Induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Abstract

Background and objective: Induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy are the most two effective treatments for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study was to compare the efficacy of induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.

Methods: From August 2002 to April 2005, 408 patients were randomly divided into the induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC/CCRT) group and the induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy (IC/RT) group. Patients in both groups received the same induction chemotherapy, including two cycles of floxuridine (FuDR) plus carboplatin (FuDR750 mg/m2, d1-5; carboplatin AUC=6). All the patients underwent radiotherapy one week after completing the induction chemotherapy. The patients in the IC/CCRT group also received carboplatin (AUC=6) on day 7, 28, and 49 during radiotherapy. Eight patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. The remaining 400 cases were analyzed.

Results: Grade III/IV toxicity was found in 28.4% of the patients in the IC/CCRT group and 13.1% in the IC/RT group (P < 0.001). After a median follow up time of 3.9 years, the three-year overall survival was 75.9% and 83.4% (P = 0.12) in the IC/CCRT and IC/RT groups, respectively. No significant differences in the failure-free survival rate, the locoregional control rate, and the distant control rate were found between the two groups.

Conclusion: The IC/CCRT program does not improve the overall survival rate in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC compared with the IC/RT program.