Brachial artery reactivity in patients with severe sepsis: an observational study.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2012-12-12 DOI:10.1186/cc11223
Orren Wexler, Mary A M Morgan, Michael S Gough, Sherry D Steinmetz, Cynthia M Mack, Denise C Darling, Kathleen P Doolin, Michael J Apostolakos, Brian T Graves, Mark W Frampton, Xucai Chen, Anthony P Pietropaoli
{"title":"Brachial artery reactivity in patients with severe sepsis: an observational study.","authors":"Orren Wexler,&nbsp;Mary A M Morgan,&nbsp;Michael S Gough,&nbsp;Sherry D Steinmetz,&nbsp;Cynthia M Mack,&nbsp;Denise C Darling,&nbsp;Kathleen P Doolin,&nbsp;Michael J Apostolakos,&nbsp;Brian T Graves,&nbsp;Mark W Frampton,&nbsp;Xucai Chen,&nbsp;Anthony P Pietropaoli","doi":"10.1186/cc11223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound measurements of brachial artery reactivity in response to stagnant ischemia provide estimates of microvascular function and conduit artery endothelial function. We hypothesized that brachial artery reactivity would independently predict severe sepsis and severe sepsis mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a combined case-control and prospective cohort study. We measured brachial artery reactivity in 95 severe sepsis patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units of an academic medical center and in 52 control subjects without acute illness. Measurements were compared in severe sepsis patients versus control subjects and in severe sepsis survivors versus nonsurvivors. Multivariable analyses were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hyperemic velocity (centimeters per cardiac cycle) and flow-mediated dilation (percentage) were significantly lower in severe sepsis patients versus control subjects (hyperemic velocity: severe sepsis = 34 (25 to 48) versus controls = 63 (52 to 81), P < 0.001; flow-mediated dilation: severe sepsis = 2.65 (0.81 to 4.79) versus controls = 4.11 (3.06 to 6.78), P < 0.001; values expressed as median (interquartile range)). Hyperemic velocity, but not flow-mediated dilation, was significantly lower in hospital nonsurvivors versus survivors (hyperemic velocity: nonsurvivors = 25 (16 to 28) versus survivors = 39 (30 to 50), P < 0.001; flow-mediated dilation: nonsurvivors = 1.90 (0.68 to 3.41) versus survivors = 2.96 (0.91 to 4.86), P = 0.12). Lower hyperemic velocity was independently associated with hospital mortality in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11 (95% confidence interval = 1.04 to 1.19) per 1 cm/cardiac cycle decrease in hyperemic velocity; P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Brachial artery hyperemic blood velocity is a noninvasive index of microvascular function that independently predicts mortality in severe sepsis. In contrast, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, reflecting conduit artery endothelial function, was not associated with mortality in our severe sepsis cohort. Brachial artery hyperemic velocity may be a useful measurement to identify patients who could benefit from novel therapies designed to reverse microvascular dysfunction in severe sepsis and to assess the physiologic efficacy of these treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"R38"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/cc11223","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound measurements of brachial artery reactivity in response to stagnant ischemia provide estimates of microvascular function and conduit artery endothelial function. We hypothesized that brachial artery reactivity would independently predict severe sepsis and severe sepsis mortality.

Methods: This was a combined case-control and prospective cohort study. We measured brachial artery reactivity in 95 severe sepsis patients admitted to the medical and surgical intensive care units of an academic medical center and in 52 control subjects without acute illness. Measurements were compared in severe sepsis patients versus control subjects and in severe sepsis survivors versus nonsurvivors. Multivariable analyses were also conducted.

Results: Hyperemic velocity (centimeters per cardiac cycle) and flow-mediated dilation (percentage) were significantly lower in severe sepsis patients versus control subjects (hyperemic velocity: severe sepsis = 34 (25 to 48) versus controls = 63 (52 to 81), P < 0.001; flow-mediated dilation: severe sepsis = 2.65 (0.81 to 4.79) versus controls = 4.11 (3.06 to 6.78), P < 0.001; values expressed as median (interquartile range)). Hyperemic velocity, but not flow-mediated dilation, was significantly lower in hospital nonsurvivors versus survivors (hyperemic velocity: nonsurvivors = 25 (16 to 28) versus survivors = 39 (30 to 50), P < 0.001; flow-mediated dilation: nonsurvivors = 1.90 (0.68 to 3.41) versus survivors = 2.96 (0.91 to 4.86), P = 0.12). Lower hyperemic velocity was independently associated with hospital mortality in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11 (95% confidence interval = 1.04 to 1.19) per 1 cm/cardiac cycle decrease in hyperemic velocity; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Brachial artery hyperemic blood velocity is a noninvasive index of microvascular function that independently predicts mortality in severe sepsis. In contrast, brachial artery flow-mediated dilation, reflecting conduit artery endothelial function, was not associated with mortality in our severe sepsis cohort. Brachial artery hyperemic velocity may be a useful measurement to identify patients who could benefit from novel therapies designed to reverse microvascular dysfunction in severe sepsis and to assess the physiologic efficacy of these treatments.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重脓毒症患者的肱动脉反应性:一项观察性研究。
简介:在停滞缺血状态下,超声测量肱动脉反应性可以评估微血管功能和导管动脉内皮功能。我们假设肱动脉反应性可以独立预测严重脓毒症和严重脓毒症死亡率。方法:这是一项病例对照和前瞻性队列研究。我们测量了一家学术医疗中心内科和外科重症监护病房收治的95名严重脓毒症患者和52名无急性疾病的对照受试者的肱动脉反应性。对严重脓毒症患者与对照组、严重脓毒症幸存者与非幸存者的测量结果进行比较。并进行了多变量分析。结果:与对照组相比,严重脓毒症患者的充血速度(厘米/心周期)和血流介导的扩张(百分比)显著降低(充血速度:严重脓毒症= 34(25 ~ 48),对照组= 63 (52 ~ 81),P < 0.001;血流介导扩张:严重脓毒症= 2.65(0.81 ~ 4.79),对照组= 4.11 (3.06 ~ 6.78),P < 0.001;值以中位数表示(四分位数范围))。医院非幸存者的充血速度,而非血流介导的扩张,显著低于幸存者(充血速度:非幸存者= 25 (16 ~ 28)vs幸存者= 39 (30 ~ 50),P < 0.001;血流介导的舒张:非幸存者= 1.90 (0.68 ~ 3.41)vs幸存者= 2.96 (0.91 ~ 4.86),P = 0.12)。在多变量分析中,较低的充血速度与医院死亡率独立相关(优势比= 1.11(95%可信区间= 1.04至1.19),充血速度每1厘米/心周期降低;P = 0.003)。结论:肱动脉充血速度是一种无创的微血管功能指标,可独立预测严重脓毒症患者的死亡率。相反,反映导管动脉内皮功能的肱动脉血流介导的扩张与我们的严重脓毒症队列中的死亡率无关。肱动脉充血速度可能是一种有用的测量方法,可以识别那些可以从旨在逆转严重败血症微血管功能障碍的新疗法中获益的患者,并评估这些治疗的生理疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Differential carbon dioxide in awake peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a neglected clinical challenge. Attenuated hemodynamic response to adjunct vasopressin in obese septic shock patients: a physiological or dose-dependent effect? In-hospital testing of NIVPredict - an AI tool for early prediction of non-invasive ventilation outcome in acute respiratory failure. Centralization of post-resuscitation care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at cardiac arrest centres: a Danish nationwide follow-up study. Optimal time window for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1