Changes in Blood Lipid Levels After a Digitally Enabled Cardiometabolic Preventive Health Program: Pre-Post Study in an Adult Dutch General Population Cohort.

Q2 Medicine JMIR Cardio Pub Date : 2022-03-23 DOI:10.2196/34946
José Castela Forte, Rahul Gannamani, Pytrik Folkertsma, Sridhar Kumaraswamy, Sarah Mount, Sipko van Dam, Jan Hoogsteen
{"title":"Changes in Blood Lipid Levels After a Digitally Enabled Cardiometabolic Preventive Health Program: Pre-Post Study in an Adult Dutch General Population Cohort.","authors":"José Castela Forte,&nbsp;Rahul Gannamani,&nbsp;Pytrik Folkertsma,&nbsp;Sridhar Kumaraswamy,&nbsp;Sarah Mount,&nbsp;Sipko van Dam,&nbsp;Jan Hoogsteen","doi":"10.2196/34946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite widespread education, many individuals fail to follow basic health behaviors such as consuming a healthy diet and exercising. Positive changes in lifestyle habits are associated with improvements in multiple cardiometabolic health risk factors, including lipid levels. Digital lifestyle interventions have been suggested as a viable complement or potential alternative to conventional health behavior change strategies. However, the benefit of digital preventive interventions for lipid levels in a preventive health context remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This observational study aimed to determine how the levels of lipids, namely total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, changed over time in a Dutch general population cohort undergoing a digital preventive health program. Moreover, we looked to establish associations between lifestyle factors at baseline and lipid levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 348 adults from the Dutch general population who underwent a digitally enabled preventive health program at Ancora Health between January 2020 and October 2021. Upon enrollment, participants underwent a baseline assessment involving a comprehensive lifestyle questionnaire, a blood biochemistry panel, physical measurements, and cardiopulmonary fitness measurements. Thereafter, users underwent a lifestyle coaching program and could access the digital application to register and track health behaviors, weight, and anthropometric data at any time. Lipid levels were categorized as normal, elevated, high, and clinical dyslipidemia according to accepted international standards. If at least one lipid marker was high or HDL was low, participants received specific coaching and advice for cardiometabolic health. We retrospectively analyzed the mean and percentage changes in lipid markers in users who were remeasured after a cardiometabolic health-focused intervention, and studied the association between baseline user lifestyle characteristics and having normal lipid levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort, 199 (57.2%) participants had dyslipidemia at baseline, of which 104 participants were advised to follow a cardiometabolic health-focused intervention. Eating more amounts of favorable food groups and being more active were associated with normal lipid profiles. Among the participants who underwent remeasurement 9 months after intervention completion, 57% (17/30), 61% (19/31), 56% (15/27), 82% (9/11), and 100% (8/8) showed improvements at remeasurement for total, LDL, HDL, and non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, respectively. Moreover, between 35.3% and 77.8% showed a return to normal levels. In those with high lipid levels at baseline, total cholesterol decreased by 0.5 mmol/L (7.5%), LDL cholesterol decreased by 0.39 mmol/L (10.0%), non-HDL cholesterol decreased by 0.44 mmol/L (8.3%), triglycerides decreased by 0.97 mmol/L (32.0%), and HDL increased by 0.17 mmol/L (15.6%), after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A cardiometabolic screening program in a general population cohort identified a significant portion of individuals with subclinical and clinical lipid levels. Individuals who, after screening, actively engaged in a cardiometabolic health-focused lifestyle program improved their lipid levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":" ","pages":"e34946"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987960/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/34946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Despite widespread education, many individuals fail to follow basic health behaviors such as consuming a healthy diet and exercising. Positive changes in lifestyle habits are associated with improvements in multiple cardiometabolic health risk factors, including lipid levels. Digital lifestyle interventions have been suggested as a viable complement or potential alternative to conventional health behavior change strategies. However, the benefit of digital preventive interventions for lipid levels in a preventive health context remains unclear.

Objective: This observational study aimed to determine how the levels of lipids, namely total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, changed over time in a Dutch general population cohort undergoing a digital preventive health program. Moreover, we looked to establish associations between lifestyle factors at baseline and lipid levels.

Methods: We included 348 adults from the Dutch general population who underwent a digitally enabled preventive health program at Ancora Health between January 2020 and October 2021. Upon enrollment, participants underwent a baseline assessment involving a comprehensive lifestyle questionnaire, a blood biochemistry panel, physical measurements, and cardiopulmonary fitness measurements. Thereafter, users underwent a lifestyle coaching program and could access the digital application to register and track health behaviors, weight, and anthropometric data at any time. Lipid levels were categorized as normal, elevated, high, and clinical dyslipidemia according to accepted international standards. If at least one lipid marker was high or HDL was low, participants received specific coaching and advice for cardiometabolic health. We retrospectively analyzed the mean and percentage changes in lipid markers in users who were remeasured after a cardiometabolic health-focused intervention, and studied the association between baseline user lifestyle characteristics and having normal lipid levels.

Results: In our cohort, 199 (57.2%) participants had dyslipidemia at baseline, of which 104 participants were advised to follow a cardiometabolic health-focused intervention. Eating more amounts of favorable food groups and being more active were associated with normal lipid profiles. Among the participants who underwent remeasurement 9 months after intervention completion, 57% (17/30), 61% (19/31), 56% (15/27), 82% (9/11), and 100% (8/8) showed improvements at remeasurement for total, LDL, HDL, and non-HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides, respectively. Moreover, between 35.3% and 77.8% showed a return to normal levels. In those with high lipid levels at baseline, total cholesterol decreased by 0.5 mmol/L (7.5%), LDL cholesterol decreased by 0.39 mmol/L (10.0%), non-HDL cholesterol decreased by 0.44 mmol/L (8.3%), triglycerides decreased by 0.97 mmol/L (32.0%), and HDL increased by 0.17 mmol/L (15.6%), after the intervention.

Conclusions: A cardiometabolic screening program in a general population cohort identified a significant portion of individuals with subclinical and clinical lipid levels. Individuals who, after screening, actively engaged in a cardiometabolic health-focused lifestyle program improved their lipid levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字化心脏代谢预防健康项目后血脂水平的变化:荷兰成年普通人群队列的前后研究
背景:尽管广泛的教育,许多人未能遵循基本的健康行为,如消费健康的饮食和锻炼。生活习惯的积极改变与多种心脏代谢健康风险因素的改善有关,包括血脂水平。数字生活方式干预已被建议作为传统健康行为改变战略的可行补充或潜在替代方案。然而,在预防健康的背景下,数字预防干预血脂水平的好处仍不清楚。目的:本观察性研究旨在确定脂质水平,即总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯,如何随时间变化,在荷兰普通人群队列中进行数字预防健康计划。此外,我们希望建立生活方式因素在基线和脂质水平之间的联系。方法:我们纳入了来自荷兰普通人群的348名成年人,他们在2020年1月至2021年10月期间在安科拉健康中心接受了数字化预防健康计划。入组后,参与者接受了包括综合生活方式问卷、血液生化检查、身体测量和心肺健康测量在内的基线评估。此后,用户接受了一项生活方式指导计划,并可以随时访问数字应用程序来注册和跟踪健康行为、体重和人体测量数据。根据公认的国际标准,血脂水平分为正常、升高、高和临床血脂异常。如果至少有一种脂质标记物高或HDL低,参与者将接受专门的心脏代谢健康指导和建议。我们回顾性分析了在以心脏代谢健康为重点的干预后重新测量的用户的脂质标志物的平均值和百分比变化,并研究了基线用户生活方式特征与正常脂质水平之间的关系。结果:在我们的队列中,199名(57.2%)参与者在基线时患有血脂异常,其中104名参与者被建议遵循以心脏代谢健康为重点的干预措施。吃更多有益的食物和更积极的运动与正常的血脂水平有关。在干预结束9个月后重新测量的参与者中,分别有57%(17/30)、61%(19/31)、56%(15/27)、82%(9/11)和100%(8/8)在重新测量总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白、高密度脂蛋白和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯方面表现出改善。此外,35.3%至77.8%的人恢复到正常水平。在基线时血脂水平较高的患者中,干预后总胆固醇降低0.5 mmol/L (7.5%), LDL胆固醇降低0.39 mmol/L(10.0%),非HDL胆固醇降低0.44 mmol/L(8.3%),甘油三酯降低0.97 mmol/L (32.0%), HDL升高0.17 mmol/L(15.6%)。结论:在普通人群队列中进行的心脏代谢筛查程序确定了亚临床和临床脂质水平的显著部分个体。筛选后,积极参与以心脏代谢健康为重点的生活方式项目的个体,其血脂水平有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cardio
JMIR Cardio Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Auscultation Quality Using Contemporary Digital Stethoscopes. The Development of Heart Failure Electronic-Message Driven Tips to Support Self-Management: Co-Design Case Study. Identifying the Severity of Heart Valve Stenosis and Regurgitation Among a Diverse Population Within an Integrated Health Care System: Natural Language Processing Approach. Smart Device Ownership and Use of Social Media, Wearable Trackers, and Health Apps Among Black Women With Hypertension in the United States: National Survey Study. A co-design case study of the development of heart failure e-TIPS to support self-management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1