MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference.

Language and cognitive processes Pub Date : 2014-04-01 Epub Date: 2013-12-05 DOI:10.1080/01690965.2013.863369
Kimberly Leiken, Liina Pylkkänen
{"title":"MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference.","authors":"Kimberly Leiken,&nbsp;Liina Pylkkänen","doi":"10.1080/01690965.2013.863369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca's region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. <i>the reporter who the senator attacked</i>), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (<i>the reporter who Bill attacked</i>). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.</p>","PeriodicalId":87410,"journal":{"name":"Language and cognitive processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01690965.2013.863369","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and cognitive processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.863369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study addresses a much-debated effect on a much-debated region: the increase of left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) activation associated with object-extracted relative clauses. This haemodynamic result is one of the most central and most cited findings in the cognitive neuroscience of syntax and it has robustly contributed to the popular association of Broca's region with syntax. Our study had two goals: (1) to characterise the timing of this classic effect with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and (2) to connect it to psycholinguistic research on the effects of similarity-based interference during sentence processing. Specifically, behavioural studies have shown that object relatives are primarily only costly when the two preverbal noun phrases are parallel in their surface syntax, for example, both consisting of a definite determiner and a noun (e.g. the reporter who the senator attacked), as opposed to employing, for example, a definite noun phrase and a proper name (the reporter who Bill attacked). This finding suggests that the difficulty of object extraction lies not within its syntax but rather in similarity-based interference affecting working memory processes. Although working memory is a prominent hypothesis for the LIFG engagement in object extraction, the haemodynamic literature has routinely employed stimuli involving parallel as opposed to non-parallel syntax. Using written sentences presented word-by-word, we tested whether an LIFG effect of object extraction is obtained with MEG, allowing us to characterise its timing, and whether it reduces or disappears if the two preverbal noun phrases are non-parallel in their surface syntax. Our results show an LIFG increase for object relatives at around 600 ms after verb onset, but only when the preverbal arguments are parallel. These findings are consistent with memory and competition-based explanations of the LIFG effect of object extraction and challenge accounts attributing it to displacement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEG证据表明,目标提取的LIFG效应需要基于相似度的干扰。
本研究解决了一个备受争议的区域的争议效应:左侧额下回(LIFG)激活的增加与对象提取的相对子句有关。这一血流动力学结果是句法认知神经科学中最核心和被引用最多的发现之一,它有力地促进了布洛卡区与句法的流行联系。我们的研究有两个目标:(1)用脑磁图(MEG)来描述这种经典效应的时间特征;(2)将其与基于相似性的干扰在句子处理过程中的影响的心理语言学研究联系起来。具体来说,行为研究表明,客体亲缘关系主要只在两个前言名词短语表面语法平行的情况下才有代价,例如,两个前言名词短语都由一个限定词和一个名词组成(例如,参议员攻击的记者),而不是使用一个确定名词短语和一个专有名称(例如,比尔攻击的记者)。这一发现表明,对象提取的困难不在于其语法,而在于影响工作记忆过程的基于相似性的干扰。虽然工作记忆是LIFG参与物体提取的一个重要假设,但血流动力学文献通常使用涉及并行语法而不是非并行语法的刺激。使用逐字呈现的书面句子,我们测试了MEG是否获得了物体提取的LIFG效应,允许我们表征其时间,以及如果两个前言名词短语在表面语法上不平行,它是否会减少或消失。我们的研究结果表明,在动词开始后约600毫秒,对象亲属的LIFG增加,但只有在言语前论点平行时才会增加。这些发现与基于记忆和竞争的对物体提取的LIFG效应的解释以及将其归因于位移的挑战解释是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns. MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference. Phonemes and Production. Memory availability and referential access. The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1