;Junkichi Sugiura","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.62.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To promote and raise the awareness of accurate knowledge on pesticide residues, the symposium program on risk communication on pesticide residues was held by the broadcasted online style. The risk communication program was statistically evaluated using a pre- and post-program online questionnaire survey. We had the questionnaire answers of the 105 valid participants. The analysis of post-program questionnaires shows that the risk communication program was effective in terms of levels of understanding and interest. Pre-program risk perception or awareness of safety assessments was significantly and positively correlated with awareness for establishing standard values of pesticide residues by the analysis of pre-program questionnaires. Risk perception after the program was significantly higher than before the program, suggesting that risk perception increased due to the program by analysis the same question between pre- and post-program questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis suggests that the participants with higher pre-program awareness of safety assessments or pre-program awareness for establishing standard values appeared to have higher levels of understanding and post-program risk perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"62 6","pages":"187-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.62.187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To promote and raise the awareness of accurate knowledge on pesticide residues, the symposium program on risk communication on pesticide residues was held by the broadcasted online style. The risk communication program was statistically evaluated using a pre- and post-program online questionnaire survey. We had the questionnaire answers of the 105 valid participants. The analysis of post-program questionnaires shows that the risk communication program was effective in terms of levels of understanding and interest. Pre-program risk perception or awareness of safety assessments was significantly and positively correlated with awareness for establishing standard values of pesticide residues by the analysis of pre-program questionnaires. Risk perception after the program was significantly higher than before the program, suggesting that risk perception increased due to the program by analysis the same question between pre- and post-program questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis suggests that the participants with higher pre-program awareness of safety assessments or pre-program awareness for establishing standard values appeared to have higher levels of understanding and post-program risk perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[农药残留风险沟通项目的评估]。
为促进和提高准确认识农药残留的意识,以网络直播的方式举办了农药残留风险沟通研讨会。风险沟通计划采用计划前后在线问卷调查进行统计评估。得到105名有效被试的问卷答案。对项目后问卷的分析表明,风险沟通项目在理解水平和兴趣水平方面是有效的。通过对项目前问卷的分析,项目前风险感知或安全评价意识与农药残留标准值建立意识呈显著正相关。项目实施后的风险感知显著高于项目实施前,分析项目前后问卷同一题可知,项目实施后风险感知增加。多元回归分析表明,项目前安全评价意识和建立标准值意识越强的被试对项目后的风险认知和理解水平越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
[Analytical Method for Melengestrol Acetate in Livestock Products Using LC-MS/MS]. [Establishment of Rapid Simultaneous Analysis Method for Plant Toxins by LC-TOF-MS]. [Implementation and Evaluation of Risk Communication Regarding Residual Pesticides]. [Improved Indophenol Titration Method for Ascorbic Acid Using a Dropper and Electronic Balance: Enhanced Convenience and Efficiency]. [Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Processed Foods Containing Soybean or Maize].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1