Increased Speed Elicited More Automatized but Less Predictable Control in Cyclical Arm and Leg Movements.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Motor Control Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-12 DOI:10.1123/mc.2021-0047
Werner A F van de Ven, Jurjen Bosga, Wim Hullegie, Wiebe C Verra, Ruud G J Meulenbroek
{"title":"Increased Speed Elicited More Automatized but Less Predictable Control in Cyclical Arm and Leg Movements.","authors":"Werner A F van de Ven,&nbsp;Jurjen Bosga,&nbsp;Wim Hullegie,&nbsp;Wiebe C Verra,&nbsp;Ruud G J Meulenbroek","doi":"10.1123/mc.2021-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study explores variations in the degree of automaticity and predictability of cyclical arm and leg movements. Twenty healthy adults were asked to walk on a treadmill at a lower-than-preferred speed, their preferred speed, and at a higher-than-preferred speed. In a separate, repetitive punching task, the three walking frequencies were used to cue the target pace of the cyclical arm movements. Movements of the arms, legs, and trunk were digitized with inertial sensors. Whereas absolute slope values (|β|) of the linear fit to the power spectrum of the digitized movements (p < .001, η2 = .676) were systematically smaller in treadmill walking than in repetitive punching, sample entropy measures (p < .001, η2 = .570) were larger reflecting the former task being more automated but also less predictable than the latter task. In both tasks, increased speeds enhanced automatized control (p < .001, η2 = .475) but reduced movement predictability (p = .008, η2 = .225). The latter findings are potentially relevant when evaluating effects of task demand changes in clinical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49795,"journal":{"name":"Motor Control","volume":"26 1","pages":"15-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2021-0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The present study explores variations in the degree of automaticity and predictability of cyclical arm and leg movements. Twenty healthy adults were asked to walk on a treadmill at a lower-than-preferred speed, their preferred speed, and at a higher-than-preferred speed. In a separate, repetitive punching task, the three walking frequencies were used to cue the target pace of the cyclical arm movements. Movements of the arms, legs, and trunk were digitized with inertial sensors. Whereas absolute slope values (|β|) of the linear fit to the power spectrum of the digitized movements (p < .001, η2 = .676) were systematically smaller in treadmill walking than in repetitive punching, sample entropy measures (p < .001, η2 = .570) were larger reflecting the former task being more automated but also less predictable than the latter task. In both tasks, increased speeds enhanced automatized control (p < .001, η2 = .475) but reduced movement predictability (p = .008, η2 = .225). The latter findings are potentially relevant when evaluating effects of task demand changes in clinical contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加的速度引起更多的自动化,但更不可预测的控制在循环的手臂和腿的运动。
本研究探讨了周期性手臂和腿部运动的自动性和可预测性程度的变化。20名健康的成年人被要求在跑步机上以低于他们喜欢的速度、他们喜欢的速度和高于他们喜欢的速度行走。在一个单独的、重复的击打任务中,三种行走频率被用来提示周期性手臂运动的目标速度。手臂、腿和躯干的运动用惯性传感器进行了数字化。数字化运动的功率谱线性拟合的绝对斜率值(|β|)在跑步机上行走比重复打卡要小(p < .001, η2 = .676),而样本熵测量值(p < .001, η2 = .570)更大,反映了前者任务比后者任务更自动化,但也更不可预测。在这两项任务中,速度的提高增强了自动化控制(p < 0.001, η2 = .475),但降低了运动的可预测性(p = 0.008, η2 = .225)。后一项研究结果在评估任务需求变化对临床环境的影响时具有潜在的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Motor Control
Motor Control 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Motor Control (MC), a peer-reviewed journal, provides a multidisciplinary examination of human movement across the lifespan. To keep you abreast of current developments in the field of motor control, it offers timely coverage of important topics, including issues related to motor disorders. This international journal publishes many types of research papers, from clinical experimental to modeling and theoretical studies. These papers come from such varied disciplines as biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. Motor Control, the official journal of the International Society of Motor Control, is designed to provide a multidisciplinary forum for the exchange of scientific information on the control of human movement across the lifespan, including issues related to motor disorders. Motor Control encourages submission of papers from a variety of disciplines including, but not limited to, biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. This peer-reviewed journal publishes a wide variety of types of research papers including clinical experimental, modeling, and theoretical studies. To be considered for publication, papers should clearly demonstrate a contribution to the understanding of control of movement. In addition to publishing research papers, Motor Control publishes review articles, quick communications, commentaries, target articles, and book reviews. When warranted, an entire issue may be devoted to a specific topic within the area of motor control.
期刊最新文献
Toward an Operational Dynamical Model of Lateral Manual Interception Behavior. The Effect of Cognitive and Motor Dual Tasks on the Synergy of Lower Limb Muscles During Walking. Attentional Focus Strategies Can Improve Performance of Postural Control in Runners. Effect of a Perturbation-Based Balance Training Session on Adaptive Locomotor Response in Older Adults With a History of Falls. Postmovement Beta Rebound in Real and Imagined Movement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1