Validation of the Japanese version of the patterns of activity measure-pain in individuals with chronic pain.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2022-09-04 DOI:10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z
Kiyoka Enomoto, Tomonori Adachi, Akira Mibu, Katsuyoshi Tanaka, Sei Fukui, Miho Nakanishi, Narihito Iwashita, Jun Sasaki, Tomohiko Nishigami
{"title":"Validation of the Japanese version of the patterns of activity measure-pain in individuals with chronic pain.","authors":"Kiyoka Enomoto,&nbsp;Tomonori Adachi,&nbsp;Akira Mibu,&nbsp;Katsuyoshi Tanaka,&nbsp;Sei Fukui,&nbsp;Miho Nakanishi,&nbsp;Narihito Iwashita,&nbsp;Jun Sasaki,&nbsp;Tomohiko Nishigami","doi":"10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is a self-report questionnaire that measures avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in individuals with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and confirm the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the POAM-P(POAM-P-J) in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 147 Japanese individuals with chronic pain (106 women; mean age 64.89 ± 12.13 years). The individuals completed the POAM-P-J, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The following psychometric properties of the POAM-P-J were confirmed: structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tested factor structure via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). We chose the 3-factor model with six covariances. The POAM-P-J's internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable to good (α = 0.79-0.86; ICC = 0.72-0.87). The avoidance and overdoing subscales were positively associated with pain severity, pain interference, and anxiety measures (all p < 0.05), but the pacing subscale was not significantly associated with these pain-related measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the structural validity of the POAM-P-J remains questionable, its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were confirmed. The POAM-P-J is useful in both research and clinical practice for evaluating the activity patterns of Japanese patients with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441030/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is a self-report questionnaire that measures avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in individuals with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and confirm the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the POAM-P(POAM-P-J) in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.

Methods: We recruited 147 Japanese individuals with chronic pain (106 women; mean age 64.89 ± 12.13 years). The individuals completed the POAM-P-J, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The following psychometric properties of the POAM-P-J were confirmed: structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity.

Results: We tested factor structure via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). We chose the 3-factor model with six covariances. The POAM-P-J's internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable to good (α = 0.79-0.86; ICC = 0.72-0.87). The avoidance and overdoing subscales were positively associated with pain severity, pain interference, and anxiety measures (all p < 0.05), but the pacing subscale was not significantly associated with these pain-related measures.

Conclusions: Although the structural validity of the POAM-P-J remains questionable, its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were confirmed. The POAM-P-J is useful in both research and clinical practice for evaluating the activity patterns of Japanese patients with chronic pain.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本版慢性疼痛患者活动测量模式的验证。
背景:活动测量-疼痛模式(POAM-P)是一份自我报告问卷,用于测量慢性疼痛患者的回避、过度运动和步调。我们的目的是开发和确认日本版POAM-P(POAM-P- j)在日本慢性疼痛患者中的心理测量特性。方法:我们招募了147名日本慢性疼痛患者(106名女性;平均年龄64.89±12.13岁)。这些个体完成了POAM-P-J、简短疼痛量表(BPI)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。检验了POAM-P-J量表的结构效度、内部一致性、重测信度和并发效度。结果:通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对因子结构进行检验。我们选择具有6个协方差的3因素模型。POAM-P-J的内部一致性和重测信度可接受至良好(α = 0.79-0.86;icc = 0.72-0.87)。回避和过度行为分量表与疼痛严重程度、疼痛干扰和焦虑测量呈正相关(均为p)。结论:尽管POAM-P-J的结构效度仍有疑问,但其内部一致性、重测信度和并发效度得到了证实。POAM-P-J在研究和临床实践中对评估日本慢性疼痛患者的活动模式都很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1