Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05
M Amaral, T M B Campos, T Takahashi, G S D Moura, G F Ramos, R M D Melo, M Özcan
{"title":"Water as Veneering Modeling Liquid Affects Microhardness of Glassy Matrix Veneering Ceramic.","authors":"M Amaral,&nbsp;T M B Campos,&nbsp;T Takahashi,&nbsp;G S D Moura,&nbsp;G F Ramos,&nbsp;R M D Melo,&nbsp;M Özcan","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/aim: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water (DW), isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05), 1% (P1), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm × 1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation (n=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p=0.002): DW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness (p=0.301) and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML, all obtained values are inside the range of enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect antagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2372Amaral05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/aim: To evaluate the effect of different veneering liquids used for modeling on microhardness, fracture toughness and biaxial flexural strength of a glass-veneering ceramic.

Material and methods: The manufacturer recommended modeling liquid (ML), distilled water (DW), isopropyl alcohol (IA), 0.5% (P05), 1% (P1), and 2% (P2) polyethylene glycol solutions were mixed with feldspathic ceramic powder to form disc-shaped samples (n=20, 15 mm × 1.2 mm). After sintering, samples were mirror-polished and subjected to Vickers indentation (n=5) for measurement of microhardness and fracture toughness. The remaining 15 samples from each group were subjected to biaxial flexural strength. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Weibull analysis.

Results: The microhardness was affected by veneering liquid (p=0.002): DW promoted higher microhardness values than ML and IA. Fracture toughness (p=0.301) and flexural strength (p=0.930) were not affected by the veneering liquid but Weibull parameters were affected. All groups presented surface pores under high magnification.

Conclusion: Even though the use of DW led to higher values of surface microhardness than the ML, all obtained values are inside the range of enamel microhardness values reported in the literature. Such parameters may affect antagonist wear and should be reported in clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水作为贴面模拟液对玻璃基贴面陶瓷显微硬度的影响
目的:评价不同贴面液对玻璃贴面陶瓷显微硬度、断裂韧性和双轴抗折强度的影响。材料和方法:制造商推荐的建模液(ML)、蒸馏水(DW)、异丙醇(IA)、0.5% (P05)、1% (P1)和2% (P2)聚乙二醇溶液与长石陶瓷粉混合,形成圆盘状样品(n=20、15 mm × 1.2 mm)。烧结后,对样品进行镜面抛光,并进行维氏压痕(n=5)测量显微硬度和断裂韧性。每组剩余15个试件进行双轴抗弯强度试验。数据采用单因素方差分析和威布尔分析。结果:贴面液对牙体显微硬度有影响(p=0.002): DW对牙体显微硬度的影响高于ML和IA。贴面液对断裂韧性(p=0.301)和抗弯强度(p=0.930)没有影响,但对威布尔参数有影响。高倍镜下各组表面均有气孔。结论:虽然DW的使用导致表面显微硬度值高于ML,但所获得的数值均在文献报道的牙釉质显微硬度值范围内。这些参数可能影响拮抗剂的磨损,应在临床试验中报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Repeated Firings on Color Stability of Zirconia- Reinforced Lithium Silicate and Lithium Disilicate Ceramics. Success and Survival of Composite Resin Restorations for the Management of Localized Anterior Tooth Wear: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Tensile Bond Strength, Fit Accuracy and Failure Types of Zirconia and Cast Gold Root Copings for Overdentures. Clinical Performance of 3D Printed Resin Composite Posterior Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Permanent Solution? Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1