Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.

May S H Lee, Duong Nguyen, C T Yu, Jennifer R Thorsteinsson, Toby L Martin, Garry L Martin
{"title":"Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"May S H Lee,&nbsp;Duong Nguyen,&nbsp;C T Yu,&nbsp;Jennifer R Thorsteinsson,&nbsp;Toby L Martin,&nbsp;Garry L Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the relationship between three discrimination skills (visual, visual matching-to-sample, and auditory-visual) and four stimulus modalities (object, picture, spoken, and video) in assessing preferences of leisure activities for 7 adults with developmental disabilities. Three discrimination skills were measured using the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities Test. Three participants mastered a visual discrimination task, but not visual matching-to-sample and auditory-visual discriminations; two participants mastered visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, and two participants showed all three discriminations. The most and least preferred activities, identified through paired-stimulus preference assessment using objects, were presented to each participant in each of the four modalities using a reversal design. The results showed that (1) participants with visual discrimination alone showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object modality only; (2) those with visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object but not in the spoken modality, and mixed results in the pictorial and video modalities; and (3) those with all three discriminations showed a preference for their preferred activities in all four modalities. These results provide partial replications of previous findings on the relationship between discriminations and object, pictorial, and spoken modalities, and extend previous research to include video stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":93641,"journal":{"name":"Education and training in developmental disabilities","volume":"43 3","pages":"388-396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607581/pdf/nihms2614.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and training in developmental disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined the relationship between three discrimination skills (visual, visual matching-to-sample, and auditory-visual) and four stimulus modalities (object, picture, spoken, and video) in assessing preferences of leisure activities for 7 adults with developmental disabilities. Three discrimination skills were measured using the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities Test. Three participants mastered a visual discrimination task, but not visual matching-to-sample and auditory-visual discriminations; two participants mastered visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, and two participants showed all three discriminations. The most and least preferred activities, identified through paired-stimulus preference assessment using objects, were presented to each participant in each of the four modalities using a reversal design. The results showed that (1) participants with visual discrimination alone showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object modality only; (2) those with visual and visual matching-to-sample discriminations, but not auditory-visual discrimination, showed a preference for their preferred activities in the object but not in the spoken modality, and mixed results in the pictorial and video modalities; and (3) those with all three discriminations showed a preference for their preferred activities in all four modalities. These results provide partial replications of previous findings on the relationship between discriminations and object, pictorial, and spoken modalities, and extend previous research to include video stimuli.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辨别技能预测发育障碍成人偏好评估方法的有效性。
在评估7名发育障碍成人的休闲活动偏好时,研究了三种辨别技能(视觉、视觉匹配样本和听觉视觉)和四种刺激方式(物体、图片、语音和视频)之间的关系。使用基本学习能力评估测试测量三种辨别技能。三名参与者完成了视觉辨别任务,但没有完成视觉匹配-样本和听觉-视觉辨别任务;两名参与者掌握了视觉和视觉匹配-样本的辨别能力,但没有掌握听觉-视觉辨别能力,还有两名参与者掌握了所有三种辨别能力。最喜欢和最不喜欢的活动,通过配对刺激偏好评估确定使用对象,呈现给每个参与者在每个四种模式使用反转设计。结果表明:(1)单独存在视觉歧视的被试只对自己喜欢的活动在物体形态上表现出偏好;(2)具有视觉和视觉匹配-样本判别,而不具有听觉-视觉判别的人,对他们所偏好的活动在物体上表现出偏好,而在口语模态上表现出偏好,在图片和视频模态上表现出混合结果;(3)在所有四种模式中,所有三种歧视的人都表现出对他们喜欢的活动的偏好。这些结果部分重复了先前关于区分与物体、图像和言语模式之间关系的研究结果,并将先前的研究扩展到包括视频刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discrimination Skills Predict Effective Preference Assessment Methods for Adults with Developmental Disabilities. Predicting Optimal Preference Assessment Methods for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities. Choice, Degree of Preference, and Happiness Indices with Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: A Surprising Finding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1