Systematic review of the diagnostic performance of serum markers of liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease.

Julie Parkes, Indra Neil Guha, Scott Harris, William Mc Rosenberg, Paul J Roderick
{"title":"Systematic review of the diagnostic performance of serum markers of liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease.","authors":"Julie Parkes,&nbsp;Indra Neil Guha,&nbsp;Scott Harris,&nbsp;William Mc Rosenberg,&nbsp;Paul J Roderick","doi":"10.1186/1476-5926-11-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a significant cause of death and morbidity. Detection of liver fibrosis at an early stage could provide opportunities for more optimal management. Serum markers of liver fibrosis offer an alternative to biopsy. Evidence of the performance of biomarkers in ALD is needed and a systematic review to evaluate available studies was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they evaluated paired samples of biopsy and serum, and presented data as sensitivity, specificity, or ROC curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies were included- median participant number = 146 (range 44-1034). Studies differed with respect to patient populations. 6 single markers were evaluated (mostly Hyaluronic Acid), and ten combined panels. Biomarkers could discriminate between people with severe fibrosis/cirrhosis with high diagnostic accuracy- HA (median AUROC 0.79 range 0.69-0.93), panels (median AUROC 0.83 range 0.38-0.95). Significant heterogeneity precluded pooling. Performance was poorer for detecting less severe fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are limited numbers of small studies evaluating the accuracy of biomarkers in identifying fibrosis on biopsy in ALD. Some showed promise (both HA alone and some panels) in the identification of cirrhosis/severe fibrosis and could be used to rule it out in heavy drinkers. Biomarkers less accurate with less severe fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":84474,"journal":{"name":"Comparative hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1476-5926-11-5","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-11-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Background: Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a significant cause of death and morbidity. Detection of liver fibrosis at an early stage could provide opportunities for more optimal management. Serum markers of liver fibrosis offer an alternative to biopsy. Evidence of the performance of biomarkers in ALD is needed and a systematic review to evaluate available studies was conducted.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched. Studies were included if they evaluated paired samples of biopsy and serum, and presented data as sensitivity, specificity, or ROC curves.

Results: 15 studies were included- median participant number = 146 (range 44-1034). Studies differed with respect to patient populations. 6 single markers were evaluated (mostly Hyaluronic Acid), and ten combined panels. Biomarkers could discriminate between people with severe fibrosis/cirrhosis with high diagnostic accuracy- HA (median AUROC 0.79 range 0.69-0.93), panels (median AUROC 0.83 range 0.38-0.95). Significant heterogeneity precluded pooling. Performance was poorer for detecting less severe fibrosis.

Conclusions: There are limited numbers of small studies evaluating the accuracy of biomarkers in identifying fibrosis on biopsy in ALD. Some showed promise (both HA alone and some panels) in the identification of cirrhosis/severe fibrosis and could be used to rule it out in heavy drinkers. Biomarkers less accurate with less severe fibrosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精性肝病肝纤维化血清标志物诊断性能的系统综述
背景:酒精性肝病(ALD)是导致死亡和发病的重要原因。早期发现肝纤维化可以为更优化的治疗提供机会。肝纤维化的血清标志物提供了活检的另一种选择。需要生物标志物在ALD中的表现证据,并进行了系统评价以评估现有研究。方法:检索电子数据库。如果研究评估了成对的活检和血清样本,并以敏感性、特异性或ROC曲线的形式提供数据,则纳入研究。结果:纳入15项研究,中位受试者人数= 146(范围44-1034)。研究在患者群体方面存在差异。评估了6个单一标记(主要是透明质酸)和10个组合标记。生物标志物可以区分具有高诊断准确性的严重纤维化/肝硬化患者- HA(中位AUROC 0.79范围0.69-0.93),panel(中位AUROC 0.83范围0.38-0.95)。显著的异质性排除了合并的可能性。在检测不太严重的纤维化时,表现较差。结论:评估生物标志物在ALD活检中识别纤维化准确性的小型研究数量有限。一些显示出希望(单独的HA和一些小组)在肝硬化/严重纤维化的识别和可用于排除酗酒者。生物标志物准确性较低,纤维化程度较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of the diagnostic performance of serum markers of liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease. N-acetylcysteine improves antitumoural response of Interferon alpha by NF-kB downregulation in liver cancer cells. The genetic regulation of the terminating phase of liver regeneration. Comparative histological study of hepatic architecture in the three orders amphibian livers. Severe diabetes and leptin resistance cause differential hepatic and renal transporter expression in mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1