The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2022-09-05 DOI:10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2
Maria Ordell Sundelin, Charlotte Paltved, Pernille Skjold Kingo, Henrik Kjölhede, Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
{"title":"The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery.","authors":"Maria Ordell Sundelin,&nbsp;Charlotte Paltved,&nbsp;Pernille Skjold Kingo,&nbsp;Henrik Kjölhede,&nbsp;Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62-64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02-109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96-141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37-19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70-21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29-24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446560/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy.

Methods: Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)).

Results: The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62-64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02-109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96-141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37-19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70-21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29-24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group.

Conclusion: In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜和开放手术技术在机器人手术中的可移植性。
背景:在过去的几十年里,机器人手术越来越受欢迎。大多数机器人外科医生已经改变了他们的主要手术活动,从开放或腹腔镜,没有事先正式的机器人训练。在目前的实践中,知道是否有手术技能的转移是非常有趣的。在可视化、运动缩放和运动自由方面,机器人手术比腹腔镜手术更类似于开放手术。因此,我们的假设是,与腹腔镜外科医生相比,开放式训练的外科医生有更多的手术技能转移到机器人手术中。方法:36名没有手术经验的医学生被随机分为三组,在指定的模式下进行强化模拟训练:开放手术、腹腔镜或机器人辅助腹腔镜。在所有研究对象的训练期间,随后在猪模型中进行机器人辅助肠吻合。作为手术质量的替代标记,吻合器进行了抗压性测试,并由两名盲法机器人专家外科医生使用机器人手术性能的全球评定量表(机器人技能全球评估评估(GEARS))评估手术过程的视频记录。结果:腹腔镜训练组肠吻合口平均漏压为36.25 (7.62 ~ 64.89)mmHg,开放手术组平均漏压为69.01 (28.02 ~ 109.99)mmHg,机器人训练组平均漏压为108.45 (74.96 ~ 141.94)mmHg。同样的模式被发现与GEARS作为替代标记手术质量。腹腔镜训练组的GEARS评分为15.71(12.37 ~ 19.04),开放手术组为18.14(14.70 ~ 21.58),机器人训练组为22.04(19.29 ~ 24.79)。与腹腔镜训练组相比,机器人训练组的泄漏压力(p = 0.0015)和GEARS评分(p = 0.0023)均有统计学差异。无论是泄漏压力还是齿轮,在开放组和机器人训练组之间都没有显著差异。结论:在我们的研究中,在由手术新手进行的模拟环境中过渡到机器人手术时,开放手术训练优于腹腔镜训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice. Reclaiming identities: exploring the influence of simulation on refugee doctors' workforce integration. TEAMs go VR-validating the TEAM in a virtual reality (VR) medical team training. Theoretical foundations and implications of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality for immersive learning in health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1