Prediction of geoid undulation using approaches based on GMDH, M5 model tree, MARS, GPR, and IDP

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Pub Date : 2022-04-30 DOI:10.1007/s40328-022-00378-4
Berkant Konakoglu, Alper Akar
{"title":"Prediction of geoid undulation using approaches based on GMDH, M5 model tree, MARS, GPR, and IDP","authors":"Berkant Konakoglu,&nbsp;Alper Akar","doi":"10.1007/s40328-022-00378-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study provides a comprehensive comparison of four different machine learning models including the group method of data handling (GMDH), M5 model tree (M5MT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) for predicting geoid undulation. For the first time, GMDH and M5MT were applied for this purpose. The obtained results were also compared with the classic inverse distance to a power (IDP) interpolation method. In order to assess the consistency of our results, two test sites with different topographic features were used for the evaluation of the models. In constructing the models, the geographic coordinate values and the geoid undulation value were used as inputs and output, respectively. Several statistical indices and rank analysis were used for evaluation of the models. According to the comparative results of all models in both test sites, the GMDH yielded the best performance among the developed models. The M5MT also exhibited acceptable results. Thus, it may be concluded that the proposed GMDH and M5MT have the potential to be alternative models that could assist geoscientists working with the geoid.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":"57 2","pages":"293 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40328-022-00378-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive comparison of four different machine learning models including the group method of data handling (GMDH), M5 model tree (M5MT), multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), and Gaussian process regression (GPR) for predicting geoid undulation. For the first time, GMDH and M5MT were applied for this purpose. The obtained results were also compared with the classic inverse distance to a power (IDP) interpolation method. In order to assess the consistency of our results, two test sites with different topographic features were used for the evaluation of the models. In constructing the models, the geographic coordinate values and the geoid undulation value were used as inputs and output, respectively. Several statistical indices and rank analysis were used for evaluation of the models. According to the comparative results of all models in both test sites, the GMDH yielded the best performance among the developed models. The M5MT also exhibited acceptable results. Thus, it may be concluded that the proposed GMDH and M5MT have the potential to be alternative models that could assist geoscientists working with the geoid.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于GMDH、M5模型树、MARS、GPR和IDP方法的大地水准面波动预测
本研究全面比较了四种不同的机器学习模型,包括数据处理组方法(GMDH)、M5模型树(M5MT)、多变量自适应回归样条(MARS)和高斯过程回归(GPR)预测大地面线波动。首次将GMDH和M5MT用于此目的。并将所得结果与经典的IDP插值方法进行了比较。为了评估我们的结果的一致性,我们使用了两个具有不同地形特征的试验点来评估模型。在构建模型时,分别以地理坐标值和大地水准面起伏值作为输入和输出。采用几种统计指标和等级分析对模型进行评价。根据两个试验场各模型的对比结果,GMDH在已开发的模型中性能最好。M5MT也显示出可接受的结果。因此,可以得出结论,建议的GMDH和M5MT有可能成为可以帮助地球科学家研究大地水准面的替代模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Planning, emphasis and proposal for implementation of gravimetric control network in Israel Selection of a calibration system for relative gravimeters and testing of the processing using the example of the Zhetygen calibration baseline in Kazakhstan A forwarding spoofing detection algorithm for Beidou navigation satellite system vulnerability Machine learning assisted model based petrographic classification: a case study from Bokaro coal field Spatial and temporal analysis of daily terrestrial water storage anomalies in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1