The relationship between breastfeeding and motor development in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuac013
Monserrat Hernández-Luengo, Celia Álvarez-Bueno, José Alberto Martínez-Hortelano, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Blanca Notario-Pacheco
{"title":"The relationship between breastfeeding and motor development in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Monserrat Hernández-Luengo,&nbsp;Celia Álvarez-Bueno,&nbsp;José Alberto Martínez-Hortelano,&nbsp;Iván Cavero-Redondo,&nbsp;Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno,&nbsp;Blanca Notario-Pacheco","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuac013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The importance and benefits of breastfeeding in children are well recognized, and it may improve motor development. Motor skills are fundamental to childhood development. Although some studies report a positive association between breastfeeding and motor development in children, others have suggested that these differences could be influenced by confounding variables.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the degree to which breastfeeding duration and exclusivity is associated with motor development in children. Thus, a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2021.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The most adjusted relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) reported by included studies were used. The \"breastfeeding duration\" category defined by each study was used as the reference category. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed based on the duration of breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Eighteen published studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the effect size (ES) for exclusively breastfed vs never breastfed children was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.41, I2 = 90.3%), and the ES for children breastfed for any length vs never breastfed children was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.10, I2 = 88.0%). The remaining groups studied did not show significant differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although our data suggest that breastfeeding may improve motor development in children, more studies are needed because publication bias has been detected. Nevertheless, our results support the promotion of breastfeeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1827-1835"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuac013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: The importance and benefits of breastfeeding in children are well recognized, and it may improve motor development. Motor skills are fundamental to childhood development. Although some studies report a positive association between breastfeeding and motor development in children, others have suggested that these differences could be influenced by confounding variables.

Objective: To estimate the degree to which breastfeeding duration and exclusivity is associated with motor development in children. Thus, a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis was conducted.

Data sources: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2021.

Data extraction: The most adjusted relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) reported by included studies were used. The "breastfeeding duration" category defined by each study was used as the reference category. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed based on the duration of breastfeeding.

Data analysis: Eighteen published studies were included in the systematic review and 14 studies in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the effect size (ES) for exclusively breastfed vs never breastfed children was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.41, I2 = 90.3%), and the ES for children breastfed for any length vs never breastfed children was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.10, I2 = 88.0%). The remaining groups studied did not show significant differences in outcomes.

Conclusions: Although our data suggest that breastfeeding may improve motor development in children, more studies are needed because publication bias has been detected. Nevertheless, our results support the promotion of breastfeeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母乳喂养与儿童运动发育的关系:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:母乳喂养对儿童的重要性和益处是公认的,它可以改善运动发育。运动技能是儿童发展的基础。尽管一些研究报告了母乳喂养与儿童运动发育之间的正相关,但其他研究表明,这些差异可能受到混杂变量的影响。目的:评估母乳喂养持续时间和排他性对儿童运动发育的影响程度。因此,我们对文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:MEDLINE(通过PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Web of Science数据库从成立到2021年6月进行了系统检索。资料提取:采用纳入研究报告的最校正相对危险度(rr)或优势比(ORs)及其相应的95%置信区间(95% ci)。每项研究定义的“母乳喂养持续时间”类别被用作参考类别。此外,根据母乳喂养时间进行亚组分析。数据分析:系统评价纳入18项已发表的研究,荟萃分析纳入14项研究。结果显示,纯母乳喂养与从未母乳喂养儿童的效应量(ES)为0.86 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.41, I2 = 90.3%),任何长度的母乳喂养儿童与从未母乳喂养儿童的效应量(ES)为0.95 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.10, I2 = 88.0%)。其余的研究组在结果上没有显示出显著的差异。结论:虽然我们的数据表明母乳喂养可以改善儿童的运动发育,但由于发现了发表偏倚,需要更多的研究。然而,我们的研究结果支持母乳喂养的推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Time-Restricted Eating With and Without Caloric Restriction for Weight Loss. Effects of Selenium Administration on Blood Lipids: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Experimental Human Studies. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Gut Microbiota-Based Interventions on Gastrointestinal and Behavioral Symptoms in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Association Among Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms, Metabolic Control, and Inflammatory Markers in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comparison of Different Intermittent Fasting Patterns or Different Extents of Calorie Restriction for Weight Loss and Metabolic Improvement in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1