Development and validation of a headspace GC-MS method to evaluate the interconversion of impurities and the product quality of liquid hand sanitizers.

AAPS Open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-17 DOI:10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8
Nicolas Abrigo, Connie Ruzicka, Patrick Faustino, Neil Stiber, Agnes NguyenPho, Thomas O'Connor, Diaa Shakleya
{"title":"Development and validation of a headspace GC-MS method to evaluate the interconversion of impurities and the product quality of liquid hand sanitizers.","authors":"Nicolas Abrigo, Connie Ruzicka, Patrick Faustino, Neil Stiber, Agnes NguyenPho, Thomas O'Connor, Diaa Shakleya","doi":"10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased usage of hand sanitizer products by the public to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and decrease the likelihood of acquiring the disease. The increase in demand has also led to an increase in the number of manufacturers. This work describes the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) laboratories efforts to develop tests to assess the quality of hand sanitizer products containing ethanol or isopropanol as the primary active ingredient. The products were evaluated for the active ingredient content and determination of the 12 impurities listed in the FDA Hand Sanitizer Temporary Guidance, followed by a spike recovery assay performed to verify the test results. Extensive method development was conducted including an investigation into the stability of ethanol, isopropanol, and the 12 impurities. Stability and kinetic studies confirmed the instability of acetal in acidic liquid hand sanitizer products during spike recovery assay testing. The headspace GC-MS method was validated according to ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines and the spike recovery assay was validated using three concentrations of standards for the drug product. During method application, six liquid hand sanitizer products were tested and all were determined to have ethanol or isopropanol above 70% v/v. Two liquid hand sanitizer products were determined to contain acetaldehyde as an impurity above the FDA recommended safety levels.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":453,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8762429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Open","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to increased usage of hand sanitizer products by the public to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and decrease the likelihood of acquiring the disease. The increase in demand has also led to an increase in the number of manufacturers. This work describes the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) laboratories efforts to develop tests to assess the quality of hand sanitizer products containing ethanol or isopropanol as the primary active ingredient. The products were evaluated for the active ingredient content and determination of the 12 impurities listed in the FDA Hand Sanitizer Temporary Guidance, followed by a spike recovery assay performed to verify the test results. Extensive method development was conducted including an investigation into the stability of ethanol, isopropanol, and the 12 impurities. Stability and kinetic studies confirmed the instability of acetal in acidic liquid hand sanitizer products during spike recovery assay testing. The headspace GC-MS method was validated according to ICH Q2 (R1) guidelines and the spike recovery assay was validated using three concentrations of standards for the drug product. During method application, six liquid hand sanitizer products were tested and all were determined to have ethanol or isopropanol above 70% v/v. Two liquid hand sanitizer products were determined to contain acetaldehyde as an impurity above the FDA recommended safety levels.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发和验证顶空气相色谱-质谱法,以评估液体洗手液中杂质的相互转化和产品质量。
COVID-19 的流行导致公众更多地使用洗手液产品,以防止 COVID-19 的传播并降低感染该疾病的可能性。需求的增加也导致了生产商数量的增加。这项工作介绍了 FDA 药物评价与研究中心 (CDER) 实验室为开发用于评估以乙醇或异丙醇为主要活性成分的洗手液产品质量的测试所做的努力。对产品的有效成分含量进行了评估,并对 FDA 手部消毒剂临时指南中列出的 12 种杂质进行了测定,随后进行了尖峰回收测定以验证测试结果。进行了广泛的方法开发,包括调查乙醇、异丙醇和 12 种杂质的稳定性。稳定性和动力学研究证实,在尖峰回收测定测试中,酸性洗手液产品中的乙缩醛不稳定。根据 ICH Q2 (R1) 指南对顶空 GC-MS 方法进行了验证,并使用药物产品的三种浓度标准品对尖峰回收测定进行了验证。在方法应用过程中,对六种洗手液产品进行了检测,所有产品的乙醇或异丙醇含量都超过了 70% v/v。经检测,两种洗手液产品中的乙醛杂质含量超过了美国食品及药物管理局建议的安全水平:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1186/s41120-021-00049-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An in-silico approach towards multivariate acceptable ranges in biopharmaceutical manufacturing Recent progress of small-molecule of RET inhibitors against Non-small cell lung cancer Falsified and problematic methandienone products available online: active pharmaceutical ingredient identification by portable Raman spectrometers and quantification by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–Fourier transform mass spectrometry Effect of chemical penetration enhancers on the transdermal delivery of olanzapine in human skin in vitro Dissolution profile evaluation of selected brands of amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium 625 mg tablets retailed in Hawassa town, Sidama Regional State, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1