Misuse of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire as a case-finding measure and a critique of the concept of using a screening scale for bipolar disorder in psychiatric practice

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Bipolar Disorders Pub Date : 2012-03-15 DOI:10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00994.x
Mark Zimmerman
{"title":"Misuse of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire as a case-finding measure and a critique of the concept of using a screening scale for bipolar disorder in psychiatric practice","authors":"Mark Zimmerman","doi":"10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00994.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zimmerman M. Misuse of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire as a case-finding measure and a critique of the concept of using a screening scale for bipolar disorder in psychiatric practice. Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 127–134. © 2012 The Author. Journal compilation © 2012 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S.</p><p><b>Objectives: </b> Under-recognition of bipolar disorder (BD) is common and incurs significant costs for individuals and society. Clinicians are often encouraged to use screening instruments to help them identify patients with the disorder. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is the most widely studied measure for this purpose. Some studies, however, have used the MDQ as a case-finding instrument rather than a screening scale. Such inappropriate use of screening scales risks distorting perceptions about many facets of BD, from its prevalence to its consequences.</p><p><b>Methods: </b> Studies using the MDQ were reviewed to identify those reports that have used the scale as a case-finding measure rather than a screening scale.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Multiple studies were identified in the BD literature that used the MDQ as a diagnostic proxy. The findings of these studies were misinterpreted because of the failure to make the distinction between screening and case-finding.</p><p><b>Conclusions: </b> Inappropriate conclusions have been drawn regarding the prevalence, morbidity, and diagnostic under-recognition of BD in studies that rely on the MDQ as a diagnostic proxy. A conceptual critique is offered against the use of self-administered screening questionnaires for the detection of BD in psychiatric settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8959,"journal":{"name":"Bipolar Disorders","volume":"14 2","pages":"127-134"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00994.x","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bipolar Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00994.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Zimmerman M. Misuse of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire as a case-finding measure and a critique of the concept of using a screening scale for bipolar disorder in psychiatric practice. Bipolar Disord 2012: 14: 127–134. © 2012 The Author. Journal compilation © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Objectives: Under-recognition of bipolar disorder (BD) is common and incurs significant costs for individuals and society. Clinicians are often encouraged to use screening instruments to help them identify patients with the disorder. The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is the most widely studied measure for this purpose. Some studies, however, have used the MDQ as a case-finding instrument rather than a screening scale. Such inappropriate use of screening scales risks distorting perceptions about many facets of BD, from its prevalence to its consequences.

Methods: Studies using the MDQ were reviewed to identify those reports that have used the scale as a case-finding measure rather than a screening scale.

Results: Multiple studies were identified in the BD literature that used the MDQ as a diagnostic proxy. The findings of these studies were misinterpreted because of the failure to make the distinction between screening and case-finding.

Conclusions: Inappropriate conclusions have been drawn regarding the prevalence, morbidity, and diagnostic under-recognition of BD in studies that rely on the MDQ as a diagnostic proxy. A conceptual critique is offered against the use of self-administered screening questionnaires for the detection of BD in psychiatric settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滥用情绪障碍问卷作为一种病例发现的措施,并批评在精神病学实践中使用双相情感障碍筛查量表的概念。
滥用情绪障碍问卷作为一种病例发现措施和对精神病学实践中使用双相情感障碍筛查量表概念的批评。躁郁症,2012,14:127-134。©2012作者。期刊编辑©2012 John Wiley &儿子/ S。目的:双相情感障碍(BD)的认知不足是很常见的,并且给个人和社会带来了巨大的代价。临床医生经常被鼓励使用筛查工具来帮助他们识别患有这种疾病的患者。情绪障碍问卷(MDQ)是为此目的研究最广泛的测量方法。然而,一些研究使用MDQ作为病例发现工具,而不是筛查量表。这种筛查量表的不当使用可能会扭曲人们对双相障碍的许多方面的认识,从患病率到后果。方法:对使用MDQ的研究进行回顾,以确定那些使用量表作为病例发现措施而不是筛查量表的报告。结果:在双相障碍文献中,有多项研究将MDQ作为诊断指标。由于未能区分筛查和病例发现,这些研究的结果被误解了。结论:在依赖MDQ作为诊断指标的研究中,关于双相障碍的患病率、发病率和诊断认识不足得出了不恰当的结论。一个概念上的批评是针对使用自我管理的筛选问卷,以检测双相障碍在精神病学设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bipolar Disorders is an international journal that publishes all research of relevance for the basic mechanisms, clinical aspects, or treatment of bipolar disorders and related illnesses. It intends to provide a single international outlet for new research in this area and covers research in the following areas: biochemistry physiology neuropsychopharmacology neuroanatomy neuropathology genetics brain imaging epidemiology phenomenology clinical aspects and therapeutics of bipolar disorders Bipolar Disorders also contains papers that form the development of new therapeutic strategies for these disorders as well as papers on the topics of schizoaffective disorders, and depressive disorders as these can be cyclic disorders with areas of overlap with bipolar disorders. The journal will consider for publication submissions within the domain of: Perspectives, Research Articles, Correspondence, Clinical Corner, and Reflections. Within these there are a number of types of articles: invited editorials, debates, review articles, original articles, commentaries, letters to the editors, clinical conundrums, clinical curiosities, clinical care, and musings.
期刊最新文献
Potential Impact of Childhood Abuse on Quality of Life During Mood-Stabilising Treatment in Individuals Living With Bipolar Disorder. A High-Accuracy and Easy-Use Differential Diagnosis Method of Bipolar Disorder Depressive Phase and Major Depressive Disorder Using a Wearable Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Understanding the Current State of Play of Early Intervention for Bipolar Disorder: Qualitative Analysis of Consultations With International Stakeholders. A Significant Decline of Glomerular Filtration Rate in the Majority of Long-Term Lithium Users: Results of a Dutch Prospective 10-Year Cohort Study. Antidepressant-Associated Risk of Manic and Mixed Episode Hospitalization in Bipolar I Disorder: A 10-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1