Effects of parenting education programs for refugee and migrant parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q3 Medicine Child Health Nursing Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-28 DOI:10.4094/chnr.2022.28.1.23
In-Sook Lee, Eunjung Kim
{"title":"Effects of parenting education programs for refugee and migrant parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"In-Sook Lee,&nbsp;Eunjung Kim","doi":"10.4094/chnr.2022.28.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of parenting education programs (PEPs) for refugee and migrant parents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies published from 2000 to 2020 were identified through a systematic search of six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, RISS, KMBASE). A meta-analysis of the studies was then undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 14,996 published works identified, 23 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 19 studies were analyzed to estimate the effect sizes (standardized mean differences) of the PEPs using random-effect models. PEPs were effective for parenting efficacy (effect size [ES]=1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.66), positive parenting behaviors (ES=0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.73), parent-child relationships (ES=0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.53), and parenting stress (ES=0.64; 95% CI: 0.50-0.79). There were statistically significant differences in the effect sizes of PEPs that included mothers only (ES=0.93), included children under 7 years of age(ES=0.91), did not include child participation (0.77), continued for 19 or more sessions (ES=0.80), and were analyzed in quasi-experimental studies (ES=0.86). The overall effect of publication bias was robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEPs were found to be effective at improving parenting efficacy, positive parenting behaviors, parent-child relationships, and parenting stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":37360,"journal":{"name":"Child Health Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/3b/chnr-28-1-23.PMC8858783.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Health Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2022.28.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of parenting education programs (PEPs) for refugee and migrant parents.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies published from 2000 to 2020 were identified through a systematic search of six electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, RISS, KMBASE). A meta-analysis of the studies was then undertaken.

Results: Of the 14,996 published works identified, 23 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, and 19 studies were analyzed to estimate the effect sizes (standardized mean differences) of the PEPs using random-effect models. PEPs were effective for parenting efficacy (effect size [ES]=1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.66), positive parenting behaviors (ES=0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.73), parent-child relationships (ES=0.38; 95% CI: 0.22-0.53), and parenting stress (ES=0.64; 95% CI: 0.50-0.79). There were statistically significant differences in the effect sizes of PEPs that included mothers only (ES=0.93), included children under 7 years of age(ES=0.91), did not include child participation (0.77), continued for 19 or more sessions (ES=0.80), and were analyzed in quasi-experimental studies (ES=0.86). The overall effect of publication bias was robust.

Conclusion: PEPs were found to be effective at improving parenting efficacy, positive parenting behaviors, parent-child relationships, and parenting stress.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对难民和移民父母的育儿教育计划的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统回顾和荟萃分析调查了父母教育计划(pep)对难民和移民父母的影响。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价。通过对6个电子数据库(PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, RISS, KMBASE)的系统检索,确定了2000年至2020年发表的相关研究。然后对这些研究进行了荟萃分析。结果:在14,996篇已发表的文献中,有23篇研究符合纳入标准,并对19篇研究进行分析,使用随机效应模型估计pep的效应量(标准化平均差异)。pep对育儿效能有效(效应量[ES]=1.40;95%可信区间[CI]: 1.14-1.66),积极的父母教养行为(ES=0.51;95% CI: 0.30-0.73),亲子关系(ES=0.38;95% CI: 0.22-0.53)和父母压力(ES=0.64;95% ci: 0.50-0.79)。仅包括母亲(ES=0.93)、包括7岁以下儿童(ES=0.91)、不包括儿童参与(0.77)、持续19次或更长时间(ES=0.80)以及在准实验研究中进行分析(ES=0.86)的pep的效应量差异具有统计学意义。发表偏倚的总体影响是稳健的。结论:亲子行为干预对改善亲子效能、改善正向亲子行为、改善亲子关系、改善亲子压力有显著作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Child Health Nursing Research
Child Health Nursing Research Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of nursing students' reflection levels before and after debriefing in simulation training in South Korea: qualitative analysis design. Evaluation of a child abuse prevention program for unmarried mothers in South Korea: a single-case experimental design. Incidence of falls and fall-related characteristics in hospitalized children in South Korea: a descriptive study. South Korean first-time mothers' knowledge of digestive health problems in infancy and their utilization of health care facilities for digestive health concerns: a descriptive study. What makes a good reviewer?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1