Reduction in the Treatment Gap for Breast Cancer in Mexico under Seguro Popular, 2007 to 2016.

Karla Unger-Saldaña, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Héctor Lamadrid-Figueroa, Alejandro Mohar, Erick Suazo-Zepeda, Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez, Martin Lajous, Michael R Reich
{"title":"Reduction in the Treatment Gap for Breast Cancer in Mexico under <i>Seguro Popular</i>, 2007 to 2016.","authors":"Karla Unger-Saldaña,&nbsp;Alejandra Contreras-Manzano,&nbsp;Héctor Lamadrid-Figueroa,&nbsp;Alejandro Mohar,&nbsp;Erick Suazo-Zepeda,&nbsp;Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez,&nbsp;Martin Lajous,&nbsp;Michael R Reich","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2022.2064794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As Mexico's government restructures the health system, a comprehensive assessment of <i>Seguro Popular's</i> Fund for Protection against Catastrophic Expenses (FPGC) can help inform decision makers to improve breast cancer outcomes and health system performance. This study aimed to estimate the treatment gap for breast cancer patients treated under FPGC and assess changes in this gap between 2007 (when coverage started for breast cancer treatment) and 2016. We used a nationwide administrative claims database for patients whose breast cancer treatment was financed by FPGC in this period (56,847 women), Global Burden of Disease breast cancer incidence estimates, and other databases to estimate the population not covered by social security. We compared the observed number of patients who received treatment under FPGC to the expected number of breast cancer cases among women not covered by social security to estimate the treatment gap. Nationwide, the treatment gap was reduced by more than half: from 0.71, 95% CI (0.69, 0.73) in 2007 to 0.15, 95%CI (0.09, 0.22) in 2016. Reductions were observed across all states . This is the first study to assess the treatment gap for breast cancer patients covered under <i>Seguro Popular</i>. Expanded financing through FPGC sharply increased access to treatment for breast cancer. This was an important step toward improving breast cancer care, but high mortality remains a problem in Mexico. Increased access to treatment needs to be coupled with effective interventions to assure earlier cancer diagnosis and earlier initiation of high-quality treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":73218,"journal":{"name":"Health systems and reform","volume":" ","pages":"e2064794"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health systems and reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2022.2064794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

As Mexico's government restructures the health system, a comprehensive assessment of Seguro Popular's Fund for Protection against Catastrophic Expenses (FPGC) can help inform decision makers to improve breast cancer outcomes and health system performance. This study aimed to estimate the treatment gap for breast cancer patients treated under FPGC and assess changes in this gap between 2007 (when coverage started for breast cancer treatment) and 2016. We used a nationwide administrative claims database for patients whose breast cancer treatment was financed by FPGC in this period (56,847 women), Global Burden of Disease breast cancer incidence estimates, and other databases to estimate the population not covered by social security. We compared the observed number of patients who received treatment under FPGC to the expected number of breast cancer cases among women not covered by social security to estimate the treatment gap. Nationwide, the treatment gap was reduced by more than half: from 0.71, 95% CI (0.69, 0.73) in 2007 to 0.15, 95%CI (0.09, 0.22) in 2016. Reductions were observed across all states . This is the first study to assess the treatment gap for breast cancer patients covered under Seguro Popular. Expanded financing through FPGC sharply increased access to treatment for breast cancer. This was an important step toward improving breast cancer care, but high mortality remains a problem in Mexico. Increased access to treatment needs to be coupled with effective interventions to assure earlier cancer diagnosis and earlier initiation of high-quality treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2007年至2016年Seguro Popular下墨西哥乳腺癌治疗差距的缩小
随着墨西哥政府对卫生系统进行重组,对Seguro Popular的灾难性费用保护基金(FPGC)进行全面评估可以帮助决策者改善乳腺癌预后和卫生系统绩效。本研究旨在估计FPGC治疗下乳腺癌患者的治疗差距,并评估2007年(乳腺癌治疗开始覆盖时)至2016年这一差距的变化。我们使用了一个全国范围内由FPGC资助乳腺癌治疗的患者的行政索赔数据库(56,847名妇女),全球疾病负担乳腺癌发病率估计,以及其他数据库来估计未被社会保障覆盖的人口。我们将观察到的在FPGC下接受治疗的患者数量与未被社会保障覆盖的女性中乳腺癌病例的预期数量进行比较,以估计治疗差距。在全国范围内,治疗差距缩小了一半以上:从2007年的0.71 95%CI(0.69, 0.73)到2016年的0.15 95%CI(0.09, 0.22)。在所有州都观察到减少。这是第一个评估Seguro Popular覆盖的乳腺癌患者治疗差距的研究。通过FPGC扩大的资金大大增加了乳腺癌治疗的可及性。这是朝着改善乳腺癌护理迈出的重要一步,但高死亡率仍然是墨西哥的一个问题。增加获得治疗的机会需要与有效的干预措施相结合,以确保早期诊断癌症和早期开始高质量治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Public Financial Management Save Life? Evidence from a Quantitative Review of PFM and Health Outcomes in Sub-Saharan African Countries. COVID-19 Deaths in Long-Term Care Facilities in the US: An Urgent Call for Equitable and Integrated Health Systems and an All-Hazards Approach to the Next Crisis. Resilience of Primary Health Care in Ukraine: Challenges of the Pandemic and War. The Impact of Centralized Procurement on Treatment Patterns for Myocardial Infarction and More Principled Utilization of Coronary Stents. Data Integration of Health Financing Systems as a Critical Enabler for Objective-Oriented Health System Reform: A Scoping Review from India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1