Upholding Familism Among Asian American Youth: Measures of Familism Among Filipino and Korean American Youth

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Adolescent Research Review Pub Date : 2021-01-16 DOI:10.1007/s40894-020-00148-9
Yoonsun Choi, Tae Yeun Kim, Jeanette Park Lee, Kevin Poh Hiong Tan, Samuel Noh, David Takeuchi
{"title":"Upholding Familism Among Asian American Youth: Measures of Familism Among Filipino and Korean American Youth","authors":"Yoonsun Choi,&nbsp;Tae Yeun Kim,&nbsp;Jeanette Park Lee,&nbsp;Kevin Poh Hiong Tan,&nbsp;Samuel Noh,&nbsp;David Takeuchi","doi":"10.1007/s40894-020-00148-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although it is one of the core cultural values of Asian American families and an influential determinant of youth development, familism remains under-studied among Asian Americans and, despite crucial within-group heterogeneity, lacks subgroup specificity. This study describes the ways in which two major Asian American subgroups of youth, i.e., Filipino Americans and Korean Americans, maintain traditional familism. Specifically, this study constructed six self-report subscales of familism utilizing underused and new survey items and tested their psychometric properties. Using data collected from Filipino American (<i>n</i> = 150) and Korean American (<i>n</i> = 188) adolescents living in a Midwest metropolitan area, the measures were examined for validity and reliability for each group and, when appropriate, for measurement invariance across the groups. The main findings are that the finalized scales demonstrated solid reliability and validity (e.g., content and construct) in each group and some invariance and that core traditions, in the form of familism values and behaviors, persevere among second-generation Asian Americans, although familism was more evident among Filipino American youth than in Korean American youth. In both groups, subdomains of familism were not as discrete as found among their parents, who were predominantly foreign-born first-generation immigrants. The finalized familism scales were associated differently with several correlates including acculturation variables and youth outcomes. The findings are discussed with a call for further empirical research of diverse ethnic groups and immigrant generations to more accurately account for how family process interacts with cultural origin and acculturation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"6 4","pages":"437 - 455"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40894-020-00148-9","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-020-00148-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Although it is one of the core cultural values of Asian American families and an influential determinant of youth development, familism remains under-studied among Asian Americans and, despite crucial within-group heterogeneity, lacks subgroup specificity. This study describes the ways in which two major Asian American subgroups of youth, i.e., Filipino Americans and Korean Americans, maintain traditional familism. Specifically, this study constructed six self-report subscales of familism utilizing underused and new survey items and tested their psychometric properties. Using data collected from Filipino American (n = 150) and Korean American (n = 188) adolescents living in a Midwest metropolitan area, the measures were examined for validity and reliability for each group and, when appropriate, for measurement invariance across the groups. The main findings are that the finalized scales demonstrated solid reliability and validity (e.g., content and construct) in each group and some invariance and that core traditions, in the form of familism values and behaviors, persevere among second-generation Asian Americans, although familism was more evident among Filipino American youth than in Korean American youth. In both groups, subdomains of familism were not as discrete as found among their parents, who were predominantly foreign-born first-generation immigrants. The finalized familism scales were associated differently with several correlates including acculturation variables and youth outcomes. The findings are discussed with a call for further empirical research of diverse ethnic groups and immigrant generations to more accurately account for how family process interacts with cultural origin and acculturation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在亚裔美国青年中坚持家庭主义:菲律宾和韩裔美国青年的家庭主义衡量标准
尽管家庭主义是亚裔美国人家庭的核心文化价值观之一,也是青年发展的一个有影响力的决定因素,但它在亚裔美国人中的研究仍然不足,尽管在群体内具有重要的异质性,但缺乏亚组特异性。这项研究描述了两个主要的亚裔青年亚群,即菲律宾裔美国人和韩裔美国人,维持传统家庭主义的方式。具体而言,本研究利用未充分使用的和新的调查项目构建了六个家庭主义的自我报告分量表,并测试了它们的心理测量特性。使用从菲律宾裔美国人(n = 150)和韩裔美国人(n = 188)生活在中西部大都市地区的青少年,对每个群体的测量的有效性和可靠性进行了检查,并在适当的情况下对各群体的测量不变性进行了检查。主要发现是,最终确定的量表在每个群体中都表现出了坚实的可靠性和有效性(如内容和结构)以及一些不变性,并且以家庭主义价值观和行为为形式的核心传统在第二代亚裔美国人中持续存在,尽管家庭主义在菲律宾裔美国青年中比在韩裔美国青年更明显。在这两组人中,家庭主义的子域并不像他们的父母那样离散,他们的父母主要是外国出生的第一代移民。最终确定的家庭主义量表与几个相关因素有不同的关联,包括文化适应变量和青年结果。讨论这些发现时呼吁对不同种族群体和移民世代进行进一步的实证研究,以更准确地解释家庭过程如何与文化起源和文化适应相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
期刊最新文献
Adolescent Social Media Use and Emotional Intelligence: A Systematic Review LGBTQ+  Youth Identity Disclosure Processes: A Systematic Review A Systematic Review of the Facilitators and Barriers to Help-Seeking for Self-Harm in Young People: A Systems Thinking Perspective Key Components and Content of Effective Evidence-Based Digital Prevention Programs for Anxiety and Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Umbrella Review The Role of Organized Activities in Supporting Youth Social Capital Development: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1