{"title":"Impact of direct restorative dental materials on surface root caries treatment. Evidence based and current materials development: A systematic review","authors":"Watcharapong Tonprasong , Masanao Inokoshi , Makoto Shimizubata , Mao Yamamoto , Keita Hatano , Shunsuke Minakuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic review provides an update on the development and efficacy of direct restorative dental materials for root caries interventions from in vitro and clinical studies. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using specific MeSH keywords. Full articles from September 1990 to October 2021 were collected. Additional articles were identified by reference retrieval and manual searching. Studies not related to restorative materials for root caries treatment, case reports, non-original articles, and/or articles not written in English were excluded. Bias risk assessment was performed for the clinical studies. Forty-two articles (eleven clinical studies and thirty-one in vitro studies) were included for analysis. Most in vitro studies indicated an excellent cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations also presented reduced recurrent caries activity but had a lower efficacy than glass ionomer cement restorations. For composite resin restorations, the main material development strategies are to strengthen the tooth structure and integrate antimicrobial activity. The clinical studies offered limited data, so the most appropriate material for surface root caries treatment is still inconclusive. However, atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) is an alternative treatment for patients with limiting conditions. Further clinical studies are required to confirm the efficacy of bioactive materials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51334,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Dental Science Review","volume":"58 ","pages":"Pages 13-30"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/2d/main.PMC8724859.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Dental Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761621000429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This systematic review provides an update on the development and efficacy of direct restorative dental materials for root caries interventions from in vitro and clinical studies. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using specific MeSH keywords. Full articles from September 1990 to October 2021 were collected. Additional articles were identified by reference retrieval and manual searching. Studies not related to restorative materials for root caries treatment, case reports, non-original articles, and/or articles not written in English were excluded. Bias risk assessment was performed for the clinical studies. Forty-two articles (eleven clinical studies and thirty-one in vitro studies) were included for analysis. Most in vitro studies indicated an excellent cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement. Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations also presented reduced recurrent caries activity but had a lower efficacy than glass ionomer cement restorations. For composite resin restorations, the main material development strategies are to strengthen the tooth structure and integrate antimicrobial activity. The clinical studies offered limited data, so the most appropriate material for surface root caries treatment is still inconclusive. However, atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) is an alternative treatment for patients with limiting conditions. Further clinical studies are required to confirm the efficacy of bioactive materials.
这篇系统综述从体外和临床研究中提供了用于牙根龋干预的直接修复牙材料的发展和疗效的最新进展。使用特定的MeSH关键词搜索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science。收集1990年9月至2021年10月的文章全文。通过参考文献检索和人工检索确定其他文章。与牙根龋治疗的修复材料无关的研究、病例报告、非原创文章和/或非英文文章被排除在外。对临床研究进行偏倚风险评估。纳入42篇文章(11篇临床研究和31篇体外研究)进行分析。大多数体外研究表明,玻璃离子水门汀具有良好的固牙效果。树脂改性玻璃离聚体修复体也表现出减少复发性龋齿活动,但其疗效低于玻璃离聚体水泥修复体。对于复合树脂修复体,主要的材料发展策略是加强牙齿结构和整合抗菌活性。临床研究提供的数据有限,因此治疗牙根表面龋最合适的材料仍然没有定论。然而,非创伤性修复治疗(ART)是局限性患者的一种替代治疗方法。需要进一步的临床研究来证实生物活性物质的功效。
期刊介绍:
The Japanese Dental Science Review is published by the Japanese Association for Dental Science aiming to introduce the modern aspects of the dental basic and clinical sciences in Japan, and to share and discuss the update information with foreign researchers and dentists for further development of dentistry. In principle, papers are written and submitted on the invitation of one of the Editors, although the Editors would be glad to receive suggestions. Proposals for review articles should be sent by the authors to one of the Editors by e-mail. All submitted papers are subject to the peer- refereeing process.