Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical Patients: Insights from the MARINER Trial.

Alex C Spyropoulos, Mark Goldin, Walter Ageno, Gregory W Albers, C Gregory Elliott, William R Hiatt, Jonathan L Halperin, Gregory Maynard, P Gabriel Steg, Jeffrey I Weitz, Theodore E Spiro, Wentao Lu, Jessica Marsigliano, Gary E Raskob, Elliot S Barnathan
{"title":"Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis in Acutely Ill Medical Patients: Insights from the MARINER Trial.","authors":"Alex C Spyropoulos,&nbsp;Mark Goldin,&nbsp;Walter Ageno,&nbsp;Gregory W Albers,&nbsp;C Gregory Elliott,&nbsp;William R Hiatt,&nbsp;Jonathan L Halperin,&nbsp;Gregory Maynard,&nbsp;P Gabriel Steg,&nbsp;Jeffrey I Weitz,&nbsp;Theodore E Spiro,&nbsp;Wentao Lu,&nbsp;Jessica Marsigliano,&nbsp;Gary E Raskob,&nbsp;Elliot S Barnathan","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1750379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The MARINER trial evaluated whether postdischarge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban could reduce the primary outcome of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death in acutely ill medical patients at risk for VTE. Although aspirin use was not randomized, approximately half of the enrolled patients were receiving aspirin at baseline. We hypothesized that thromboprophylaxis with once-daily rivaroxaban (10 mg or, if creatinine clearance was 30-49 mL/min, 7.5 mg) plus aspirin (R/A) would be superior to placebo without aspirin (no thromboprophylaxis [no TP]). <b>Methods</b>  We compared the primary and major secondary outcomes in the intention-to-treat population in four subgroups defined at baseline: (1) R/A ( <i>N</i>  = 3,159); (2) rivaroxaban alone ( <i>N</i>  = 2,848); (3) aspirin alone ( <i>N</i>  = 3,046); and (4) no TP ( <i>N</i>  = 2,966). Major bleeding (MB) and nonmajor clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding were assessed in the safety population on treatment plus 2 days. <b>Results</b>  Patients on R/A had reduced symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death compared with no TP (0.76 vs 1.28%, <i>p</i>  = 0.042), and experienced less symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality ( <i>p</i>  = 0.005) and all-cause mortality alone ( <i>p</i>  = 0.01) compared with no TP. Event incidences for rivaroxaban alone (0.91%) or aspirin alone (0.92%) were similar. MB was low in all groups but lowest in the no TP group. NMCR bleeding was increased with R/A compared with no TP ( <i>p</i>  = 0.009). <b>Limitations</b>  Aspirin use was not randomized. <b>Conclusion</b>  Extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis with R/A was associated with less symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death compared with no TP in previously hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE. NMCR bleeding was increased with R/A compared with no TP. These post hoc findings need confirmation in a prospective trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":" ","pages":"e177-e183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273326/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1750379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background  The MARINER trial evaluated whether postdischarge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban could reduce the primary outcome of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) or VTE-related death in acutely ill medical patients at risk for VTE. Although aspirin use was not randomized, approximately half of the enrolled patients were receiving aspirin at baseline. We hypothesized that thromboprophylaxis with once-daily rivaroxaban (10 mg or, if creatinine clearance was 30-49 mL/min, 7.5 mg) plus aspirin (R/A) would be superior to placebo without aspirin (no thromboprophylaxis [no TP]). Methods  We compared the primary and major secondary outcomes in the intention-to-treat population in four subgroups defined at baseline: (1) R/A ( N  = 3,159); (2) rivaroxaban alone ( N  = 2,848); (3) aspirin alone ( N  = 3,046); and (4) no TP ( N  = 2,966). Major bleeding (MB) and nonmajor clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding were assessed in the safety population on treatment plus 2 days. Results  Patients on R/A had reduced symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death compared with no TP (0.76 vs 1.28%, p  = 0.042), and experienced less symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality ( p  = 0.005) and all-cause mortality alone ( p  = 0.01) compared with no TP. Event incidences for rivaroxaban alone (0.91%) or aspirin alone (0.92%) were similar. MB was low in all groups but lowest in the no TP group. NMCR bleeding was increased with R/A compared with no TP ( p  = 0.009). Limitations  Aspirin use was not randomized. Conclusion  Extended postdischarge thromboprophylaxis with R/A was associated with less symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death compared with no TP in previously hospitalized medical patients at risk for VTE. NMCR bleeding was increased with R/A compared with no TP. These post hoc findings need confirmation in a prospective trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利伐沙班加阿司匹林用于急性疾病患者的延长血栓预防:来自MARINER试验的见解
MARINER试验评估了利伐沙班预防出院后血栓是否可以降低有血栓栓塞危险的急性病患者的症状性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)或VTE相关死亡的主要结局。虽然阿司匹林的使用不是随机的,但大约一半的入组患者在基线时服用阿司匹林。我们假设每日一次利伐沙班(10mg,或如果肌酐清除率为30-49 mL/min, 7.5 mg)加阿司匹林(R/A)的血栓预防优于不加阿司匹林的安慰剂(无血栓预防[无TP])。方法:我们比较了基线定义的四个亚组意向治疗人群的主要和次要结局:(1)R/A (N = 3159);(2)单独使用利伐沙班(N = 2,848);(3)单纯服用阿司匹林(N = 3046);(4)无TP (N = 2966)。在治疗加2天的安全人群中评估大出血(MB)和非大出血临床相关(NMCR)。结果与未接受TP治疗的患者相比,接受R/A治疗的患者症状性VTE和VTE相关死亡减少(0.76 vs 1.28%, p = 0.042),症状性VTE和全因死亡率(p = 0.005)和单纯全因死亡率(p = 0.01)均低于未接受TP治疗的患者。单独使用利伐沙班(0.91%)或阿司匹林(0.92%)的事件发生率相似。MB在所有组中均较低,但在无TP组中最低。与无TP组相比,NMCR出血随R/A增加(p = 0.009)。阿司匹林的使用不是随机的。结论在有血栓栓塞危险的既往住院患者中,延长出院后血栓预防与R/A相比,与没有TP的患者相比,症状性静脉血栓栓塞和静脉血栓栓塞相关死亡较少相关。与无TP组相比,NMCR出血随R/A增加。这些事后发现需要在前瞻性试验中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Urgent Bleeding in Patients with Hemophilia A: Focus on the Use of Emicizumab Disease Burden, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life in People with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in Europe: Analyses from CHESS II/CHESS PAEDs TH Open Continues to Highlight the State-of-the-Art on Thrombosis and Hemostasis with a Renewed Editorial Board The Effect of Rituximab on Antiphospholipid Titers in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Potential for a Virtual Care Model in the Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1