From Socialism to Social Media: Women's and Gender History in Post-Soviet Russia**

IF 0.6 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1002/bewi.202100008
Ella Rossman
{"title":"From Socialism to Social Media: Women's and Gender History in Post-Soviet Russia**","authors":"Ella Rossman","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202100008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Women's and gender history in Russia has been developing since the 1990s and began to be institutionalized in the 2000s and 2010s. Throughout that period, unfavorable intra-academic and sociopolitical conditions hindered the development of women's and gender history in Russia. Those who tried to establish a new field of study under these conditions sought various strategies by which to legitimize their research and build up authority among peers. This article analyzes their strategies for legitimizing women's and gender history in the Russian academy and beyond, using Bourdieu's work in the scientific field. I argue that in the 2000s, at the stage of institutionalization, researchers in the field of women's and gender history tried to legitimize their field by applying a number of strategies. These included appeals to scale, geography, and a connection with the generalized “West,” as well as attempts to ascertain the practical significance of women's and gender history and, finally, highlight their connections to the classical heritage of the humanities and social sciences. Despite arguing with an explicitly feminist gist in mind, researchers of this generation had little to do with activism and were comparatively less active in the media than before. In the 2010s, however, as the development of new media and a new wave of feminism in Russia significantly changed the strategies for legitimizing the field, researchers started coming to women's and gender history by way of feminist activism. Lacking prospects within the academy, young researchers turned to social media and journalism to establish their authority through popularity with the general public.</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bewi.202100008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Women's and gender history in Russia has been developing since the 1990s and began to be institutionalized in the 2000s and 2010s. Throughout that period, unfavorable intra-academic and sociopolitical conditions hindered the development of women's and gender history in Russia. Those who tried to establish a new field of study under these conditions sought various strategies by which to legitimize their research and build up authority among peers. This article analyzes their strategies for legitimizing women's and gender history in the Russian academy and beyond, using Bourdieu's work in the scientific field. I argue that in the 2000s, at the stage of institutionalization, researchers in the field of women's and gender history tried to legitimize their field by applying a number of strategies. These included appeals to scale, geography, and a connection with the generalized “West,” as well as attempts to ascertain the practical significance of women's and gender history and, finally, highlight their connections to the classical heritage of the humanities and social sciences. Despite arguing with an explicitly feminist gist in mind, researchers of this generation had little to do with activism and were comparatively less active in the media than before. In the 2010s, however, as the development of new media and a new wave of feminism in Russia significantly changed the strategies for legitimizing the field, researchers started coming to women's and gender history by way of feminist activism. Lacking prospects within the academy, young researchers turned to social media and journalism to establish their authority through popularity with the general public.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社会主义到社交媒体:后苏联时期俄罗斯的女性和性别史**
自20世纪90年代以来,俄罗斯的妇女和性别史一直在发展,并在2000年代和2010年代开始制度化。在这一时期,不利的学术内部和社会政治条件阻碍了俄罗斯妇女和性别史的发展。那些试图在这种情况下建立一个新的研究领域的人寻求各种策略,以使他们的研究合法化,并在同行中建立权威。本文利用布迪厄在科学领域的工作,分析了他们在俄罗斯学术界及其他领域使妇女和性别史合法化的策略。我认为,在2000年代,在制度化阶段,女性和性别史领域的研究人员试图通过应用一系列策略来使他们的领域合法化。其中包括对规模、地理和与广义“西方”的联系的呼吁,以及试图确定女性和性别历史的实际意义,最后,强调它们与人文和社会科学经典遗产的联系。尽管这一代的研究人员以明确的女权主义为主旨进行辩论,但他们与激进主义几乎没有什么关系,在媒体上的活跃程度也相对较低。然而,在2010年代,随着新媒体的发展和俄罗斯女权主义的新浪潮显著改变了该领域合法化的策略,研究人员开始通过女权主义行动主义来研究女性和性别历史。由于在学术界缺乏前景,年轻的研究人员转向社交媒体和新闻,通过在公众中的知名度来建立自己的权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Geschichte der Wissenschaften ist in erster Linie eine Geschichte der Ideen und Entdeckungen, oft genug aber auch der Moden, Irrtümer und Missverständnisse. Sie hängt eng mit der Entwicklung kultureller und zivilisatorischer Leistungen zusammen und bleibt von der politischen Geschichte keineswegs unberührt.
期刊最新文献
Inhaltsverzeichnis: Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 3/2024 Titelbild: (Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 3/2024) Science in Community: Anatomy, Academy, and Argument in the Eighteenth-Century Holy Roman Empire** „History is touchy“ Die History-of-Programming-Languages-Konferenz, 1978 Descartes on Place and Motion: A Reading through Cartesian Commentaries**
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1