The development of an indel panel for microchimerism detection

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104804
Sofie D.H. Olsen , Astrid M. Kolte , Nina Bang , Maria Christine Krog , Rudi Steffensen , Henriette S. Nielsen , Marianne A. Jakobsen
{"title":"The development of an indel panel for microchimerism detection","authors":"Sofie D.H. Olsen ,&nbsp;Astrid M. Kolte ,&nbsp;Nina Bang ,&nbsp;Maria Christine Krog ,&nbsp;Rudi Steffensen ,&nbsp;Henriette S. Nielsen ,&nbsp;Marianne A. Jakobsen","doi":"10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim of the study was to create a simple assay for microchimerism detection independent of sex and without HLA genotyping.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>The method is based on detection of insertion or deletions utilizing a multiplex PCR followed by fragment analysis by </span>capillary electrophoresis, and probe-based qPCR assays. A total of 192 samples, taken either before pregnancy, during 1st trimester, or either during </span>2nd trimester<span><span> or at miscarriage, obtained from a cohort of 97 female patients with either primary or secondary recurrent pregnancy loss, were screened for fetal microchimerism by the </span>indel panel as well as an existing assay based on detection of the Y-chromosome marker; DYS14.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The overall prevalence of DYS14 positive samples was 29% (55/192) whereas 32% (61/192) tested positive by the indel method. There was an overall agreement of 64% (122/192) between the results obtained by the two methods. A Fisher's Exact test showed no statistic significant difference in the prevalence of microchimerism detected by the two methods at any of the three times of sampling. The distribution of the number of positive wells detected by both methods were compared by a Mann-Whitney </span><em>U</em> test, which showed no statistically significant difference at any of the three times of sampling.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The data indicates that microchimerism can be detected efficiently by the indel method. This makes it possible to detect both female and male cells without the need of HLA-genotyping. Furthermore, the indel method has potential to be implemented as a routine analysis. This will remove the sex bias in future explorations of the role microchimerism plays in health and disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014480022000673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the study was to create a simple assay for microchimerism detection independent of sex and without HLA genotyping.

Methods

The method is based on detection of insertion or deletions utilizing a multiplex PCR followed by fragment analysis by capillary electrophoresis, and probe-based qPCR assays. A total of 192 samples, taken either before pregnancy, during 1st trimester, or either during 2nd trimester or at miscarriage, obtained from a cohort of 97 female patients with either primary or secondary recurrent pregnancy loss, were screened for fetal microchimerism by the indel panel as well as an existing assay based on detection of the Y-chromosome marker; DYS14.

Results

The overall prevalence of DYS14 positive samples was 29% (55/192) whereas 32% (61/192) tested positive by the indel method. There was an overall agreement of 64% (122/192) between the results obtained by the two methods. A Fisher's Exact test showed no statistic significant difference in the prevalence of microchimerism detected by the two methods at any of the three times of sampling. The distribution of the number of positive wells detected by both methods were compared by a Mann-Whitney U test, which showed no statistically significant difference at any of the three times of sampling.

Conclusion

The data indicates that microchimerism can be detected efficiently by the indel method. This makes it possible to detect both female and male cells without the need of HLA-genotyping. Furthermore, the indel method has potential to be implemented as a routine analysis. This will remove the sex bias in future explorations of the role microchimerism plays in health and disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微嵌合检测用indel面板的研制
目的建立一种无需HLA基因分型,且与性别无关的微嵌合检测方法。方法采用多重PCR检测插入或缺失,然后进行毛细管电泳片段分析和探针qPCR分析。从97例原发或继发复发性妊娠丢失的女性患者中抽取的妊娠前、妊娠早期、妊娠中期或流产时共192个样本,通过indel panel和现有的基于y染色体标记检测的检测方法筛选胎儿微嵌合;DYS14。结果DYS14总阳性率为29%(55/192),而indel法检测阳性率为32%(61/192)。两种方法的结果一致度为64%(122/192)。Fisher精确检验显示,在三次抽样中,两种方法检测到的微嵌合的发生率没有统计学上的显著差异。通过Mann-Whitney U检验比较了两种方法检测到的阳性井的数量分布,在三次采样中,任何一次都没有统计学上的显著差异。结论indel方法可以有效地检测微嵌合现象。这使得不需要hla基因分型就可以检测女性和男性细胞。此外,indel方法有可能被实现为常规分析。这将消除未来探索微嵌合在健康和疾病中所起作用的性别偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1