Masseter Muscle Thickness And Elasticity in Bruxism After Exercise Treatment: A Comparison Trial

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.07.004
İlyas Uçar PT, PhD , Caner Kararti PT, PhD , Yeliz Dadali MD , Anıl Özüdoğru PT, PhD , Mehmet Okçu MD
{"title":"Masseter Muscle Thickness And Elasticity in Bruxism After Exercise Treatment: A Comparison Trial","authors":"İlyas Uçar PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Caner Kararti PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Yeliz Dadali MD ,&nbsp;Anıl Özüdoğru PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Mehmet Okçu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of Rocabado's 6 × 6 exercises on masseter muscle thickness, muscle elasticity, and pain scores </span>in patients<span> with bruxism.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 58 participants with bruxism were divided into 2 groups as the exercise group (EG) and control group (CG). A self-care program was applied for the participants in the CG. For those in the EG, in addition to the self-care program, an exercise treatment<span><span> was performed for 6 days per week for a total of 8 weeks. Using ultrasonography<span>, bilateral masseter muscle thickness and elasticity were assessed before and after treatment. Pain was measured using a </span></span>visual analog scale. Changes over time within the groups and group–time interactions for continuous variables were assessed using mixed 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The improvement in muscle elasticity (<em>P</em> = .015; <em>P</em> = .004) and pain values (<em>P</em> = .049; <em>P</em> = .040) were greater in the EG compared with the CG. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for masseter muscle thickness (<em>P &gt; .</em>05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that Rocabado's 6 × 6 exercises are effective in the treatment of muscle elasticity and pain values in participants with bruxism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161475422000926","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of Rocabado's 6 × 6 exercises on masseter muscle thickness, muscle elasticity, and pain scores in patients with bruxism.

Methods

A total of 58 participants with bruxism were divided into 2 groups as the exercise group (EG) and control group (CG). A self-care program was applied for the participants in the CG. For those in the EG, in addition to the self-care program, an exercise treatment was performed for 6 days per week for a total of 8 weeks. Using ultrasonography, bilateral masseter muscle thickness and elasticity were assessed before and after treatment. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale. Changes over time within the groups and group–time interactions for continuous variables were assessed using mixed 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance.

Results

The improvement in muscle elasticity (P = .015; P = .004) and pain values (P = .049; P = .040) were greater in the EG compared with the CG. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for masseter muscle thickness (P > .05).

Conclusion

This study suggests that Rocabado's 6 × 6 exercises are effective in the treatment of muscle elasticity and pain values in participants with bruxism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磨牙症运动治疗后咬肌厚度和弹性:一项比较试验
目的探讨Rocabado's 6 × 6运动对磨牙症患者咬肌厚度、肌肉弹性和疼痛评分的影响。方法将58例磨牙患者分为运动组(EG)和对照组(CG)。对CG组的参与者进行自我护理。对于那些在EG中的人,除了自我护理计划外,每周进行6天的运动治疗,共8周。治疗前后采用超声检查双侧咬肌厚度和弹性。疼痛用视觉模拟量表测量。使用混合双向重复测量方差分析评估组内随时间的变化和连续变量的组时间相互作用。结果肌肉弹性改善(P = 0.015;P = 0.004)和疼痛值(P = 0.049;P = 0.040), EG高于CG。两组间咬肌厚度差异无统计学意义(P >. 05)。结论Rocabado的6 × 6运动对磨牙症患者的肌肉弹性和疼痛值有明显的改善作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Chiropractic Intervention on Oculomotor and Attentional Visual Outcomes in Young Adults With Long-Term Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Influence of instructions and expectations in pain perception on pupil diameter and the cognitive assessment of pain. Effects of Cervical Mobilization on Balance and Proprioception in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain. Influence of Changing Hip Position on Electromyographic Activities of Selected Trunk Muscles During Bridging Exercises in Healthy Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study. Influence of Physical Characteristics of Obstacles on the Locomotor Pattern of Older Adults at Higher Risk of Falling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1