Delivery at Catholic hospitals and postpartum contraception use, five US states, 2015-2018.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-13 DOI:10.1363/psrh.12186
Michelle C Menegay, Rebecca Andridge, Katherine Rivlin, Maria F Gallo
{"title":"Delivery at Catholic hospitals and postpartum contraception use, five US states, 2015-2018.","authors":"Michelle C Menegay,&nbsp;Rebecca Andridge,&nbsp;Katherine Rivlin,&nbsp;Maria F Gallo","doi":"10.1363/psrh.12186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate whether the prevalence of postpartum contraceptive use was lower among people who delivered at a Catholic hospital compared to a non-Catholic hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked 2015-2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey data from five states to hospital information from the corresponding birth certificate file. People with a live birth self-reported their use of contraception methods on the PRAMS survey at 2-6 months postpartum, which we coded into two dichotomous (yes vs. no) outcomes for use of female sterilization and highly-effective contraception (female/male sterilization, intrauterine device, implant, injectable, oral contraception, patch, or ring). We conducted multilevel log-binomial regression to examine the relationship between birth hospital type and postpartum contraception use adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of female sterilization for people who delivered at a Catholic hospital was 51% lower than that of their counterparts delivering at a non-Catholic hospital (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found lower use of postpartum female sterilization, but no difference in highly effective contraception overall, for people who delivered at a Catholic hospital compared to a non-Catholic hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":" ","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/29/PSRH-54-5.PMC9305525.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether the prevalence of postpartum contraceptive use was lower among people who delivered at a Catholic hospital compared to a non-Catholic hospital.

Methods: We linked 2015-2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey data from five states to hospital information from the corresponding birth certificate file. People with a live birth self-reported their use of contraception methods on the PRAMS survey at 2-6 months postpartum, which we coded into two dichotomous (yes vs. no) outcomes for use of female sterilization and highly-effective contraception (female/male sterilization, intrauterine device, implant, injectable, oral contraception, patch, or ring). We conducted multilevel log-binomial regression to examine the relationship between birth hospital type and postpartum contraception use adjusting for confounders.

Results: Prevalence of female sterilization for people who delivered at a Catholic hospital was 51% lower than that of their counterparts delivering at a non-Catholic hospital (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.65).

Conclusion: We found lower use of postpartum female sterilization, but no difference in highly effective contraception overall, for people who delivered at a Catholic hospital compared to a non-Catholic hospital.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2015-2018年,美国五个州天主教医院的分娩和产后避孕措施的使用。
目的:评价在天主教医院分娩的孕妇是否比在非天主教医院分娩的孕妇使用产后避孕药具的比例更低。方法:我们将来自5个州的2015-2018年妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)调查数据与相应出生证明文件中的医院信息联系起来。活产的人在产后2-6个月的PRAMS调查中自我报告了他们使用避孕方法的情况,我们将使用女性绝育和高效避孕(女性/男性绝育、宫内节育器、植入物、注射、口服避孕、贴片或环)的结果分为两类(是或否)。我们进行了多水平对数二项回归来检验出生医院类型与产后避孕使用之间的关系,调整了混杂因素。结果:在天主教医院分娩的女性绝育率比在非天主教医院分娩的女性低51%(调整患病率:0.49;95%置信区间:0.37-0.65)。结论:我们发现在天主教医院分娩的妇女与在非天主教医院分娩的妇女相比,产后女性绝育的使用率较低,但总体上在高效避孕方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Electronic Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of electronic materials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials science, engineering, optics, physics, and chemistry into important applications of electronic materials. Sample research topics that span the journal's scope are inorganic, organic, ionic and polymeric materials with properties that include conducting, semiconducting, superconducting, insulating, dielectric, magnetic, optoelectronic, piezoelectric, ferroelectric and thermoelectric. Indexed/​Abstracted: Web of Science SCIE Scopus CAS INSPEC Portico
期刊最新文献
Issue Publication Information Issue Editorial Masthead Exciton Emission in Monolayer Tungsten Disulfide under Synergistic Strain and Electric Field Oxygen Vacancies Enabled MOF-Derived Tb–SnO2 Compound for a High-Response, Low Detection Limit, and Humidity-Tolerant Chemiresistive Gas Sensor of Formaldehyde Room Temperature Epitaxy of Wafer-Scale Copper Films with High Electronic and Optical Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1