[Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Strategies in special situations].

Hans Volkmann, M Walter, C Walter, S Vetter
{"title":"[Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Strategies in special situations].","authors":"Hans Volkmann,&nbsp;M Walter,&nbsp;C Walter,&nbsp;S Vetter","doi":"10.1007/s11789-011-0022-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morbidity and mortality associated with atrial fibrillation are mainly related to thromboembolic complications, particularly ischemic strokes. The prevention of thromboembolism is an important component of the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. The choice of optimum antithrombotic therapy for a given patient depends on the risk of thromboembolism, on the one hand, and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, on the other hand. Concerning the benefit-to-risk stratification, the problem lies in the similar and sometimes even identical risk factors for both thromboembolism and hemorrhage.At present, oral vitamin K antagonists are recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate or high risk of ischemic stroke. The thromboembolic risk should be assessed using validated stratification schemes, such as the CHADS(2) score for basic orientation and the CHA(2)DS(2)VASc score for extended risk stratification. Aspirin alone is recommended for patients at low risk of thromboembolic complications. Problems in antithrombotic therapy of atrial fibrillation arise treating those patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation, those with contraindication for vitamin K antagonists, or those with persisting left atrial thrombus requiring electrical cardioversion. The optimum therapeutic management of these special patients has not yet been defined by proper studies, leaving only empirically based recommendations for their treatment.Hopefully the development of new antithrombotic agents, that are easier to use and have a superior benefit-to-risk ratio, will extend effective prevention of thromboembolic events to a greater part of the atrial fibrillation population at risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":39208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","volume":"6 ","pages":"58-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11789-011-0022-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-011-0022-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Morbidity and mortality associated with atrial fibrillation are mainly related to thromboembolic complications, particularly ischemic strokes. The prevention of thromboembolism is an important component of the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. The choice of optimum antithrombotic therapy for a given patient depends on the risk of thromboembolism, on the one hand, and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, on the other hand. Concerning the benefit-to-risk stratification, the problem lies in the similar and sometimes even identical risk factors for both thromboembolism and hemorrhage.At present, oral vitamin K antagonists are recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate or high risk of ischemic stroke. The thromboembolic risk should be assessed using validated stratification schemes, such as the CHADS(2) score for basic orientation and the CHA(2)DS(2)VASc score for extended risk stratification. Aspirin alone is recommended for patients at low risk of thromboembolic complications. Problems in antithrombotic therapy of atrial fibrillation arise treating those patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stent implantation, those with contraindication for vitamin K antagonists, or those with persisting left atrial thrombus requiring electrical cardioversion. The optimum therapeutic management of these special patients has not yet been defined by proper studies, leaving only empirically based recommendations for their treatment.Hopefully the development of new antithrombotic agents, that are easier to use and have a superior benefit-to-risk ratio, will extend effective prevention of thromboembolic events to a greater part of the atrial fibrillation population at risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
房颤抗凝治疗。特殊情况下的策略]。
心房颤动的发病率和死亡率主要与血栓栓塞并发症有关,特别是缺血性中风。预防血栓栓塞是房颤患者治疗的重要组成部分。对特定患者选择最佳抗血栓治疗一方面取决于血栓栓塞的风险,另一方面取决于脑出血的风险。关于获益-风险分层,问题在于血栓栓塞和出血的危险因素相似,有时甚至相同。目前,口服维生素K拮抗剂推荐给中度或高危缺血性卒中房颤患者。应使用有效的分层方案评估血栓栓塞风险,如CHADS(2)评分用于基本定向,CHA(2)DS(2)VASc评分用于扩展风险分层。对于血栓栓塞并发症风险低的患者,建议单独使用阿司匹林。房颤的抗血栓治疗问题出现在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和支架植入术的患者,有维生素K拮抗剂禁忌症的患者,或有持续左心房血栓需要电转复的患者。这些特殊患者的最佳治疗管理尚未由适当的研究确定,仅留下基于经验的治疗建议。希望新的抗血栓药物的开发,更容易使用,具有优越的利益-风险比,将有效预防血栓栓塞事件扩大到更多的心房颤动高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels. Is lipoprotein(a) a risk factor for ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism? Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship. Lipoprotein(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a)-an interdisciplinary challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1