[Exclusion of coronary artery disease using cardiac CT. What impact do CT results have on patient management?].

Clemens Themba Kadalie, Reinhardt Sternitzky
{"title":"[Exclusion of coronary artery disease using cardiac CT. What impact do CT results have on patient management?].","authors":"Clemens Themba Kadalie,&nbsp;Reinhardt Sternitzky","doi":"10.1007/s11789-011-0030-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid advancement of multidetector head computed tomography (MDCT) during the past 10 years has facilitated noninvasive evaluation of CAD (coronary artery disease). Since the introduction of 320-row technology, examination of the whole heart in a single heart beat with diagnostic quality has become feasible. Direct imaging of vessel morphology, a high sensitivity for CAD above 96%, and low requirements of patient compliance represent advantages over other imaging modalities, such as MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), scintigraphy, and echocardiography. In some cases radiation exposure can be reduced to an effective dose below 1 mSV.Current data suggest that cardiac CT represents a more effective diagnostic tool than treadmill testing in order to decide whether cardiac catheterization is indicated. Treadmill testing has been an integral procedure of cardiac examinations for decades, although sensitivity for detecting CAD is as low as 70%.Cardiac CT represents a rather new modality and is almost exclusively performed in diagnostic imaging centers. Innovative concepts in the evaluation of CAD including CT are expected. Some authors propose cardiac CT as a major diagnostic tool for the exclusion of CAD. MRI, scintigraphy, or echocardiography in combination with a stress test remain important procedures in order to evaluate the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis. Treadmill testing prior to cardiac CT has become questionable.The future role of cardiac CT in CAD in \"change of management\" concepts is promising. In order to optimize decisions of patient management on the basis of a cardiac CT examinations, awareness of current data is mandatory for the referring clinician and the performing radiological department.</p>","PeriodicalId":39208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","volume":"6 ","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11789-011-0030-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-011-0030-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rapid advancement of multidetector head computed tomography (MDCT) during the past 10 years has facilitated noninvasive evaluation of CAD (coronary artery disease). Since the introduction of 320-row technology, examination of the whole heart in a single heart beat with diagnostic quality has become feasible. Direct imaging of vessel morphology, a high sensitivity for CAD above 96%, and low requirements of patient compliance represent advantages over other imaging modalities, such as MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), scintigraphy, and echocardiography. In some cases radiation exposure can be reduced to an effective dose below 1 mSV.Current data suggest that cardiac CT represents a more effective diagnostic tool than treadmill testing in order to decide whether cardiac catheterization is indicated. Treadmill testing has been an integral procedure of cardiac examinations for decades, although sensitivity for detecting CAD is as low as 70%.Cardiac CT represents a rather new modality and is almost exclusively performed in diagnostic imaging centers. Innovative concepts in the evaluation of CAD including CT are expected. Some authors propose cardiac CT as a major diagnostic tool for the exclusion of CAD. MRI, scintigraphy, or echocardiography in combination with a stress test remain important procedures in order to evaluate the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis. Treadmill testing prior to cardiac CT has become questionable.The future role of cardiac CT in CAD in "change of management" concepts is promising. In order to optimize decisions of patient management on the basis of a cardiac CT examinations, awareness of current data is mandatory for the referring clinician and the performing radiological department.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏CT排除冠状动脉疾病。CT结果对患者管理有什么影响?
在过去的十年中,多探头头部计算机断层扫描(MDCT)的快速发展促进了冠心病(冠状动脉疾病)的无创评估。自320排技术引进以来,在单次心脏跳动中对整个心脏进行具有诊断质量的检查已成为可能。血管形态学的直接成像,对CAD的高灵敏度超过96%,以及对患者依从性的低要求比其他成像方式(如MRI(磁共振成像),闪烁成像和超声心动图)具有优势。在某些情况下,辐射照射可减少到1毫西沃特以下的有效剂量。目前的数据表明,为了确定是否需要心导管插入术,心脏CT是一种比跑步机测试更有效的诊断工具。几十年来,跑步机检测一直是心脏检查的一个重要步骤,尽管检测CAD的灵敏度低至70%。心脏CT代表了一种相当新的模式,几乎只在诊断成像中心进行。期望在包括CT在内的CAD评估中有创新的概念。一些作者建议心脏CT作为排除CAD的主要诊断工具。MRI、显像或超声心动图结合压力测试仍然是评估冠状动脉狭窄血流动力学相关性的重要手段。在心脏CT之前进行跑步机测试是值得怀疑的。心脏CT在CAD“管理观念的转变”中的作用是有希望的。为了在心脏CT检查的基础上优化患者管理决策,转诊临床医生和执行放射科必须了解当前数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels. Is lipoprotein(a) a risk factor for ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism? Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship. Lipoprotein(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a)-an interdisciplinary challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1