Consensus statement on safety measures for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy.

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2021-11-02 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2021-0125
Arnaud Girardot-Miglierina, Daniel Clerc, Mohammad Alyami, Laurent Villeneuve, Olivia Sgarbura, Marc-André Reymond, Martin Hübner
{"title":"Consensus statement on safety measures for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy.","authors":"Arnaud Girardot-Miglierina,&nbsp;Daniel Clerc,&nbsp;Mohammad Alyami,&nbsp;Laurent Villeneuve,&nbsp;Olivia Sgarbura,&nbsp;Marc-André Reymond,&nbsp;Martin Hübner","doi":"10.1515/pp-2021-0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising treatment for peritoneal cancer that entails, however, potential risks for the caregivers in the operating room (OR). This study aimed to reach a consensus within the PIPAC community on a comprehensive safety protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Active PIPAC centers were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi process on 43 predefined items: concise summaries of the existing evidence were presented together with questions formulated using the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, the strength of recommendation was voted by panelists, accepting a consensus threshold of ≥50% of the agreement for any of the four grading options, or ≥70% in either direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven out of 66 invited panelists answered both rounds (response rate 76%). The consensus was reached for 41 out of 43 items (95.3%). Strong and weak recommendations were issued for 30 and 10 items, respectively. A positive consensual recommendation was issued to activate laminar airflow without specific strength, neither strong nor weak. No consensus was reached for systematic glove change for caregivers with a high risk of exposure and filtering facepiece mask class 3 for caregivers with low risk of exposure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high degree of consensus was reached for a comprehensive safety protocol for PIPAC, adapted to the risk of exposure for the different caregivers in the OR. This consensus can serve as a basis for education and help reach a high degree of adherence in daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"6 4","pages":"139-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719448/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2021-0125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objectives: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising treatment for peritoneal cancer that entails, however, potential risks for the caregivers in the operating room (OR). This study aimed to reach a consensus within the PIPAC community on a comprehensive safety protocol.

Methods: Active PIPAC centers were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi process on 43 predefined items: concise summaries of the existing evidence were presented together with questions formulated using the population, intervention, comparator, and outcome framework. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, the strength of recommendation was voted by panelists, accepting a consensus threshold of ≥50% of the agreement for any of the four grading options, or ≥70% in either direction.

Results: Forty-seven out of 66 invited panelists answered both rounds (response rate 76%). The consensus was reached for 41 out of 43 items (95.3%). Strong and weak recommendations were issued for 30 and 10 items, respectively. A positive consensual recommendation was issued to activate laminar airflow without specific strength, neither strong nor weak. No consensus was reached for systematic glove change for caregivers with a high risk of exposure and filtering facepiece mask class 3 for caregivers with low risk of exposure.

Conclusions: A high degree of consensus was reached for a comprehensive safety protocol for PIPAC, adapted to the risk of exposure for the different caregivers in the OR. This consensus can serve as a basis for education and help reach a high degree of adherence in daily practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于加压腹腔喷雾化疗安全措施的共识声明。
目的:加压腹膜内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)是一种很有前景的腹膜癌治疗方法,但对手术室(OR)的护理人员有潜在的风险。本研究的目的是在PIPAC社区内就一个全面的安全协议达成共识。方法:邀请活跃的PIPAC中心参与针对43个预定义项目的两轮德尔菲过程:对现有证据进行简要总结,并使用人口、干预、比较物和结果框架制定问题。根据建议评估、发展和评价的分级,由小组成员投票决定推荐的强度,接受四种分级选项中任何一种≥50%的共识阈值,或任何一种≥70%的共识阈值。结果:66位受邀小组成员中有47位回答了两轮问题(回复率76%)。在43个问题中,有41个(95.3%)达成了一致意见。分别就30个和10个项目提出了强烈建议和弱建议。一项积极的共识建议发布,以激活层流气流没有特定的强度,既不强也不弱。对于暴露风险高的护理人员系统地更换手套,对于低暴露风险的护理人员系统地更换3级过滤面罩,尚未达成共识。结论:对于PIPAC的综合安全方案达成了高度共识,该方案适应了手术室中不同护理人员的暴露风险。这种共识可以作为教育的基础,并有助于在日常实践中达到高度的坚持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Combined Nabpaclitaxel pressurized intraPeritoneal aerosol chemotherapy with systemic Nabpaclitaxel-Gemcitabine chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer peritoneal metastases: protocol of single-arm, open-label, phase II trial (Nab-PIPAC trial). Thromboelastogram changes are associated with postoperative complications after cytoreductive surgery. Impact of laparoscopic ultrasound during PIPAC directed treatment of unresectable peritoneal metastasis. In vitro 3D microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model for testing different oxaliplatin-based HIPEC regimens. Ascites does not accompany pleural effusion developing under dasatinib therapy in patients with CML-CP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1